
-
G7 urges Iran de-escalation as Trump makes hasty summit exit
-
Verdict due for Sweden's 'Queen of Trash' over toxic waste
-
Israel, Iran trade missile fire as Trump warns Tehran to 'evacuate'
-
Thunder hold off Pacers to take 3-2 NBA Finals lead
-
Soft power: BTS fans rally behind Korean international adoptees
-
Dominant Flamengo open with victory at Club World Cup
-
Oil prices jump after Trump's warning, stocks extend gains
-
UK MPs eye decriminalising abortion for women in all cases
-
Yen slides ahead of Bank of Japan policy decision
-
Ecuador pipeline burst stops flow of crude
-
China's Xi in Kazakhstan to cement Central Asia ties
-
Despite law, US TikTok ban likely to remain on hold
-
Venezuela's El Dorado, where gold is currency of the poor
-
US forces still in 'defensive posture' in Mideast: White House
-
Trump makes hasty summit exit over Iran crisis
-
OpenAI wins $200 mn contract with US military
-
AFP photographer shot in face with rubber bullet at LA protest
-
Boca denied by two Argentines as Benfica fight back
-
Rise in 'harmful content' since Meta policy rollbacks: survey
-
Trump to leave G7 early after warning of Iran attack
-
'Strange' to play in front of 50,000 empty seats: Chelsea's Maresca
-
Netanyahu says 'changing face of Middle East' as Israel, Iran trade blows
-
Mexican band accused of glorifying cartels changes its tune
-
G7 leaders urge Trump to ease off trade war
-
Trump presses Iran to talk but holds back on joint G7 call
-
Colombia presidential hopeful 'critical' after shooting
-
Main doctor charged in actor Matthew Perry overdose to plead guilty
-
Chelsea defeat LAFC in poorly-attended Club World Cup opener
-
Tiafoe crashes out, Rune cruises through at Queen's Club
-
Netanyahu says campaign 'changing face of Middle East' as Israel, Iran trade blows
-
What's not being discussed at G7 as Trump shapes agenda
-
UK apologises to thousands of grooming victims as it toughens law
-
Iran state TV briefly knocked off air by strike after missiles kill 11 in Israel
-
Trump urges Iran to talk as G7 looks for common ground
-
Canada wildfire near Vancouver contained
-
Four Atletico ultras get suspended jail for Vinicius effigy
-
England's top women's league to expand to 14 teams
-
Oil prices drop, stocks climb as Iran-Israel war fears ease
-
UN refugee agency says will shed 3,500 jobs due to funding cuts
-
US moves to protect all species of pangolin, world's most trafficked mammal
-
Kneecap 'unfazed' by legal problems, says friend and director
-
Electric fences, drones, dogs protect G7 leaders from bear attack
-
The name's Metreweli... Who is UK MI6's first woman chief?
-
Oil prices fall, stocks rise as Iran-Israel war fears ease
-
Fighter jets, refuelling aircraft, frigate: UK assets in Mideast
-
Iranian Nobel laureates, Cannes winner urge halt to Iran-Israel conflict
-
Struggling Gucci owner's shares soar over new CEO reports
-
Khamenei, Iran's political survivor, faces ultimate test
-
Ireland prepares to excavate 'mass grave' at mother and baby home
-
France shuts Israeli weapons booths at Paris Air Show

Climate change cases surge as courts become environment battleground
A quarter of all climate change-related legal cases since the 1980s were filed in the last two years, according to new research Thursday showing surging litigation targeting governments, fossil fuel firms and a growing array of other companies.
The report, which underscores the rising importance of the courts in climate action, comes on the same day that the United States Supreme Court ruled that the government's key environmental agency cannot issue broad limits on greenhouse gases in a blow to climate policy and environment protections.
From legal efforts to steer governments to do more to curb emissions, to court action over companies' misleading green claims, the number, scope and ambitions of climate litigation is expanding, say experts from the Grantham Research Institute at the London School of Economics.
Their report found that of the 2,000 or so legal cases filed since 1986, 475 were started since the beginning of 2020.
"We're likely to see more and more growth," said report co-author Catherine Higham, a Policy Analyst at the Grantham Research Institute.
She added that there is an increasing number of cases where the claimants aim to bring about broad shifts in policies or behaviour.
Most cases are brought against governments, with perhaps the most successful being the landmark 2019 ruling that saw a Dutch Supreme Court ruled that the Netherlands should make more ambitious cuts to its emissions.
Higham said the overwhelming consensus in climate science and broad international agreement on the severe challenges posed by global warming have shifted the legal battleground to focus less on whether governments should act and more on how.
"It's actually very rare at the moment for a government to challenge the underlying climate science," she told AFP.
The report found a growing number of cases targeting the production and consumptions of oil, coal and gas, adding that legal action has played an "important role" in the move toward phasing out fossil fuels.
More and more cases are being filed in the Global South, the report said, with claimants often challenging the development of fossil fuel projects that would "lock in" dependence on carbon pollution.
Legal action against other types of businesses is also on the rise, with more than half of cases involving corporate defendants in 2021 filed against firms in other sectors, like food and agriculture, transport, plastics and finance.
- Chilling effect -
But resorting to the courts can go the other way too, with litigants challenging the introduction of regulations or policies that would lead to greenhouse gas emissions reductions.
There is rising concern that governments could be sued for trillions of dollars by fossil fuel companies seeking compensation for lost revenue and stranded assets.
"There is a potential for these cases to have a significant chilling impact on regulation," said Higham.
Governments could argue that firms have been aware for decades of the need to transition from fossil fuels, she said
It is too soon to say how this would play out before boards of arbitration, she added.
"But it is certainly true that whether it's the Supreme Court of the US, or it's these arbitral tribunals, courts do have huge potential influence over the direction of climate policy, and that that can go either way," she said.
O.Norris--AMWN