-
Wimbledon giving Serena 'as much time' as possible for doubles
-
Klopp in 'talks' for Germany job after Nagelsmann exit: federation
-
Chinese investors flock to Hong Kong as trading curbs tighten
-
Surging real estate development divides opinion on Athens' riviera
-
Projected 'super typhoon' heads for US Pacific islands
-
Move over, Messi! Robot footballers thrill crowds in South Korea
-
UN warns of strong looming El Nino
-
France deaths rose by 30% during heatwave
-
Hunt for last signs of life in Venezuela quake zone
-
Drones spot sharks 73 times in two days off Sydney beaches
-
Asian markets rise as beaten-down tech stocks enjoy bounce
-
Supreme leader's body arrives at Tehran religious complex for funeral
-
David v Goliath as Cape Verde face Messi's Argentina at World Cup
-
Mbappe's French juggernaut face Paraguay, eye World Cup quarter-finals
-
Nagelsmann quits as Germany coach after World Cup exit: reports
-
Wallabies riding wave of patriotic support against Ireland
-
All Blacks return to Christchurch 'a blessing', says Savea
-
Belgium opens up Congo archives amid global minerals race
-
'Not a museum': Slovak UNESCO village strains under tourism
-
Wimbledon clings onto fashion traditions, with a twist
-
DR Congo opposition builds against presidential third-term bid
-
Death toll from massive strikes on Kyiv rises to 30
-
China sports brands score NBA stars to assist global ambitions
-
El Nino set to be strong, UN warns
-
Man dies after setting self ablaze outside UN in New York: police
-
'Inspired millions': Modric praised as World Cup career appears at end
-
VAR 'taking joy' from football says Croatia coach Dalic after loss
-
Death toll hits 10 in Thai monk procession crash
-
Afghans come home but risk exclusion without any ID
-
Asian markets rise as beaten tech stocks enjoy respite from selling
-
'Coincidence of life' says Ronaldo after Jota tribute a year from death
-
'Royal wedding': Swift and Kelce kick off star-studded celebrations
-
Japan face Italy without banned coach Jones
-
Tajik names for Tajik babies: strict rules leave parents stranded
-
Ronaldo, Portugal advance after VAR drama to set up Spain showdown
-
From ketchup to car parts, Cuba gets private sector makeover
-
AI romance scam impersonating Dubai prince ensnares victims
-
'Not easy, but not impossible': Iraq's film industry sees slow revival
-
Portugal advance in World Cup thanks to last-gasp Ramos winner
-
Farrell flattery primes Ireland for Australia clash
-
Mission impossible? England take the World Cup high road against Mexico
-
DOJ's Marijuana Rescheduling Court Filing Sends a Dangerous Message
-
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC Announces Transaction in Own Shares - July 03
-
'I was just missing a goal,' says Spain's Yamal
-
Ukraine, Russia vow escalation as strikes on Kyiv kill 27
-
'Royal wedding': Epic Swift-Kelce fairytale marriage begins
-
Messi meeting the "game of our lives", says Cape Verde coach
-
France's Barcola expecting physical Paraguay clash at World Cup
-
Do not open until 2276: US burying time capsule to mark July 4
-
Sciver-Brunt and Knight send England into Women's T20 World Cup final
Brazil high court resumes key Indigenous lands case
Brazil's Supreme Court resumed hearings Wednesday in a closely watched case on whether to restrict native peoples' rights to claim their ancestral lands, a key buffer against climate change.
Hundreds of Indigenous protesters, many in traditional feather headdresses, rallied in the capital Brasilia as the court weighed the legality of the so-called "time-frame argument," which holds that native peoples should not have the right to lands where they were not present in 1988, when the current constitution was ratified.
Indigenous groups say that violates their rights, given that many were forced from their ancestral lands, including during the military dictatorship that ruled Brazil from the 1960s to 1980s.
The Supreme Court began hearing the case in 2021, but has adjourned the proceedings several times.
So far, two of the court's 11 justices have sided with the Indigenous plaintiffs, and two against them, one of these a judge who announced his stance on Wednesday.
The proceedings were to resume on Thursday with the remaining seven judges due to state their opinion.
Climate campaigners have joined Indigenous activists in pressing for the court to reject the time-frame argument, given that numerous studies have found that protected Indigenous reservations are one of the best ways to fight deforestation and, with it, global warming.
"The argument ignores our constitutional rights to our ancestral lands, puts existing Indigenous reservations at risk and makes creating new ones unviable," Dinamam Tuxa, coordinator of the Association of Brazil's Indigenous Peoples (APIB), told AFP ahead of the trial.
Indigenous rights groups have dubbed the case the "trial of the century."
The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights said in a statement that a win for the time-frame limitation argument would be "a big setback" for the rights of Indigenous people in Brazil and go against international human rights norms.
The limitation is backed by Brazil's powerful agribusiness lobby, which scored a victory in May when the lower house of Congress passed a bill enshrining the 1988 cutoff in law.
The bill is now working its way through the Senate.
Leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, a self-described ally of Indigenous peoples, is expected to veto the bill if it passes. But Congress, where the agribusiness coalition is a major player, could override a veto.
The case could enter murky legal territory if that happens before the Supreme Court's justices finish delivering their rulings.
The constitution makes no mention of a cutoff date in relation to Indigenous reservations.
Indigenous reservations cover 11.6 percent of Brazil's territory, notably in the Amazon rainforest.
Brazil has around 1.7 million Indigenous inhabitants -- 0.8 percent of the population.
J.Oliveira--AMWN