-
Oil prices jump back toward $100 on Mideast ceasefire doubts
-
Player tells Tiger to 'get a chauffeur'
-
Believers rejoice as Jerusalem's holy sites re-open
-
EU lawmakers want to tax Big Tech to fund budget
-
Croke Park boss eager to stage Fury-Joshua heavyweight clash in Dublin
-
Cannes Festival promises escapism in Hollywood-lite edition
-
Stabbed for saying no: Is online misogyny fueling violence in Brazil?
-
Russia's Nobel Prize-winning rights group Memorial branded 'extremist'
-
McIlroy ready for early start as 90th Masters begins
-
Fonseca eases into Monte Carlo last eight meeting with Zverev
-
Verstappen set for fresh F1 angst as engineer nears Red Bull exit - reports
-
Farhadi, Almodovar, Zvyagintsev to vie for top Cannes Festival prize
-
Ambitious Como's Champions League bid tested by Serie A leaders Inter
-
Emperor penguins listed as endangered species: IUCN
-
Six new caps for France for women's Six Nations opener
-
Calls for US-Iran truce to extend to Lebanon after Israeli strikes
-
Nepal ex-PM Oli gives defiant message after release from custody
-
Despite Middle East truce, airlines fear long-term disruptions
-
Memorial: Russia's Nobel Prize winning rights group facing 'extremism' ban
-
Artemis crew's families enthralled by messages from space
-
Champions Cup 'heartbreak' driving Toulouse revenge mission
-
Shallow Indonesian quake damages houses, injures residents
-
Nepal ex-PM Oli released from custody after 12 days: police
-
'Chills': Artemis astronauts say lunar flyby still washing over them
-
Ukraine lets firms deploy air defences against Russian attacks
-
Mountain-made: Balkan sheepdog eyes future beyond the hills
-
Escaped wolf forces school closure in South Korea
-
Three ways Orban gives himself an edge in Hungary's vote
-
Trump says US military to stay deployed near Iran until 'real agreement' reached
-
Gender-row boxer Lin targets Asian Games after bronze on comeback
-
US-Iran truce shows cracks as war flares in Lebanon
-
In Romania, many Hungarians root for Orban in vote
-
Home where young Bowie dreamt of 'fame' to open to public
-
Crude rises, stocks fall on fears over nascent Iran ceasefire
-
Waiting for DeepSeek: new model to test China's AI ambitions
-
You're being watched: Japan battles online abuse of athletes
-
US court expedites Anthropic's legal battle with Department of War
-
Badminton to trial synthetic shuttlecocks because of feather shortage
-
Firm, fast Augusta set to test golf's best in 90th Masters
-
BTS to kick off world tour after landmark Seoul comeback
-
Grand National had to change to survive, says former winning jockey
-
Maple syrup or nutella? PM Carney calls Canadian Artemis astronaut
-
Comedy duo Flight of the Conchords reunion gigs sell out in minutes
-
US-Iran truce enters second day as war flares in Lebanon
-
Trump blasts NATO after closed-door Rutte meeting
-
Houston, we have a problem ... with the toilet
-
Stagwell (STGW) Appoints Lena Petersen as Chief Brand and Communications Officer
-
Banff Half Marathon Completes 2025 Emissions Assessment, Supporting Climate Action with Karbon-X
-
Elektros Strengthens Strategic Position Following Validation of Proprietary EV Charging Patent with Global Automotive Leader
-
XCF Global Provides Update on New Rise Reno Plant Conversion
Climate impacts set to cut 2050 global GDP by nearly a fifth
Climate change caused by CO2 emissions already in the atmosphere will shrink global GDP in 2050 by about $38 trillion, or almost a fifth, no matter how aggressively humanity cuts carbon pollution, researchers said Wednesday.
But slashing greenhouse gas emissions as quickly as possible remains crucial to avoid even more devastating economic impacts after mid-century, they reported in the journal Nature.
Economic fallout from climate change, the study shows, could increase tens of trillions of dollars per year by 2100 if the planet were to warm significantly beyond two degrees Celsius above mid-19th century levels.
Earth's average surface temperature has already climbed 1.2C above that benchmark, enough to amplify heatwaves, droughts, flooding and tropical storms made more destructive by rising seas.
Annual investment needed to cap global warming below 2C -- the cornerstone goal of the 2015 Paris Agreement -- is a small fraction of the damages that would be avoided, the researchers found.
Staying under the 2C threshold "could limit average regional income loss to 20 percent compared to 60 percent" in a high-emissions scenario, lead author Max Kotz, an expert in complexity science at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), told AFP.
Economists disagree on how much should be spent to avoid climate damages. Some call for massive investment now, while others argue it would be more cost-effective to wait until societies are richer and technology more advanced.
- Poor countries hit hardest -
The new research sidesteps this debate, but its eye-watering estimate of economic impacts helps make the case for ambitious near-term action, the authors and other experts said.
"Our calculations are super relevant" to such cost-benefit analyses, said co-author Leonie Wenz, also a researcher at PIK.
They could also inform government strategies for adapting to climate impacts, risk assessments for business, and UN-led negotiations over compensation for developing nations that have barely contributed to global warming, she told AFP.
Mostly tropical nations -- many with economies already shrinking due to climate damages -- will be hit hardest, the study found.
"Countries least responsible for climate change are predicted to suffer income loss that is 60 percent greater than the higher-income countries and 40 percent greater than higher-emission countries," said senior PIK scientist Anders Levermann.
"They are also the ones with the least resources to adapt to its impacts."
Rich countries will not be spared either: Germany and the United States are forecast to see income shrivel by 11 percent by 2050, and France by 13 percent.
Projections are based on four decades of economic and climate data from 1,600 regions rather than country-level statistics, making it possible to include damages earlier studies ignored, such as extreme rainfall.
- A likely underestimate -
The researchers also looked at temperature fluctuations within each year rather than just averages, as well as the economic impact of extreme weather events beyond the year in which they occurred.
"By accounting for these additional climate variables, the damages are about 50 percent larger than if we were to only include changes in annual average temperatures," the basis of most prior estimates, said Wenz.
Wenz and her colleagues found that unavoidable damage would slash the global economy's GPD by 17 percent in 2050, compared to a scenario with no additional climate impacts after 2020.
Even so, the new calculations may be conservative.
"They are likely to be an underestimate of the costs of climate change impacts," Bob Ward, policy director of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment in London, commented to AFP ahead of the study's publication.
Damages linked to sea-level rise, stronger tropical cyclones, the destabilisation of ice sheets and the decline of major tropical forests are all excluded, he noted.
Climate economist Gernot Wagner, a professor at Columbia Business School in New York who was also not involved in the study, said the conclusion that "trillions in damages are all locked in doesn't mean that cutting carbon pollution doesn't pay."
In fact, he said, it shows that "the costs of acting are a fraction of the costs of unmitigated climate change".
Global GDP in 2022 was just over $100 trillion, according to the World Bank. The study projects that -- absent climate impacts after 2020 -- it would be double that in 2050.
Ch.Havering--AMWN