-
Teatro Mayor Unveils 152-Performance 2027 Season Highlighting Beethoven and García Márquez
-
The Dilemma of Recording Live Music: Preserving Memories vs. Being Present
-
Rutgers Defeats NJIT 101-64 Behind Francis and Mark Scores
-
Christmas Day Shifts More than Double as Americans Return to In-Person Holiday Celebrations
-
THIEAUDIO Introduces Clairvoyance MKII: The Evolution of a Signature Sound
-
Fulcrum Metals PLC Announces Publication of Updated Investor Presentation
-
Guardian Metal Resources PLC Announces Proposed Spin-Out of Non-Tungsten Projects
-
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC Announces Transaction in Own Shares - November 11
-
Fulcrum Metals PLC Announces New Critical Mineral Recoveries Expand Potential
-
6 Pieces of Furniture Worth Investing In
-
Thukukile Zuma Resigns from ANC Johannesburg Leadership Amid Disciplinary Dispute
-
Russia Orders 100,000 Kometa Modules to Counter Ukrainian Electronic Warfare
-
CM Mohan Yadav Meets Bohra Spiritual Leader to Discuss Simhastha 2028 and Development
-
Mahayuti-backed Rajesh Patil Elected Chairman of Gokul Dairy Amidst Political Deadlock
-
Eli Crane Defeats Jonathan Nez in Tight Arizona Congressional Race
-
David Walliams Identified as Celebrity in Sexual Misconduct Allegations After Legal Bid
Rich EU consumers 'outsource' environmental impact to poorer neighbours
Consumption patterns in wealthy European Union countries are having detrimental environmental impacts in poorer EU nations, a study Thursday found, exposing harmful inequalities on the continent.
The study looked at 10 key environmental impacts -- including greenhouse gas emissions, toxins in water and soil, air pollution and land use -- in supply chain countries and stacked them up against GDP levels in EU nations.
The negative impacts went beyond Europe -- Brazil, China, India and Japan were included -- but the most striking findings were on the continent.
"There are huge inequalities between the EU, and that was the surprising thing," said the study's co-author Klaus Hubacek from the University of Groningen in the Netherlands.
Poorer countries within the EU were affected, but also non-EU countries like Albania, Montenegro, Serbia, Ukraine and Moldova, said the study, published Thursday in Nature Sustainability.
"Eastern Europe consistently ranked as the region receiving the lowest share of economic value added compared to environmental pressures and impacts associated with EU consumption," the press release said.
The researchers studied a "giant matrix" of data from 1995 to 2019, Hubacek said, examining GDP growth related to consumption of things like food, clothing, manufactured products and services, compared to environmental impact.
They found that wealthier European nations saw a positive GDP impact, while "outsourcing" environmental impact to places providing consumer goods.
The impacts "increased notably outside the EU, while decreasing within the bloc," the study said.
Some of the environmental impacts come down to lax environmental laws in poorer countries, or reliance on older technologies and equipment that could be harmful or more polluting -- some of which would not be allowed in EU countries.
The impact was also seen within the EU.
Agricultural producers Spain and Greece, for example, saw disproportionate impacts on water, biodiversity and land use compared to the economic benefits from producing goods largely exported beyond their borders.
"It's a fascinating part of the picture that we have rich and poor, and winners and losers, within countries and regions," Hubacek told AFP.
He said consumers could shift consumption patterns -- eating less inexpensive meat from countries with lax environmental laws, for example -- but also called on the EU to roll out tougher import rules.
The research was initiated by Greenpeace, which wanted to examine the impact of the EU's Green Deal climate plan.
F.Dubois--AMWN