-
India in command despite Sooriyabandara half-century
-
German GDP growth revised upwards, defying Iran war turmoil
-
Hyundai reaches tentative deal with workers after strike
-
STARTRADER Adds 30 U.S. Stock and ETF CFDs as 2026 Product Expansion Accelerates
-
Trees 'giving up': climate change hammers historic English gardens
-
Trees 'giving up': climnate change hammers historic English gardens
-
Malian songbird keeps age-old sounds alive at 88
-
Namibia paves way for phosphate mining in the Atlantic Ocean
-
Canada to announce response to Trump's new tariffs
-
Six months into Iran war, Hormuz traffic way down, sailors stranded
-
Stocks stagger and oil rises as traders eye Iran threat, Nvidia results
-
Netanyahu got his Iran war, but maybe not his desired result
-
Families of detained Chinese Christians cling to faith in legal limbo
-
Hyundai reaches tentative deal with workers after strikes
-
Trump veers from boredom to denial after six months of Iran war
-
Once its saviour, US puts Kuwait in Iran's crosshairs
-
Cool Japan: Human fridge chills workers in extreme heat
-
Australia's top music charts ban AI songs
-
Tens of thousands flee fire near US city of Reno
-
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC Announces Transaction in Own Shares - August 25
-
How the French language contributed to the US-Canada trade war
-
Despair and anger erupt after deadly Guinea landfill collapse
-
Nevada sues US govt over cuts to Colorado River access
-
Tornado tears through French village, dozens injured
-
'Special' Chelsea forwards inspire Alonso's winning start
-
Federer looks forward to brief return to Arthur Ashe stadium
-
Alonso makes winning start with Chelsea as Rogers scores on debut
-
US removes Syria from state sponsor of terrorism list
-
Oil prices fall as Bessent outlines new steps to punish Iran
-
Facebook, TikTok promoted Colombian armed groups' content to recruit children: HRW
-
Saudi Arabia to invest $7 bn in theme parks near Paris
-
Palmeiras agree to sell Allan to Manchester City: source
-
British PM Burnham hits a chord on Kyiv visit
-
US vows 'economic asphyxiation' of Iran with new sanctions
-
Saudi Arabia to invest $7 bn in theme parks near Paris: French presidency
-
French tourist dies after getting stuck in scorching Death Valley
-
Vuelta stage three abandoned in dangerous weather conditions
-
US proposes expanding UN Sudan arms embargo to entire country
-
Banned Vondrousova appeals doping suspension to CAS
-
Ceasefire verification mission heads to east DR Congo
-
Ukraine's allies pledge to continue support despite Russian threats
-
Carse dropped from England squad after nightclub incident
-
France readies high school phone ban for next month
-
Empire State Building climbers kiss outside court after viral proposal
-
Trump says to double tariffs on Canada autos as trade fight heats up
-
French poll shows Le Pen's biggest challenger may be hard left's Melenchon
-
Noosha Aubel: Hur mycket administrativt misslyckande tål Potsdam till?
-
Noosha Aubel: Πόση διοικητική αποτυχία μπορεί να αντέξει ακόμα το Πότσδαμ?
-
WeGolden Receives Best Gold Trading Platform Asia 2026 Recognition from TrustFinance Awards
-
WeMasterTrade Receives Best Instant Prop APAC 2026 Recognition from TrustFinance Awards
Austria set to vote on headscarf ban in schools
Austrian lawmakers on Thursday are expected to approve a law banning headscarves in schools for girls under 14, a move rights groups and experts say is discriminatory and could deepen societal division.
Austria's conservative-led government -- under pressure at a time when anti-immigration sentiment is running high -- proposed the ban earlier this year. They argue it is to protect girls "from oppression".
In 2019, when the country introduced a ban on headscarves in primary schools, the constitutional court struck it down, calling it unconstitutional and discriminatory. This time however, the government insists that its law is constitutional.
The law, if passed, would prevent girls younger than 14 from wearing headscarves that "cover the head in accordance with Islamic traditions" in all schools.
"When a girl... is told that she must hide her body... to protect herself from the gaze of men, it's not a religious ritual, but oppression," Integration Minister Claudia Plakolm said when presenting the bill.
The ban, which applies to "all forms" of the Islamic veil including hijabs and burqas, would take full effect with the start of the new school year in September, Plakolm said.
From February, an initial period would be launched during which the new rules would be explained to educators, parents and children with no penalties for breaking them.
But for repeated non-compliance, parents would face fines ranging from 150 to 800 euros ($175-930).
The government said that about 12,000 girls would be affected by the new law, basing its figures on a 2019 study that showed that approximately 3,000 girls aged below 14 wore a headscarf six years ago.
- 'Stigmatised' -
Rights organisations have criticised the bill, including Amnesty International Austria.
Amnesty said it "constitutes blatant discrimination against Muslim girls" and described it as an "expression of anti-Muslim racism".
Such measures risk "fuelling existing prejudices and stereotypes against Muslims", the group warned.
The draft law has also drawn criticism from the IGGOe, the body officially recognised as representing the country's Muslim communities.
It said the ban "jeopardises social cohesion", saying "instead of empowering children, they are stigmatised and marginalised".
Angelika Atzinger, managing director of the Amazone women's rights association, said a headscarf ban "sends girls the message that decisions are being made about their bodies and that this is legitimate".
Her comments appeared in a statement published by the anti-racism group SOS Mitmensch, which also opposes the proposed law.
Austria's anti-immigration, far-right Freedom Party (FPOe), which won last year's general election but failed to form a government, said the ban did not go far enough. They want it extended to all students, teachers and other staff.
The governing coalition said it was confident the revised ban would not be overturned a second time.
It argued that the law provides for such restrictions if the rights of a child, which are enshrined in the constitution, would otherwise be infringed upon.
But constitutional law expert Heinz Mayer has raised doubts that a ban can be constitutional, recalling the top court's ruling in 2020, which found that "one religion was being discriminated against".
It also ruled that "if the headscarf is a symbol of oppression", a ban puts children in "an uncomfortable situation", but not the people who impose it on them, he told AFP.
In France, authorities banned school children in 2004 from wearing "signs or outfits by which students ostensibly show a religious affiliation" -- such as headscarves, turbans or Jewish skullcaps -- on the basis of the country's secular laws, which are meant to guarantee neutrality in state institutions.
A.Jones--AMWN