
-
Online memorial for children dead in Hiroshima, Nagasaki
-
US Senate in final push to pass Trump spending bill
-
Asian stocks rise on trade deal hopes, Tokyo hit by tariff warning
-
Hong Kong rights record under fire as it marks China handover anniversary
-
Bangladeshis cling to protest dreams a year after revolution
-
Djokovic, Sinner enter Wimbledon fray
-
European security tops Denmark's EU presidency priorities
-
France expecting peak temperatures as heatwave hits Europe
-
Germany eye return to women's football summit at Euro 2025
-
'Every day I see land disappear': Suriname's battle to keep sea at bay
-
England feel pressure to perform at Euros as stars pull out
-
Clashes in Istanbul over alleged 'Prophet Mohammed' cartoon
-
India face 'last-minute' Bumrah call as they bid to level England series
-
Dortmund up against 'superstar' Ramos, aggressive Monterrey: Kovac
-
US judge orders Argentina to sell 51% stake in oil firm YPF
-
EPA employees accuse Trump administration of 'ignoring' science
-
US Senate in final slog towards vote on Trump spending bill
-
Over 14 million people could die from US foreign aid cuts: study
-
End of the line for Britain's royal train
-
FIFPro warns of 'wake-up call' over extreme heat at Club World Cup
-
Sean Combs sex trafficking jury ends first day without decision
-
Fluminense stun Inter Milan to reach Club World Cup quarters
-
Thailand's ruling political dynasty faces day of legal peril
-
NASA eyes summer streaming liftoff on Netflix
-
Trump dismantles Syria sanctions program as Israel ties eyed
-
Meta's AI talent war raises questions about strategy
-
Twenty bodies, some headless, found in Mexican cartel bastion
-
Gaza rescuers say Israeli forces kill over 50 as ceasefire calls mount
-
Alcaraz survives scare, Sabalenka cruises on Wimbledon's hottest opening day
-
Only Messi can shirk defending: warns Monterrey coach before Dortmund clash
-
White House says Canada 'caved' to Trump on tech tax
-
Eight-country coalition aims to tax luxury air travel
-
Wimbledon qualifier Tarvet vows to get creative with expenses
-
Iran unleashes 'wave of repression' after Israel war: activists
-
Alcaraz survives Fognini scare to launch Wimbledon title defence
-
Peace deal with Rwanda opens way to 'new era', says DR Congo president
-
Kneecap, Bob Vylan Glastonbury sets spark police probe and global criticism
-
'Starvation' days over as cyclists prepare to gorge on Tour de France
-
Gaza rescuers say Israeli forces kill 48 as ceasefire calls mount
-
Sabalenka boosted by hitting with Djokovic and Sinner at Wimbledon
-
Nigeria theme park offers escape from biting economy
-
Jury considers verdict in Sean Combs sex trafficking trial
-
Wall Street stocks rally further on trade and tax deal optimism
-
Sabalenka cruises on Wimbledon's hottest opening day as Alcaraz launches title bid
-
Bosch breaks through as South Africa set Zimbabwe huge target
-
S.Africa's ex-transport bosses charged over Zuma-era graft case
-
'No panic' says Medvedev after shock Wimbledon exit
-
Rescuers evacuate 50,000 as Turkey battles wildfires
-
ADB acting on US concerns over China, bank chief tells AFP
-
Archer misses out as England unchanged for second India Test

Brazil high court resumes key Indigenous lands case
Brazil's Supreme Court resumed hearings Wednesday in a closely watched case on whether to restrict native peoples' rights to claim their ancestral lands, a key buffer against climate change.
Hundreds of Indigenous protesters, many in traditional feather headdresses, rallied in the capital Brasilia as the court weighed the legality of the so-called "time-frame argument," which holds that native peoples should not have the right to lands where they were not present in 1988, when the current constitution was ratified.
Indigenous groups say that violates their rights, given that many were forced from their ancestral lands, including during the military dictatorship that ruled Brazil from the 1960s to 1980s.
The Supreme Court began hearing the case in 2021, but has adjourned the proceedings several times.
So far, two of the court's 11 justices have sided with the Indigenous plaintiffs, and two against them, one of these a judge who announced his stance on Wednesday.
The proceedings were to resume on Thursday with the remaining seven judges due to state their opinion.
Climate campaigners have joined Indigenous activists in pressing for the court to reject the time-frame argument, given that numerous studies have found that protected Indigenous reservations are one of the best ways to fight deforestation and, with it, global warming.
"The argument ignores our constitutional rights to our ancestral lands, puts existing Indigenous reservations at risk and makes creating new ones unviable," Dinamam Tuxa, coordinator of the Association of Brazil's Indigenous Peoples (APIB), told AFP ahead of the trial.
Indigenous rights groups have dubbed the case the "trial of the century."
The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights said in a statement that a win for the time-frame limitation argument would be "a big setback" for the rights of Indigenous people in Brazil and go against international human rights norms.
The limitation is backed by Brazil's powerful agribusiness lobby, which scored a victory in May when the lower house of Congress passed a bill enshrining the 1988 cutoff in law.
The bill is now working its way through the Senate.
Leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, a self-described ally of Indigenous peoples, is expected to veto the bill if it passes. But Congress, where the agribusiness coalition is a major player, could override a veto.
The case could enter murky legal territory if that happens before the Supreme Court's justices finish delivering their rulings.
The constitution makes no mention of a cutoff date in relation to Indigenous reservations.
Indigenous reservations cover 11.6 percent of Brazil's territory, notably in the Amazon rainforest.
Brazil has around 1.7 million Indigenous inhabitants -- 0.8 percent of the population.
J.Oliveira--AMWN