-
England's Banton at home in first World Cup after stop-start career
-
Australia's Aiava slams 'hostile' tennis culture in retirement post
-
Nepal recover from 46-5 to post 133-8 against West Indies
-
Emotional Kim captures first title in 16 years at LIV Adelaide
-
Exiled Kremlin critic on fighting Putin -- and cancer -- from abroad
-
Berlinale filmmakers make creative leaps over location obstacles
-
I want answers from my ex-husband, Gisele Pelicot tells AFP
-
Interpol backroom warriors fight cyber criminals 'weaponising' AI
-
New world for users and brands as ads hit AI chatbots
-
Japan's 'godless' lake warns of creeping climate change
-
US teen Lutkenhaus breaks world junior indoor 800m record
-
World copper rush promises new riches for Zambia
-
Paw patrol: Larry the cat marks 15 years at 10 Downing Street
-
India plans AI 'data city' on staggering scale
-
Jamaica's Thompson-Herah runs first race since 2024
-
Crash course: Vietnam's crypto boom goes bust
-
Ahead of Oscars, Juliette Binoche hails strength of Cannes winners
-
US cattle farmers caught between high costs and weary consumers
-
New York creatives squeezed out by high cost of living
-
Lillard matches NBA 3-point contest mark in injury return
-
NBA mulling 'every possible remedy' as 'tanking' worsens
-
Team USA men see off dogged Denmark in Olympic ice hockey
-
'US-versus-World' All-Star Game divides NBA players
-
Top seed Fritz beats Cilic to reach ATP Dallas Open final
-
Lens run riot to reclaim top spot in Ligue 1, Marseille slip up
-
Last-gasp Zielinski effort keeps Inter at Serie A summit
-
Vinicius bags brace as Real Madrid take Liga lead, end Sociedad run
-
Liverpool beat Brighton, Man City oust Beckham's Salford from FA Cup
-
Australia celebrate best-ever Winter Olympics after Anthony wins dual moguls
-
Townsend becomes a fan again as Scotland stun England in Six Nations
-
France's Macron urges calm after right-wing youth fatally beaten
-
China's freeski star Gu recovers from crash to reach Olympic big air final
-
Charli XCX 'honoured' to be at 'political' Berlin Film Festival
-
Relatives of Venezuela political prisoners begin hunger strike
-
Trump's 'desire' to own Greenland persists: Danish PM
-
European debate over nuclear weapons gains pace
-
Newcastle oust 10-man Villa from FA Cup, Man City beat Beckham's Salford
-
Auger-Aliassime swats aside Bublik to power into Rotterdam final
-
French prosecutors announce special team for Epstein files
-
Tuipulotu 'beyond proud' as Scotland stun England
-
Jones strikes twice as Scotland end England's unbeaten run in style
-
American Stolz wins second Olympic gold in speed skating
-
Marseille start life after De Zerbi with Strasbourg draw
-
ECB to extend euro backstop to boost currency's global role
-
Canada warned after 'F-bomb' Olympics curling exchange with Sweden
-
Ultra-wealthy behaving badly in surreal Berlin premiere
-
250,000 at rally in Germany demand 'game over' for Iran's leaders
-
UK to deploy aircraft carrier group to Arctic this year: PM
-
Zelensky labels Putin a 'slave to war'
-
Resurgent Muchova beats Mboko in Qatar final to end title drought
US top court sidesteps ruling on contentious social media laws
The US Supreme Court on Monday ordered lower courts to review a pair of Republican-backed laws that imposed restrictions on social media content moderation, in a decision welcomed by the tech industry.
Tech industry trade groups had challenged the laws passed by conservative Republican lawmakers in Florida and Texas in a bid to stem what they claimed was political bias by major platforms.
The Supreme Court declined to rule on whether it was constitutional for states to pass legislation that limit the powers of social media companies to moderate their content, leaving the two laws in limbo as the lower courts conduct their review.
Florida's measure bars social media platforms from pulling content from politicians, a law that was passed after former president Donald Trump was suspended from Twitter and Facebook in the wake of the January 6, 2021 assault on the US Capitol.
In Texas, the law stops sites from pulling content based on a "viewpoint" and is also intended to thwart what conservatives see as censorship by tech platforms such as Facebook and YouTube against right-wing ideas.
Neither law has gone into effect due to the litigation.
The challenge was brought by associations representing big tech companies, the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) and NetChoice, who argue that the First Amendment allows platforms to have the freedom to handle content as they see fit.
"We are encouraged that a majority of the Court has made clear that the government cannot tilt public debate in its favored direction," CCIA president Matt Schruers said in a statement.
"There is nothing more Orwellian than government attempting to dictate what speech should be carried, whether it is a newspaper or a social media site."
The decision was also welcomed by tech advocacy groups.
"The government does not have the right to impose rules on how companies like Meta and Google should accomplish" content moderation, said Nora Benavidez, senior counsel at the watchdog Free Press.
"These laws would have further ratcheted up the amount of hate and disinformation online while undermining both the meaning and the intent of the First Amendment," she added.
Monday's decision comes after the Supreme Court last week rejected a Republican-led bid to curb government contact with social media companies to moderate their content.
The decision handed a win to President Joe Biden's administration and top government agencies ahead of the presidential vote in November, allowing them to continue notifying major platforms including Facebook and X about what they deem as false or hateful content.
Y.Kobayashi--AMWN