-
Spurs must banish 'loser' mentality despite injury woes, says De Zerbi
-
Arsenal must manage emotions of title race says Arteta
-
Nepal temple celebrates return of stolen Buddha statue
-
US Fed official says rate hikes may be needed if inflation surges
-
Fixture pile-up no excuse for Man City in title race: Guardiola
-
Iran offers new proposal amid stalled US peace talks
-
Gulf countries' plans to bypass Hormuz still far off, experts warn
-
Luis Enrique says 'unique' PSG-Bayern first leg could have gone either way
-
Rebels take key military camp in Mali's north
-
Activists on Gaza aid flotilla seized by Israeli forces disembark in Crete
-
Turkish police fire tear gas, arrest hundreds at Istanbul May Day rallies
-
French hub monitors Hormuz tensions from afar
-
Flick happy Raphinha back for Barca with title in sight
-
UN troubled by rejected appeal of Cambodian opposition leader
-
Activists on Gaza aid flotilla detained by Israel disembark in Crete
-
Suspect appears in UK court charged with attacking two Jewish men
-
Oil steady after wild swing, stocks diverge in thin trading
-
Lufthansa says searching for Oscar lost after US airport security row
-
Howe says Saudi backers are fully behind Newcastle
-
Chinese swimmer Sun Yang reports cyberbullying to police
-
Salah 'deserves big send-off', says Liverpool boss Slot
-
UK police charge man with stabbing attack on two Jewish Londoners
-
Solomon Islands leader loses court appeal, must face no confidence vote
-
Former world skating champion Uno joins pro eSports team
-
Japan baseball umpire hit by bat still unconscious two weeks on
-
Nakatani says won't be intimidated in sold-out Inoue title clash
-
T-Wolves eliminate Nuggets as Knicks demolish Hawks in NBA playoffs
-
Timberwolves eliminate Jokic's Nuggets from NBA playoffs
-
Iran activates air defences as Trump faces congressional deadline
-
Arsenal seek to ramp up heat on Man City in title race
-
PSG closing in on another French title before Bayern second leg
-
Espanyol must stop rot against Real Madrid as Barca eye title
-
Leipzig can book return to Champions League as Bundesliga top-four rivals meet
-
Injuries add to Bath's challenge for Champions Cup semi in Bordeaux
-
Karius getting 'back to the top' with promotion-chasing Schalke
-
King Charles arrives in Bermuda after whirlwind US visit
-
Clashes erupt in Australian town over death of Indigenous girl
-
Iran war redraws sea routes with Africa as the pivot
-
India's cows offer biogas alternative to Mideast energy crunch
-
Afghans celebrate spring in bright red poppy fields
-
Finland's 'Flamethrower' and 4 other Eurovision favourites
-
Crude edges up after wild swing, stocks track Wall St rally
-
Eurovision: 70 years of geopolitics, patriotism, music and glitter
-
Knicks demolish Hawks to advance in NBA playoffs
-
Blockbuster EU-Mercosur trade deal enters into force
-
'Uncharted': US court ruling shakes up battle for Congress
-
Florida executes man who spent nearly 50 years on death row
-
Ace lifts rookie Green to share of LPGA lead as Korda lurks
-
Wear a bulletproof vest? I don't want to look fat, says Trump
-
Medical Care Technologies (OTC:MDCE) Targets $100K Per Client with Real Game Used Disruptive AI Platform
Supreme Court Case Could Change How the IRS Collects Civil Penalties - Clear Start Tax Explains What Hirsch v. US Tax Court Means for Taxpayers
A pending Supreme Court petition could reshape IRS penalty enforcement by testing whether taxpayers have a constitutional right to a jury trial before civil penalties are imposed.
IRVINE, CA / ACCESS Newswire / May 1, 2026 / A case quietly advancing toward the United States Supreme Court has the potential to fundamentally alter how the Internal Revenue Service assesses and collects civil tax penalties. The case - Hirsch v. US Tax Court - raises a question rooted in the Seventh Amendment: whether taxpayers facing substantial IRS civil penalties are entitled to a jury trial before those penalties become enforceable. For the millions of Americans currently dealing with IRS penalty assessments, the outcome could shift the balance of power between taxpayers and the agency.
"This is not a narrow procedural dispute," said a spokesperson for Clear Start Tax, a national tax relief and resolution firm. "If the Court determines that taxpayers have a Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial for civil penalties, it would introduce an entirely new layer of due process into IRS enforcement - one that could slow collections significantly and give taxpayers more leverage in disputes."
The Seventh Amendment preserves the right to a jury trial in civil cases where the value in controversy exceeds twenty dollars. For decades, IRS civil penalty disputes have been adjudicated exclusively within the United States Tax Court, where judges - not juries - decide outcomes. The petitioners in Hirsch argue this structure violates the constitutional guarantee, particularly when penalties can reach tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars. The IRS imposes a wide range of civil penalties, including failure-to-file penalties up to 25 percent, accuracy-related penalties of 20 percent, and fraud penalties as high as 75 percent of the underpayment.
A favorable ruling would not eliminate IRS civil penalties, but it could dramatically change enforcement. If jury trials become available for penalty disputes, the IRS would face higher litigation costs, longer timelines, and the unpredictability of jury verdicts. Analysts suggest the agency could become more selective in which cases it pursues and more willing to negotiate settlements.
"For taxpayers currently facing penalty assessments, this case is worth watching closely," the spokesperson added. "Even if the ruling does not apply retroactively, the legal reasoning could open new avenues for challenging penalties that were imposed without adequate procedural safeguards."
However, taxpayers should not delay addressing their current situations in anticipation of a ruling. The timeline for the Court to grant certiorari, hear arguments, and issue an opinion could extend into 2027, and penalties and interest continue to accrue regardless. Clear Start Tax recommends that affected taxpayers take the following steps now:
Request penalty abatement through reasonable cause or first-time abatement programs to reduce or eliminate assessed penalties.
Explore installment agreements for structured monthly payment plans if the full balance cannot be paid at once.
Evaluate eligibility for an offer in compromise to potentially settle tax debt for less than the full amount owed.
Consult a tax professional to assess whether current penalty assessments may be subject to future legal challenges.
By answering a few simple questions, taxpayers can find out if they're eligible for the IRS Fresh Start Program and take the first step toward resolving their tax debt.
"Constitutional cases move slowly, but IRS collections do not," said the spokesperson. "The most important thing a taxpayer can do right now is take action on the debt they currently face - whether that means requesting penalty abatement, negotiating a payment plan, or exploring an offer in compromise."
About Clear Start Tax
Clear Start Tax is a nationwide tax resolution and relief firm specializing in helping individuals and businesses address IRS and state tax issues. With a team of experienced tax professionals, the company provides tailored strategies for resolving back taxes, negotiating settlements, and achieving long-term compliance.
Need Help With Back Taxes?
Click the link below:
https://clearstarttax.com/qualifytoday/
(888) 710-3533
Contact Information
Clear Start Tax
Corporate Communications Department
[email protected]
(949) 800-4011
SOURCE: Clear Start Tax
View the original press release on ACCESS Newswire
Ch.Havering--AMWN