-
BMW 7 Series and i7: facelift in 2026
-
Eileen Gu makes history with Olympic freeski halfpipe gold
-
Eileen Gu makes history with Olympic halfpipe gold
-
Morocco flood evacuees mark muted Ramadan away from home
-
Lucid Gravity 2026: Test report
-
Sri Lanka restrict England to 146-9 in T20 World Cup Super Eights
-
West Indies wary of Zimbabwe's 'X-factor' quick Muzarabani
-
Bentley: Visions for 2026
-
Eileen Gu wins Olympic gold in women's freeski halfpipe
-
First 'dispersed' Winter Olympics a success -- and snow helped
-
Six stand-out moments from the 2026 Winter Olympics
-
Andrew's arrest hands King Charles fresh royal crisis
-
Afghans mourn villagers killed in Pakistani strikes
-
Jeeno Thitikul brings home LPGA win in Thailand
-
Snowboard champion Karl '99 percent' sure parallel giant slalom will stay in Olympics
-
Greenland does not need US hospital ship: Danish minister
-
Russian missile barrage hits energy, railways across Ukraine
-
Ka Ying Rising makes Hong Kong racing history with 18th win
-
St Francis relics go on public show for first time in Italy
-
Deflated Australia face tough questions after T20 World Cup flop
-
Brazil's Lula urges Trump to treat all countries equally
-
Knicks rally to down Rockets as Pistons, Spurs roll on
-
Brumbies end 26-year jinx with thrashing of Crusaders
-
Pakistan launches deadly strikes in Afghanistan
-
Son's LAFC defeats Messi and Miami in MLS season opener
-
Korda to face Paul in all-American Delray Beach final
-
Vikings receiver Rondale Moore dies at 25
-
Copper, a coveted metal boosting miners
-
Indigenous protesters occupy Cargill port terminal in Brazil
-
Four lives changed by four years of Russia-Ukraine war
-
AI agent invasion has people trying to pick winners
-
'Hamnet' eyes BAFTAs glory over 'One Battle', 'Sinners'
-
Cron laments errors after Force crash to Blues in Super Rugby
-
The Japanese snowball fight game vying to be an Olympic sport
-
'Solar sheep' help rural Australia go green, one panel at a time
-
Cuban Americans keep sending help to the island, but some cry foul
-
As US pressures Nigeria over Christians, what does Washington want?
-
Dark times under Syria's Assad hit Arab screens for Ramadan
-
Bridgeman powers to six-shot lead over McIlroy at Riviera
-
Artist creates 'Latin American Mona Lisa' with plastic bottle caps
-
Malinin highlights mental health as Shaidorov wears panda suit at Olympic skating gala
-
Timberwolves center Gobert suspended after another flagrant foul
-
Guardiola hails Man City's 'massive' win over Newcastle
-
PSG win to reclaim Ligue 1 lead after Lens lose to Monaco
-
Man City down Newcastle to pile pressure on Arsenal, Chelsea held
-
Man City close gap on Arsenal after O'Reilly sinks Newcastle
-
Finland down Slovakia to claim bronze in men's ice hockey
-
More than 1,500 request amnesty under new Venezuela law
-
US salsa legend Willie Colon dead at 75
-
Canada beat Britain to win fourth Olympic men's curling gold
Climate impacts set to cut 2050 global GDP by nearly a fifth
Climate change caused by CO2 emissions already in the atmosphere will shrink global GDP in 2050 by about $38 trillion, or almost a fifth, no matter how aggressively humanity cuts carbon pollution, researchers said Wednesday.
But slashing greenhouse gas emissions as quickly as possible remains crucial to avoid even more devastating economic impacts after mid-century, they reported in the journal Nature.
Economic fallout from climate change, the study shows, could increase tens of trillions of dollars per year by 2100 if the planet were to warm significantly beyond two degrees Celsius above mid-19th century levels.
Earth's average surface temperature has already climbed 1.2C above that benchmark, enough to amplify heatwaves, droughts, flooding and tropical storms made more destructive by rising seas.
Annual investment needed to cap global warming below 2C -- the cornerstone goal of the 2015 Paris Agreement -- is a small fraction of the damages that would be avoided, the researchers found.
Staying under the 2C threshold "could limit average regional income loss to 20 percent compared to 60 percent" in a high-emissions scenario, lead author Max Kotz, an expert in complexity science at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), told AFP.
Economists disagree on how much should be spent to avoid climate damages. Some call for massive investment now, while others argue it would be more cost-effective to wait until societies are richer and technology more advanced.
- Poor countries hit hardest -
The new research sidesteps this debate, but its eye-watering estimate of economic impacts helps make the case for ambitious near-term action, the authors and other experts said.
"Our calculations are super relevant" to such cost-benefit analyses, said co-author Leonie Wenz, also a researcher at PIK.
They could also inform government strategies for adapting to climate impacts, risk assessments for business, and UN-led negotiations over compensation for developing nations that have barely contributed to global warming, she told AFP.
Mostly tropical nations -- many with economies already shrinking due to climate damages -- will be hit hardest, the study found.
"Countries least responsible for climate change are predicted to suffer income loss that is 60 percent greater than the higher-income countries and 40 percent greater than higher-emission countries," said senior PIK scientist Anders Levermann.
"They are also the ones with the least resources to adapt to its impacts."
Rich countries will not be spared either: Germany and the United States are forecast to see income shrivel by 11 percent by 2050, and France by 13 percent.
Projections are based on four decades of economic and climate data from 1,600 regions rather than country-level statistics, making it possible to include damages earlier studies ignored, such as extreme rainfall.
- A likely underestimate -
The researchers also looked at temperature fluctuations within each year rather than just averages, as well as the economic impact of extreme weather events beyond the year in which they occurred.
"By accounting for these additional climate variables, the damages are about 50 percent larger than if we were to only include changes in annual average temperatures," the basis of most prior estimates, said Wenz.
Wenz and her colleagues found that unavoidable damage would slash the global economy's GPD by 17 percent in 2050, compared to a scenario with no additional climate impacts after 2020.
Even so, the new calculations may be conservative.
"They are likely to be an underestimate of the costs of climate change impacts," Bob Ward, policy director of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment in London, commented to AFP ahead of the study's publication.
Damages linked to sea-level rise, stronger tropical cyclones, the destabilisation of ice sheets and the decline of major tropical forests are all excluded, he noted.
Climate economist Gernot Wagner, a professor at Columbia Business School in New York who was also not involved in the study, said the conclusion that "trillions in damages are all locked in doesn't mean that cutting carbon pollution doesn't pay."
In fact, he said, it shows that "the costs of acting are a fraction of the costs of unmitigated climate change".
Global GDP in 2022 was just over $100 trillion, according to the World Bank. The study projects that -- absent climate impacts after 2020 -- it would be double that in 2050.
Ch.Havering--AMWN