-
'Act before it's too late': Tokyo residents fight for more trees
-
World records prove Asian Games were a hit, says top official
-
'Disappointing' as South Korea flag mishap sees Games end on sour note
-
US prison chief who oversaw botched execution resigns
-
Pre-COP host Tuvalu at frontline of climate change
-
'Chaotic' Asian Games threaten Japan hopes of hosting Olympics again
-
Hungary's dwindling paprika producers battle to save signature spice
-
Finnish town braces for change from Google data centres
-
Cornell president vows review in wake of alleged student gang rape
-
What is fuelling French school protests?
-
Latvian partial election results suggest pro-European choice
-
Without lawyers, migrant children face deportation from the US
-
In Egypt's Sinai, Gazan builds school for children displaced by war
-
Three-peat seeking Dodgers open playoffs with a win, Rays hold off Yankees
-
Trump tariffs a mixed bag for US auto industry
-
Brazil votes in nail-biter polls closely watched by Trump
-
Yemen government forces say struck Houthi targets
-
'Just be you': Kim reveals Tiger text that inspired him to gold
-
Music links past, present for Pedro Pascal's cellist in 'Behemoth!'
-
Myanmar migrants returned to war-torn nation from Malaysia
-
ALEX BODI ȘI AMBASADORUL REPUBLICII SUDANUL DE SUD, GUM DOMINIC MATIOK, DISCUTĂ LA BERLIN DESPRE POSIBILITATEA ÎNFIINȚĂRII UNUI CONSULAT ONORIFIC LA BUCUREȘTI
-
ALEX BODI AND AMBASSADOR GUM DOMINIC MATIOK OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN MEET IN BERLIN TO DISCUSS THE POSSIBILITY OF AN HONORARY CONSULATE IN BUCHAREST
-
Dodgers step up World Series three-peat bid with 5-3 win over Braves
-
Lula, Bolsonaro wrap up campaigns ahead of Brazil's knife-edge vote
-
Spain break down Czechs as England outclass Croatia in Nations League
-
Toulouse edge Castres in Top 14 derby
-
Yamal on target as Spain hold off Czech Republic
-
Murakami homer propels White Sox to MLB playoff win over Guardians
-
Latvian exit polls suggest pro-European choice
-
Israel targets top Hamas leader in deadly Gaza strike on anniversary
-
Lula, Bolsonaro wrap up campaigns ahead of knife-edge election
-
Houthis say struck oil facility near Riyadh, as Saudis hit Sanaa
-
Tuchel hails 'complete' England after Croatia demolition
-
AI needs safety layers like nuclear plants: ex-OpenAI engineer
-
Fury to invite Trump to lead ring walk before Joshua showdown
-
MVP Judge will miss Yankees' MLB playoff series against Rays
-
Fashion industry in 'precarious moment', says Vivienne Westwood supremo
-
New lizard species discovered in Peru
-
Seventh heaven for England in Nations League rout of Croatia
-
Fernandes hails Portugal's 'greatest symbol' Ronaldo, calls for unity
-
Storms, flooding cause chaos on Greek holiday island of Crete
-
Grandidier-Nkanang double takes Pau to Top 14 summit despite Vannes fightback
-
#IAmJaneDoe: online support campaign in US university rape case
-
Trainer Scott gets perfect Arc boost with top notch double
-
Brazil shine on Selecao's first visit to India
-
Ex-PM says Putin cannot admit 'mistake' over Ukraine
-
Zverev sets up Djokovic quarter-final at China Open, Rybakina out
-
Houthis say Saudi Arabia launches dozens of strikes on Yemen capital
-
Happier at home, Bordeaux hammer Lyon in Top 14
-
Qatar and Abu Dhabi F1 Grand Prix to go ahead - F1 boss
US top court sidesteps ruling on contentious social media laws
The US Supreme Court on Monday ordered lower courts to review a pair of Republican-backed laws that imposed restrictions on social media content moderation, in a decision welcomed by the tech industry.
Tech industry trade groups had challenged the laws passed by conservative Republican lawmakers in Florida and Texas in a bid to stem what they claimed was political bias by major platforms.
The Supreme Court declined to rule on whether it was constitutional for states to pass legislation that limit the powers of social media companies to moderate their content, leaving the two laws in limbo as the lower courts conduct their review.
Florida's measure bars social media platforms from pulling content from politicians, a law that was passed after former president Donald Trump was suspended from Twitter and Facebook in the wake of the January 6, 2021 assault on the US Capitol.
In Texas, the law stops sites from pulling content based on a "viewpoint" and is also intended to thwart what conservatives see as censorship by tech platforms such as Facebook and YouTube against right-wing ideas.
Neither law has gone into effect due to the litigation.
The challenge was brought by associations representing big tech companies, the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) and NetChoice, who argue that the First Amendment allows platforms to have the freedom to handle content as they see fit.
"We are encouraged that a majority of the Court has made clear that the government cannot tilt public debate in its favored direction," CCIA president Matt Schruers said in a statement.
"There is nothing more Orwellian than government attempting to dictate what speech should be carried, whether it is a newspaper or a social media site."
The decision was also welcomed by tech advocacy groups.
"The government does not have the right to impose rules on how companies like Meta and Google should accomplish" content moderation, said Nora Benavidez, senior counsel at the watchdog Free Press.
"These laws would have further ratcheted up the amount of hate and disinformation online while undermining both the meaning and the intent of the First Amendment," she added.
Monday's decision comes after the Supreme Court last week rejected a Republican-led bid to curb government contact with social media companies to moderate their content.
The decision handed a win to President Joe Biden's administration and top government agencies ahead of the presidential vote in November, allowing them to continue notifying major platforms including Facebook and X about what they deem as false or hateful content.
Y.Kobayashi--AMWN