-
Hope fades, hunger sets in a week after Venezuela quakes
-
England skipper Sciver-Brunt 'threw everything' at World Cup semi-final return
-
Noosha Aubel: 10 km/h for residents – Potsdam’s approach to potholes: indifference or incompetence?
-
Stocks mixed with eyes on US Fed
-
Bayern to host Stuttgart in Bundesliga season opener
-
Trial begins for suspected mastermind of Malta journalist killing
-
US Fed chair says committed to combatting 'too high' prices
-
Traditionalist Catholic society defies Vatican by consecrating new bishops
-
Portugal braces for high temperatures in new heatwave
-
World number ones Sinner, Sabalenka into Wimbledon third round
-
Trump upbeat as US, Iran hold indirect talks in Qatar
-
Sony to stop releasing PlayStation games on discs
-
Sinner sinks Borges to step up Wimbledon title defence
-
All-white and lavender: Wimbledon hunts drought-resistant flowers
-
Thomas targets yellow in Tour team time-trial
-
Inter Milan laud veteran Mkhitaryan after deal extension
-
Bike - or even walk: World Cup fans improvise to reach NY venue
-
Vaughan calls for England coaching clear-out after Stokes exit
-
Swedish court orders Google pay nearly $2 bn for favouring its price comparisons
-
Sony says to stop releasing PlayStation games on discs
-
England breaks record for warmest June: Met Office
-
Sabalenka sets up Wimbledon third-round clash with Ostapenko
-
Stocks drop with eyes on US Fed
-
Planned 1.7 million satellites 'devastating' for astronomy: study
-
Barca have bid for Atletico's Alvarez: president Laporta
-
Trump defends earning more than $1bn on crypto
-
'Smart' and 'very rational'? Iran's new leaders post-Ali Khamenei
-
Sciver-Brunt fit for England's T20 World Cup semi-final
-
Bordeaux-Begles handed favourable draw in Champions Cup defence
-
Key challenges for Laporta in second Barca term
-
'Thought they'd never be caught': The strike that killed Iran's Khamenei
-
Canada to join Eurovision Song Contest
-
Djokovic, Sinner hope for easier ride after Wimbledon scares
-
Swedish court orders Google pay $1.46 bn for favouring its price comparisons
-
Injured Serena's Wimbledon doubles bid with sister Venus in doubt
-
German FA headquarters searched in Euro 2024 graft probe
-
European stocks mostly drop with eyes on US Fed
-
Village People singer Victor Willis dies at 74
-
Genesio replaces Beye as Marseille boss
-
Thousands rush to get tickets for Bayeux Tapestry's UK show
-
Catholic society defies Vatican again by ordaining new bishops
-
Chinese firm sells hyper-real, 'always loyal' humanoid robots
-
Breakaway Catholic society defies Vatican again by ordaining bishops
-
World's oceans break June heat record: EU monitor
-
Venezuelans search, suffer one week after deadly quakes
-
China imposes 'national security' rules on overseas investments
-
Asian stocks mostly up as traders eye crucial US jobs data
-
'Nothing left except death': Myanmar families grieve huge war toll
-
Ronaldo and Modric struggle to defy Father Time at World Cup
-
England face DR Congo hurdle, USA prepare for World Cup moment in spotlight
Swedish court orders Google pay nearly $2 bn for favouring its price comparisons
A Swedish market court on Wednesday ordered Google to pay some 14.3 billion kronor ($1.46 billion) in damages, plus interest, to price comparison site Pricerunner for promoting its own shopping comparisons in search results.
The Patent and Market Court in Stockholm said "Pricerunner is deemed to have suffered damage as a result of Google having, for many years, unlawfully favoured its own price comparison service."
The case concerns Sweden, Denmark and the UK and the court said it had ordered Google to pay "just over" 1 billion Swedish kronor, 675 million Danish kroner ($103 million) and £950 million ($1.26 billion) as well as "accrued interest" amounting to approximately 400 million Swedish kronor, 250 million Danish kronor and £300 million.
The court noted that Pricerunner, which filed a lawsuit in 2022 and has since been acquired by fintech giant Klarna, had requested "significantly higher damages, but was not entirely successful in its claim."
"In many ways, this is a complex and wide-ranging case, and although Pricerunner has not been entirely successful in its claim, the damages awarded are undoubtedly the largest ever ordered in a Swedish competition case," judge Linda Kullberg said in a statement.
Pricerunner had requested damages totalling 64 billion kronor and an additional 14 billion kronor in interest.
Dan Greaves, head of communications and policy at Klarna, said the ruling "supports a healthier, more competitive market for the way people compare products and services -- and that is good for everyone who shops."
- Antitrust laws -
A Google spokesman meanwhile told AFP: "We don't agree with the court's decision, we are reviewing and will consider our legal options. The changes we made to shopping ads back in 2017 are working successfully."
Pricerunner filed its suit following a European Union General Court ruling that Google "breached EU antitrust laws by manipulating search results in favour of their own comparison shopping services".
The trial began in October last year, and a ruling was first scheduled for April 15 but was delayed several times due to the complexity of the case.
Originally, Pricerunner said it was suing Google for around $2 billion but said at the time it expected the "final damages amount of the lawsuit to be significantly higher" given that "the violation is still ongoing".
The European Union General Court in 2021 upheld a 2017 European Commission ruling "that Google had violated competition law by favouring its own shopping service".
The ruling was then upheld again in 2024 by the EU Court of Justice.
- Continued abuse -
In the Swedish case, the court noted that Google had argued that the violation ended in 2017, while Pricerunner had argued that it continued after 2017 and up until at least 2023.
Pontus Scherp, the lawyer representing Pricerunner, told AFP ahead of Wednesday's ruling that his team had argued that the changes Google implemented in 2017 were "mostly cosmetic".
The court found that "Google's abuse continued for longer than Google had claimed, and that the abuse caused Pricerunner harm."
However, the court also said that part of the claim had been brought too late and it was also not awarding Pricerunner any compensation for "ongoing harm" after the abuse stopped.
"The judgment shows that competition law provides real protection for companies that suffer harm as a result of competition law infringements committed by dominant firms such as Google," Scherp said in a comment after the ruling.
Scherp said he thought it should be "highlighted that the court found that Google never ceased its infringement" following the EU commission's decision.
The damages awarded for the period Google was deemed at fault -- 15 years in the UK and 10 years in Sweden and Denmark -- were also lower than what Pricerunner had requested, he noted.
H.E.Young--AMWN