-
Carrick backs Dalot after hostile reception from Manchester United fans
-
Comet returns as online electrical marketplace 14 years after collapse
-
Aston Villa Defy History With Rare Victory at Old Trafford
-
Brussels Education Unions Schedule Major November Protest Over Funding and Reforms
-
Crowds Gather at San Francisco Park for Elizabeth Holmes Lookalike Tournament
-
Hillcrest and Equipmake Sign Definitive Agreement to Jointly Develop and License ZVS Inverter Technology for Heavy-Duty Electric Vehicles
-
New 401k Gold IRA Investment Guide Explains the Best Way to Invest in Gold for Retirement (2026 Update)
-
Making Your Home Safer for Aging Parents: Accessibility Renovations That Add Value
-
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC Announces Transaction in Own Shares - November 09
-
DataMEDS AI Announces Corexa Pharmacy's First Commercial Sale of Compounded Peptides Under FDA Enforcement Discretion Policy
-
Opti Digital Launches NEXA, an AI-Powered Intelligence Layer
-
Pace Launches Three-Business-Day Culture-Based 'L. pneumophila' Testing
-
Tintina Mines Intersects 460m at 0.50% CuEq at the Dos Amigos Copper-Gold Project in Chile
-
HyProMag USA Advances North Texas Rare Earth Magnet Facility With First Major Equipment Delivery
-
Ispire Technology Inc. Reports First Quarter Fiscal Year 2027 Financial Results
-
Silver Storm Reports Concentrate Deliveries from La Parrilla
-
CoTec Holdings Corp. Notes HyProMag USA Advances North Texas Rare Earth Magnet Facility With First Major Equipment Delivery
-
Nextech3D.ai Closes $720,000 Management-Led Private Placement
-
iPS Cell Research Accelerates Drug Discovery for ALS and Spinal Cord Injury
-
Central Tokyo Apartment Rents Forecast to Rise 11% by 2030
Boeing staff confused on safety reporting: US study
Boeing employees are confused and distrustful of changes to safety reporting systems implemented by the aerospace giant after fatal plane crashes in 2018 and 2019, according to a US report released Monday.
The report pointed to a "disconnect" between senior company management and other Boeing employees and skepticism that safety complaints by workers would not result in retaliation, according to an expert panel appointed by the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).
"The procedures and training are complex and in a constant state of change, creating employee confusion especially among different work sites and employee groups," said an executive summary.
The analysis comes as Boeing faces intensified scrutiny following a January 5 Alaska Airlines emergency landing that led to a temporary grounding of some Boeing 737 MAX aircraft.
The US Congress ordered the analysis in a 2020 law after fatal Lion Air and Ethiopian Airline crashes on 737 MAX planes. The report's scope did not include the Alaska Airlines incident, although the summary alluded to "serious quality issues" that surfaced during the report that "amplified" the panel's concerns.
The analysis identified 27 points of concern and offered 53 recommendations, including steps to standardize safety training, enhance transparency in the handling of employee complaints and improve systems to grant pilots more influence on safety and training matters.
The FAA plans to "immediately" undertake a review to determine next steps, the agency said.
"We will continue to hold Boeing to the highest standard of safety and will work to ensure the company comprehensively addresses these recommendations," the FAA said.
Boeing thanked the panel and said it will "carefully review the panel's assessment and learn from their findings," according to a company statement.
"We've taken important steps to foster a safety culture that empowers and encourages all employees to share their voice," Boeing said. " But there is more work to do."
The report summarized Boeing safety initiatives after the fatal crashes, such as the "Speak Up" portal, an online system for employees to confidentially report concerns about production quality, safety or business ethics.
But employees interviewed for the FAA report expressed "distrust in the anonymity of the Speak Up program," according to the write-up, which said employees prefer to discuss concerns directly with their managers.
"Employees did not understand how to utilize the different reporting systems, which reporting system to use and when," said the FAA.
"The expert panel is concerned that this confusion about reporting systems may discourage employees from submitting safety concerns."
D.Moore--AMWN