-
Brutal heat wave forecast for western US this weekend
-
Hundreds of Peruvian newborns named after Norway striker Haaland
-
Music industry launches AI-generated content labels
-
Wall Street gets small boost from SK hynix debut
-
SK hynix surges on first day of trading on Wall Street
-
Deschamps leads France to familiar territory in final World Cup
-
Edwards leaves role with Liverpool owners FSG
-
Alfred goes third in 200m all-time list, Wanyonyi smashes 1km mark
-
Wemby to Spurs fans: 'I'm here to stay, whatever it takes'
-
Trump agrees to more Iran talks but insists truce is over
-
Trump administration weakens habitat protections for endangered species
-
'No secret' that Kane v Haaland the key to England clash, says Norway coach Solbakken
-
Scheffler misses first cut in four years as McIlroy leads at Scottish Open
-
Prince Harry and family meet King Charles: UK media
-
Nearly 50 abducted pupils, teachers rescued in Nigeria
-
Sinner salutes 'true inspiration' Djokovic after ending rival's Wimbledon bid
-
Wanyonyi sets new world best in men's 1,000m
-
US senators announce Trump deal on Russia sanctions bill
-
Djokovic expects to be back at Wimbledon next year
-
Foreigners among 12 killed in ferocious Spain wildfire
-
Sinner, Zverev power into Wimbledon final
-
Vinicius apologizes to Brazilians for World Cup 'frustration'
-
Trump says agreed to more Iran talks but insists truce over
-
Slick Sinner scuppers Djokovic record bid to make Wimbledon final
-
Zverev hungry for Wimbledon glory after Paris breakthrough
-
India's Mandhana stars in inaugural women's Test at Lord's
-
England risk losing Guehi for Norway World Cup quarter-final
-
Xhaka tells Swiss fans to 'keep dreaming' ahead of Argentina World Cup clash
-
UK police launch murder probe into ex-MP's death
-
Drought threatens irrigation in northern Italy
-
Woad is unruffled by the lake as she sails into Evian lead
-
Fery expects to thrive in spotlight after Wimbledon fairytale
-
Brook hoping for double England cricket and football triumph
-
Pressure off for 'scared' Merlier after Tour de France stage win
-
Brazil deforestation hits new low in Amazon
-
Indian cricket board to review T20 team's 'bad phase'
-
England captain George 'buzzing for special talent' Caluori
-
Nasdaq gets no boost from SK hynix debut in NY
-
Trumps says agreed to more Iran talks but insists truce over
-
People 'disdain' AI, says director Christopher Nolan
-
Foreigners among 12 dead in Spanish wildfire, 23 missing
-
Boeing to expand 737 MAX output as aviation giant charts comeback
-
Merlier wins Tour de France seventh stage in sprint finish
-
Berlin mayor abandons re-election bid after power-cut controversy
-
India's Mandhana and Kaur fall in inaugural women's Test at Lord's
-
Polish nationalists protest Jewish pogrom commemoration
-
New Portugal coach Jesus 'will call up' Ronaldo if available
-
Zverev ends wildcard Fery's run to reach first Wimbledon final
-
Commerzbank staff's legal bid against UniCredit rejected
-
China approves fast-fashion giant Shein's Hong Kong listing bid
Austria set to vote on headscarf ban in schools
Austrian lawmakers on Thursday are expected to approve a law banning headscarves in schools for girls under 14, a move rights groups and experts say is discriminatory and could deepen societal division.
Austria's conservative-led government -- under pressure at a time when anti-immigration sentiment is running high -- proposed the ban earlier this year. They argue it is to protect girls "from oppression".
In 2019, when the country introduced a ban on headscarves in primary schools, the constitutional court struck it down, calling it unconstitutional and discriminatory. This time however, the government insists that its law is constitutional.
The law, if passed, would prevent girls younger than 14 from wearing headscarves that "cover the head in accordance with Islamic traditions" in all schools.
"When a girl... is told that she must hide her body... to protect herself from the gaze of men, it's not a religious ritual, but oppression," Integration Minister Claudia Plakolm said when presenting the bill.
The ban, which applies to "all forms" of the Islamic veil including hijabs and burqas, would take full effect with the start of the new school year in September, Plakolm said.
From February, an initial period would be launched during which the new rules would be explained to educators, parents and children with no penalties for breaking them.
But for repeated non-compliance, parents would face fines ranging from 150 to 800 euros ($175-930).
The government said that about 12,000 girls would be affected by the new law, basing its figures on a 2019 study that showed that approximately 3,000 girls aged below 14 wore a headscarf six years ago.
- 'Stigmatised' -
Rights organisations have criticised the bill, including Amnesty International Austria.
Amnesty said it "constitutes blatant discrimination against Muslim girls" and described it as an "expression of anti-Muslim racism".
Such measures risk "fuelling existing prejudices and stereotypes against Muslims", the group warned.
The draft law has also drawn criticism from the IGGOe, the body officially recognised as representing the country's Muslim communities.
It said the ban "jeopardises social cohesion", saying "instead of empowering children, they are stigmatised and marginalised".
Angelika Atzinger, managing director of the Amazone women's rights association, said a headscarf ban "sends girls the message that decisions are being made about their bodies and that this is legitimate".
Her comments appeared in a statement published by the anti-racism group SOS Mitmensch, which also opposes the proposed law.
Austria's anti-immigration, far-right Freedom Party (FPOe), which won last year's general election but failed to form a government, said the ban did not go far enough. They want it extended to all students, teachers and other staff.
The governing coalition said it was confident the revised ban would not be overturned a second time.
It argued that the law provides for such restrictions if the rights of a child, which are enshrined in the constitution, would otherwise be infringed upon.
But constitutional law expert Heinz Mayer has raised doubts that a ban can be constitutional, recalling the top court's ruling in 2020, which found that "one religion was being discriminated against".
It also ruled that "if the headscarf is a symbol of oppression", a ban puts children in "an uncomfortable situation", but not the people who impose it on them, he told AFP.
In France, authorities banned school children in 2004 from wearing "signs or outfits by which students ostensibly show a religious affiliation" -- such as headscarves, turbans or Jewish skullcaps -- on the basis of the country's secular laws, which are meant to guarantee neutrality in state institutions.
A.Jones--AMWN