
-
Bleak future for Rohingya, as Bangladesh seeks to tackle crisis
-
Cambodia MPs pass law allowing stripping of citizenship
-
What to look for at the Venice Film Festival
-
Venice welcomes Julia Roberts, George Clooney to film festival
-
Djokovic voices physical concerns after US Open win
-
Olympic Council of Asia says Saudi Winter Games 'on schedule'
-
Asian markets rise on US rate cut hopes
-
Vietnam evacuates tens of thousands ahead of Typhoon Kajiki
-
Sabalenka into US Open second round, Djokovic off the mark
-
Australian mushroom meal survivor says 'half alive' after wife's killing
-
SpaceX calls off Starship megarocket launch in latest setback
-
Djokovic shrugs off blisters to advance at US Open
-
Israeli strikes in Yemen's capital kill six, Huthis say
-
UN Security Council to vote on embattled Lebanon peacekeepers
-
Egyptian farmers behind world's perfumes face climate fight alone
-
'Life-long dream': Oasis kicks off North American tour in Toronto
-
Australia's mushroom murderer faces victims' family in court
-
Liberty Home Loans Support Women Stepping into Property Investment
-
SpaceX cancels Starship megarocket launch in latest setback
-
'Over the moon': Filipino Eala bags historic first at US Open
-
'Big brother' Giroud strikes late to lift Lille past Monaco
-
Fleetwood triumphs at Tour Championship for elusive first PGA Tour title
-
Mbappe fires Madrid to victory at Real Oviedo
-
Giroud strikes late to lift Lille past Monaco, Rennes implode early at Lorient
-
Row breaks out as US diplomat criticises France on antisemitism
-
Israeli bulldozers uproot hundreds of trees in West Bank village
-
David strikes on Serie A debut as Juve ease past Parma
-
Sabalenka into US Open second round as Fritz, Shelton advance
-
Israeli strikes in Yemen's capital kill four, Huthis say
-
England's Botterman aiming to be world's 'best loosehead prop'
-
Kneecap defy critics with 'Free Palestine' chant at Paris gig
-
New Zealand start Women's Rugby World Cup defence by downing battling Spain
-
Winless Man Utd need to 'grow up', says Amorim
-
Shelton romps into US Open second round
-
Kneecap defy objectors with 'Free Palestine' chant at Paris gig
-
US envoy criticises France's lack of action over antisemitism
-
Trump clashes with Democrats as he expands National Guard plans
-
Raducanu cruises to first US Open win since 2021 triumph
-
Man Utd still winless after Fulham draw, Everton win to open new stadium
-
Hamburg draws blank on Bundesliga return
-
Spain heatwave was 'most intense on record'
-
Chaotic Rennes set Ligue 1 red card record and lose 4-0 at Lorient
-
Russia and Ukraine exchange POWs, civilians
-
Moyes sees big step forward after Everton win stadium opener
-
Vingegaard wins on Vuelta mountain to take overall lead
-
Vingegaard wins on Vuelta mountain
-
Zelensky calls for Putin talks as peace efforts stall
-
Everton beat Brighton in new stadium opener
-
Higgins strikes as Ireland see off Japan in Women's Rugby World Cup
-
Fires ravage an ageing rural Spain

US top court sidesteps ruling on contentious social media laws
The US Supreme Court on Monday ordered lower courts to review a pair of Republican-backed laws that imposed restrictions on social media content moderation, in a decision welcomed by the tech industry.
Tech industry trade groups had challenged the laws passed by conservative Republican lawmakers in Florida and Texas in a bid to stem what they claimed was political bias by major platforms.
The Supreme Court declined to rule on whether it was constitutional for states to pass legislation that limit the powers of social media companies to moderate their content, leaving the two laws in limbo as the lower courts conduct their review.
Florida's measure bars social media platforms from pulling content from politicians, a law that was passed after former president Donald Trump was suspended from Twitter and Facebook in the wake of the January 6, 2021 assault on the US Capitol.
In Texas, the law stops sites from pulling content based on a "viewpoint" and is also intended to thwart what conservatives see as censorship by tech platforms such as Facebook and YouTube against right-wing ideas.
Neither law has gone into effect due to the litigation.
The challenge was brought by associations representing big tech companies, the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) and NetChoice, who argue that the First Amendment allows platforms to have the freedom to handle content as they see fit.
"We are encouraged that a majority of the Court has made clear that the government cannot tilt public debate in its favored direction," CCIA president Matt Schruers said in a statement.
"There is nothing more Orwellian than government attempting to dictate what speech should be carried, whether it is a newspaper or a social media site."
The decision was also welcomed by tech advocacy groups.
"The government does not have the right to impose rules on how companies like Meta and Google should accomplish" content moderation, said Nora Benavidez, senior counsel at the watchdog Free Press.
"These laws would have further ratcheted up the amount of hate and disinformation online while undermining both the meaning and the intent of the First Amendment," she added.
Monday's decision comes after the Supreme Court last week rejected a Republican-led bid to curb government contact with social media companies to moderate their content.
The decision handed a win to President Joe Biden's administration and top government agencies ahead of the presidential vote in November, allowing them to continue notifying major platforms including Facebook and X about what they deem as false or hateful content.
Y.Kobayashi--AMWN