-
Parachutes: A vital part of Artemis II's trip home
-
Michael Jackson fans swarm Berlin for biopic premiere
-
Iran sets conditions as Vance warns Tehran not to 'play' US at talks
-
Trump says Iran has 'no cards' beyond Hormuz control
-
Israeli strike in south Lebanon kills 13 security personnel
-
Will The Wise wins Topham as tragedy strikes Gold Dancer
-
Over 100,000 worshippers perform Friday prayers at Al-Aqsa
-
Teen star Seixas claims stage five to close on Basque Tour victory
-
War's impact on fertilisers stirs food producer fears
-
US inflation surges to 3.3% as Iran war impact bites
-
Thais fete new year with family despite fuel price spike
-
Scheffler scrambles, Rose stumbles early at Masters
-
On Iran truce, all sides want bigger China role, but does China?
-
Sinner eases into Monte Carlo semi-final against Zverev
-
Inter skipper Martinez suffers calf injury
-
Ukrainians sceptical as Kremlin orders Easter truce
-
Arteta urges Arsenal to pile pressure on Man City in title race
-
Pay fears grow for US security workers in shutdown
-
Hungary rivals rally crowds in closing strait of election campaign
-
Swede goes on trial for pressuring wife to sell sex
-
US inflation surges 3.3% as Iran war impact bites
-
Vance warns Iran not to 'play' US at talks in Pakistan
-
Fernandez remains out despite apology: Chelsea boss Rosenior
-
Dortmund defender Schlotterbeck extends contract until 2031
-
De Zerbi vows to save troubled Spurs from relegation
-
Antwerp port reopens to North Sea shipping after oil spill
-
Stocks mixed, oil steadies on guarded optimism for Iran ceasefire
-
Sinner eases into Monte Carlo semi-finals
-
France's Macron talks war, peace and basketball with Pope Leo
-
Fernandez apologised over comments about his future: Chelsea's Rosenior
-
Coach Spalletti signs new Juve deal until 2028
-
AI chatbots offer children harm as if it were help, says activist
-
'Grumpy' Guardiola wants Silva to stay at Man City for life
-
Zverev beats Fonseca to reach Monte Carlo semi-finals
-
Scheffler, Rose to chase McIlroy with early Masters starts
-
Celine Dion's Paris concerts promise to spin the money on and on
-
Stocks climb, oil steadies on guarded optimism over Iran war ceasefire
-
Irish govt to meet farmers, hauliers over fuel cost fears
-
Injured Bayern starlet Karl to miss Real return leg
-
US-Iran talks in Pakistan uncertain as sides trade accusations
-
Oil spill snarls shipping traffic in Antwerp port
-
Giving birth in a shelter in Israel
-
Five things to know about the planned Iran-US talks in Islamabad
-
Slot feels 'complete support' from Liverpool chiefs despite slump
-
Kyiv books tentative diplomatic coup with Iran war forays
-
Teenager shines as Britain seize control of BJK Cup tie with Australia
-
Chinese, Taiwanese will unite, Xi tells Taiwan opposition leader
-
Sleepy seal diverts traffic in Australian seaside town
-
Artemis astronauts to shed light on space health risks
-
Pakistan prepares to host US-Iran talks, as Lebanon fighting continues
Brazil high court resumes key Indigenous lands case
Brazil's Supreme Court resumed hearings Wednesday in a closely watched case on whether to restrict native peoples' rights to claim their ancestral lands, a key buffer against climate change.
Hundreds of Indigenous protesters, many in traditional feather headdresses, rallied in the capital Brasilia as the court weighed the legality of the so-called "time-frame argument," which holds that native peoples should not have the right to lands where they were not present in 1988, when the current constitution was ratified.
Indigenous groups say that violates their rights, given that many were forced from their ancestral lands, including during the military dictatorship that ruled Brazil from the 1960s to 1980s.
The Supreme Court began hearing the case in 2021, but has adjourned the proceedings several times.
So far, two of the court's 11 justices have sided with the Indigenous plaintiffs, and two against them, one of these a judge who announced his stance on Wednesday.
The proceedings were to resume on Thursday with the remaining seven judges due to state their opinion.
Climate campaigners have joined Indigenous activists in pressing for the court to reject the time-frame argument, given that numerous studies have found that protected Indigenous reservations are one of the best ways to fight deforestation and, with it, global warming.
"The argument ignores our constitutional rights to our ancestral lands, puts existing Indigenous reservations at risk and makes creating new ones unviable," Dinamam Tuxa, coordinator of the Association of Brazil's Indigenous Peoples (APIB), told AFP ahead of the trial.
Indigenous rights groups have dubbed the case the "trial of the century."
The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights said in a statement that a win for the time-frame limitation argument would be "a big setback" for the rights of Indigenous people in Brazil and go against international human rights norms.
The limitation is backed by Brazil's powerful agribusiness lobby, which scored a victory in May when the lower house of Congress passed a bill enshrining the 1988 cutoff in law.
The bill is now working its way through the Senate.
Leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, a self-described ally of Indigenous peoples, is expected to veto the bill if it passes. But Congress, where the agribusiness coalition is a major player, could override a veto.
The case could enter murky legal territory if that happens before the Supreme Court's justices finish delivering their rulings.
The constitution makes no mention of a cutoff date in relation to Indigenous reservations.
Indigenous reservations cover 11.6 percent of Brazil's territory, notably in the Amazon rainforest.
Brazil has around 1.7 million Indigenous inhabitants -- 0.8 percent of the population.
J.Oliveira--AMWN