-
US vows 'economic asphyxiation' of Iran with new sanctions
-
Saudi Arabia to invest $7 bn in theme parks near Paris: French presidency
-
French tourist dies after getting stuck in scorching Death Valley
-
Vuelta stage three abandoned in dangerous weather conditions
-
US proposes expanding UN Sudan arms embargo to entire country
-
Banned Vondrousova appeals doping suspension to CAS
-
Ceasefire verification mission heads to east DR Congo
-
Ukraine's allies pledge to continue support despite Russian threats
-
Carse dropped from England squad after nightclub incident
-
France readies high school phone ban for next month
-
Empire State Building climbers kiss outside court after viral proposal
-
Trump says to double tariffs on Canada autos as trade fight heats up
-
French poll shows Le Pen's biggest challenger may be hard left's Melenchon
-
Noosha Aubel: Hur mycket administrativt misslyckande tål Potsdam till?
-
Noosha Aubel: Πόση διοικητική αποτυχία μπορεί να αντέξει ακόμα το Πότσδαμ?
-
WeGolden Receives Best Gold Trading Platform Asia 2026 Recognition from TrustFinance Awards
-
WeMasterTrade Receives Best Instant Prop APAC 2026 Recognition from TrustFinance Awards
-
BtcDana Wins “Best Customer Support Experience – CFD Broker 2026” at the TrustFinance Performance Awards
-
MH Markets Recognized as Most Transparent Broker at the TrustFinance Awards 2026
-
Belgian pie-thrower, scourge of celebrities, dies at 80
-
Stocks, oil slip ahead of US threat of economic war against Iran
-
Eto'o urges support for embattled FIFA president Infantino
-
Trump claims Iran 'collapsing' as US threatens 'economic D-Day'
-
India in driver's seat in second Sri Lanka Test
-
Noosha Aubel: Kolik administrativních selhání ještě Potsdam snese?
-
Noosha Aubel: Ile jeszcze nieudolności administracyjnej wytrzyma Poczdam?
-
नूशा ऑबेल: पॉट्सडैम और कितनी प्रशासनिक विफलता सहन कर सकता है?
-
ヌーシャ・オーベル:ポツダムは、あとどれだけの行政の失態に耐えられるのか?
-
누샤 아우벨: 포츠담은 행정 실패를 얼마나 더 견뎌낼 수 있을까?
-
努莎·奧貝爾:波茨坦還能承受多少行政失職?
-
نوشا أوبيل: إلى أي مدى ستتحمل بوتسدام المزيد من الفشل الإداري؟
-
Нуша Аубель: Скільки ще Потсдам витримає адміністративних провалів?
-
Нуша Аубель: Сколько ещё Потсдам сможет выдержать административных провалов?
-
Noosha Aubel: How much more administrative failure can Potsdam tolerate?
-
Despair and anger in Conakry after deadly landfill collapse
-
Liverpool must improve on 'unacceptable' season, says Van Dijk
-
OSCE says Kazakh elections lacked choice after ruling party wins landslide
-
UK PM dismisses Russian threats as Ukraine allies gather in Kyiv
-
India declare on 503-9 after Jurel hundred
-
Attacks on Red Cross in DR Congo making Ebola fight 'harder'
-
Kremlin says UK preventing peace by giving missile info to Ukraine
-
Oil falls ahead of US plan for economic war on Iran
-
Springboks change half-backs for second All Blacks Test
-
Millions of Teslas recalled in China over door handle safety
-
Jurel hits 95 not out as India reach 475-8 at tea in Sri Lanka Test
-
IUX Launches New Education Webinar Series to Support Traders’ Financial Literacy
-
Ingebrigtsen buoyed by fourth in Diamond League comeback
-
Dutch say won't participate in 'no longer' neutral Eurovision
-
Kenyans get creative to join manga cosplay craze
-
Kenyan farmers turn to bugs as organic demand grows
Shell to take hit of up to $5 bn on Russia exit
British energy giant Shell warned Thursday that it would take a hit of up to $5 billion (4.6 billion euros) on its exit from Russia, following Moscow's invasion of Ukraine.
Impairment from assets and additional charges relating to Russia activities were expected to be between $4 billion and $5 billion in the first quarter, Shell said in a statement after recently signalling its gradual withdrawal.
The news comes after the London-listed energy major announced in late February that it would sell its stakes in all joint ventures with Russian state energy giant Gazprom after the Kremlin launched its assault on Ukraine.
The group said at the time that the ventures were worth about $3 billion.
Shell then announced in March that it would withdraw from Russian gas and oil in line with UK government policy, and also immediately stopped purchases of its crude on the spot market.
The company had also apologised for buying a cargo of Russian oil at a vast discount, adding that it should not have happened.
However, Shell revealed Thursday that it would continue to fulfil contracts on buying fuel from Russia that had been signed before the Ukraine war.
"Shell has not renewed longer-term contracts for Russian oil, and will only do so under explicit government direction, but we are legally obliged to take delivery of crude bought under contracts that were signed before the invasion," it said in the statement.
And the group warned that the state of global oil markets remains "volatile" after prices rocketed to near record levels last month on the back of the conflict.
Britain, which is far less dependent than the rest of Europe on Russian energy, plans to phase out oil imports by the end of the year and eventually stop importing its gas.
A wide range of international companies have stopped doing business in Russia since President Vladimir Putin ordered the invasion of Ukraine on February 24.
- Oil prices jump -
Shell's main rival BP has also announced its departure.
BP said in late February that it would pull its 19.75-percent stake in state energy giant Rosneft, ending more than three decades of investment in Russia.
Shell's first-quarter earnings are scheduled for publication on May 5.
It had swung back into massive profit last year, as oil and gas prices jumped on recovering demand and geopolitical unrest.
Net profit stood at $20.1 billion after a loss after tax of $21.7 billion in 2020, as economies reopened from pandemic lockdowns.
The Ukraine crisis then sent shockwaves across the global oil market because Russia is a major producer.
Oil prices rocketed close to record levels of close to $140 per barrel in early March, although they have since fallen back to around $100 on peace talk hopes.
Shell this year switched headquarters from the Netherlands to Britain after a century and dropped Royal Dutch from its name, in a move aimed at simplifying tax and share arrangements.
G.Stevens--AMWN