
-
Huge crowds head to Copacabana for free Lady Gaga concert
-
Warren Buffett: billionaire investor with simple tastes
-
Serbian president out of hospital after cutting short US trip
-
Arsenal rocked by Bournemouth, Villa boost top five bid
-
Freeman hat-trick stuns Leinster to take Northampton into Champions Cup final
-
Warren Buffett says will retire from Berkshire Hathaway by year's end
-
Al Ahli beat Kawasaki Frontale to win Asian Champions League
-
Shepherd, Dayal edge Bengaluru past Chennai in IPL thriller
-
Sabalenka beats Gauff to win third Madrid Open crown
-
Arsenal suffer Bournemouth defeat ahead of PSG showdown
-
Napoli six clear in Serie A after win at fiery Lecce
-
Van Nistelrooy glad as Leicester end goal drought against sorry Saints
-
Meta fighting Nigerian fines, warns could shut Facebook, Instagram
-
Hamas armed wing releases video of apparently injured Israeli hostage
-
Norris wins wild and wet Miami GP sprint race
-
Gabon ex-junta chief Oligui sworn in after election win
-
Singapore ruling party wins election in landslide
-
Eurovision warms up with over-60s disco
-
Russell helps Bath beat Edinburgh in Challenge Cup semi-final
-
Second-string PSG beaten by Strasbourg before Arsenal return leg
-
Zelensky says won't play Putin 'games' with short truce
-
Norris wins Miami GP sprint race
-
PM of Yemen government announces resignation
-
South Africa bowler Rabada serving ban for positive drug test
-
Serbian president stable in hospital after cutting short US trip
-
UN envoy urges Israel to halt Syria attacks 'at once'
-
Villa boost top five bid, Southampton beaten at Leicester
-
Leipzig put Bayern and Kane's title party on ice
-
Serbian president hospitalised after cutting short US trip
-
Buick and Appleby rule again in English 2000 Guineas
-
Singapore ruling party headed for clear victory in test for new PM
-
Martinez climbs into Tour de Romandie lead with penultimate stage win
-
O'Sullivan backs Zhao Xintong to become snooker 'megastar'
-
Simbine wins 100m in photo finish thriller as Duplantis dominates
-
Atletico held at Alaves in dry Liga draw
-
Cardinals meet ahead of vote for new pope
-
Snooker star Zhao: from ban to cusp of Chinese sporting history
-
Tielemans keeps Villa in chase for Champions League place
-
Anthony Albanese: Australia's dog-loving, Tory fighting PM
-
Trump may have aided Australian PM's election victory: analysts
-
Right-leaning Australian opposition leader loses election, and seat
-
India blocks Pakistani celebrities on social media
-
Ancelotti says he will reveal future plans at end of season
-
India-Pakistan tensions hit tourism in Kashmiri valley
-
Bangladesh Islamists rally in show of force
-
Zelensky says won't play Putin's 'games' with short truce
-
Cardinals meet ahead of papal election
-
Pakistan tests missile weapons system amid India standoff
-
France charges 21 prison attack suspects
-
Pakistan military says conducts training launch of missile

Biden's student debt relief plan challenged at Supreme Court
The US Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday in a challenge to President Joe Biden's plan to erase nearly $400 billion of student debt, with all eyes on how far the conservative-dominated bench is willing to go to override the Democratic leader.
The court's ruling, expected before June 30, will decide whether millions of Americans will see up to $20,000 of debt disappear, but could also have implications for future presidential actions.
About 200 protesters gathered outside the court, carrying signs backing Biden's policy.
Lamar Brooks, 22, an African American student from Baltimore, said he already had $18,000 of debt and expected the sum to rocket as he hopes to study to become a psychiatrist.
"I could benefit, and also it will help other minorities as well," he told AFP, saying student debt was a "generational financial burden."
Relying on a Covid-related legal justification, Biden announced his student loan forgiveness plan last August, shortly before the crucial midterm elections.
"This relief is critical to over 40 million Americans as they recover from the economic crisis caused by the pandemic," he tweeted early Tuesday.
"We're confident it's legal. And we're fighting for it in court."
Republican-led states were quick to claim he had overreached his authority and an appellate court halted the measure in November.
Under the relief plan, $10,000 would be cut from all loans owed by people earning less than $125,000 per year. For students who went to university with need-based government assistance known as Pell grants, the relief would be $20,000.
In addition to the coalition of Republican states, two students have also filed suit arguing they were unjustly excluded from the program.
During his 2020 campaign, Biden pledged to act to address the massive amounts of debt US students take on to attend higher education -- the White House says nearly 43 million Americans hold $1.6 trillion in federal student loans.
- Wide range of outcomes -
In the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic, then-president Donald Trump ordered a halt to all federal student loan repayments, citing a 2003 law permitting such actions during a "national emergency."
That pause has since been repeatedly renewed, and is currently set to expire in mid-2023.
The Biden administration argues the same law allows for blanket debt cancellation in response to a "once-in-a-century pandemic that starkly disrupted the Nation's economy and borrowers' ability to repay their loans."
Conservatives claim Biden has used the pandemic as a broad excuse to sidestep Congress.
That argument could prevail in the Supreme Court, which has already moved to overturn multiple Covid-related policies issued by the Democratic administration, including on vaccine mandates and a moratorium on evictions.
Biden's Justice Department contends that the Republican states have no legal standing to bring the case as they have "suffered no cognizable injury," and that the two students' challenge is overly broad.
For their part, Republicans are hoping that the panel's 6-3 conservative majority will issue a broad ruling to limit presidential authority, saying that on such important issues the US Constitution requires clear authorization from Congress.
The court used this "major questions doctrine" last June to restrict the powers of the Environmental Protection Agency in its fight against global warming.
If the court further strengthens the doctrine, the Biden administration may find itself unable to act on crucial issues at a time when Congress itself is paralyzed by partisan divisions.
P.Stevenson--AMWN