-
Djibouti counts votes as leader seeks sixth term
-
Parachutes: A vital part of Artemis II's trip home
-
Michael Jackson fans swarm Berlin for biopic premiere
-
Iran sets conditions as Vance warns Tehran not to 'play' US at talks
-
Trump says Iran has 'no cards' beyond Hormuz control
-
Israeli strike in south Lebanon kills 13 security personnel
-
Will The Wise wins Topham as tragedy strikes Gold Dancer
-
Over 100,000 worshippers perform Friday prayers at Al-Aqsa
-
Teen star Seixas claims stage five to close on Basque Tour victory
-
War's impact on fertilisers stirs food producer fears
-
US inflation surges to 3.3% as Iran war impact bites
-
Thais fete new year with family despite fuel price spike
-
Scheffler scrambles, Rose stumbles early at Masters
-
On Iran truce, all sides want bigger China role, but does China?
-
Sinner eases into Monte Carlo semi-final against Zverev
-
Inter skipper Martinez suffers calf injury
-
Ukrainians sceptical as Kremlin orders Easter truce
-
Arteta urges Arsenal to pile pressure on Man City in title race
-
Pay fears grow for US security workers in shutdown
-
Hungary rivals rally crowds in closing strait of election campaign
-
Swede goes on trial for pressuring wife to sell sex
-
US inflation surges 3.3% as Iran war impact bites
-
Vance warns Iran not to 'play' US at talks in Pakistan
-
Fernandez remains out despite apology: Chelsea boss Rosenior
-
Dortmund defender Schlotterbeck extends contract until 2031
-
De Zerbi vows to save troubled Spurs from relegation
-
Antwerp port reopens to North Sea shipping after oil spill
-
Stocks mixed, oil steadies on guarded optimism for Iran ceasefire
-
Sinner eases into Monte Carlo semi-finals
-
France's Macron talks war, peace and basketball with Pope Leo
-
Fernandez apologised over comments about his future: Chelsea's Rosenior
-
Coach Spalletti signs new Juve deal until 2028
-
AI chatbots offer children harm as if it were help, says activist
-
'Grumpy' Guardiola wants Silva to stay at Man City for life
-
Zverev beats Fonseca to reach Monte Carlo semi-finals
-
Scheffler, Rose to chase McIlroy with early Masters starts
-
Celine Dion's Paris concerts promise to spin the money on and on
-
Stocks climb, oil steadies on guarded optimism over Iran war ceasefire
-
Irish govt to meet farmers, hauliers over fuel cost fears
-
Injured Bayern starlet Karl to miss Real return leg
-
US-Iran talks in Pakistan uncertain as sides trade accusations
-
Oil spill snarls shipping traffic in Antwerp port
-
Giving birth in a shelter in Israel
-
Five things to know about the planned Iran-US talks in Islamabad
-
Slot feels 'complete support' from Liverpool chiefs despite slump
-
Kyiv books tentative diplomatic coup with Iran war forays
-
Teenager shines as Britain seize control of BJK Cup tie with Australia
-
Chinese, Taiwanese will unite, Xi tells Taiwan opposition leader
-
Sleepy seal diverts traffic in Australian seaside town
-
Artemis astronauts to shed light on space health risks
Austria set to vote on headscarf ban in schools
Austrian lawmakers on Thursday are expected to approve a law banning headscarves in schools for girls under 14, a move rights groups and experts say is discriminatory and could deepen societal division.
Austria's conservative-led government -- under pressure at a time when anti-immigration sentiment is running high -- proposed the ban earlier this year. They argue it is to protect girls "from oppression".
In 2019, when the country introduced a ban on headscarves in primary schools, the constitutional court struck it down, calling it unconstitutional and discriminatory. This time however, the government insists that its law is constitutional.
The law, if passed, would prevent girls younger than 14 from wearing headscarves that "cover the head in accordance with Islamic traditions" in all schools.
"When a girl... is told that she must hide her body... to protect herself from the gaze of men, it's not a religious ritual, but oppression," Integration Minister Claudia Plakolm said when presenting the bill.
The ban, which applies to "all forms" of the Islamic veil including hijabs and burqas, would take full effect with the start of the new school year in September, Plakolm said.
From February, an initial period would be launched during which the new rules would be explained to educators, parents and children with no penalties for breaking them.
But for repeated non-compliance, parents would face fines ranging from 150 to 800 euros ($175-930).
The government said that about 12,000 girls would be affected by the new law, basing its figures on a 2019 study that showed that approximately 3,000 girls aged below 14 wore a headscarf six years ago.
- 'Stigmatised' -
Rights organisations have criticised the bill, including Amnesty International Austria.
Amnesty said it "constitutes blatant discrimination against Muslim girls" and described it as an "expression of anti-Muslim racism".
Such measures risk "fuelling existing prejudices and stereotypes against Muslims", the group warned.
The draft law has also drawn criticism from the IGGOe, the body officially recognised as representing the country's Muslim communities.
It said the ban "jeopardises social cohesion", saying "instead of empowering children, they are stigmatised and marginalised".
Angelika Atzinger, managing director of the Amazone women's rights association, said a headscarf ban "sends girls the message that decisions are being made about their bodies and that this is legitimate".
Her comments appeared in a statement published by the anti-racism group SOS Mitmensch, which also opposes the proposed law.
Austria's anti-immigration, far-right Freedom Party (FPOe), which won last year's general election but failed to form a government, said the ban did not go far enough. They want it extended to all students, teachers and other staff.
The governing coalition said it was confident the revised ban would not be overturned a second time.
It argued that the law provides for such restrictions if the rights of a child, which are enshrined in the constitution, would otherwise be infringed upon.
But constitutional law expert Heinz Mayer has raised doubts that a ban can be constitutional, recalling the top court's ruling in 2020, which found that "one religion was being discriminated against".
It also ruled that "if the headscarf is a symbol of oppression", a ban puts children in "an uncomfortable situation", but not the people who impose it on them, he told AFP.
In France, authorities banned school children in 2004 from wearing "signs or outfits by which students ostensibly show a religious affiliation" -- such as headscarves, turbans or Jewish skullcaps -- on the basis of the country's secular laws, which are meant to guarantee neutrality in state institutions.
A.Jones--AMWN