-
Thunder crush Lakers as Doncic hurt, Cavs clinch NBA playoff berth
-
Irish income scheme throws artists unique lifeline
-
Microsoft to invest $10 bn for Japan AI data centres
-
Spain rethinks how to turn tide against beach erosion
-
'Breathtaking': Artemis astronauts blast towards Moon
-
Dortmund out to end big-game woes against ascendant Stuttgart
-
Napoli and AC Milan face off as Italy licks its World Cup wounds
-
Barca need Yamal at best without Raphinha for Atletico 'trilogy'
-
Ex-Springbok Smith has Glasgow 'flying' with Scotland job on the horizon
-
UN Security Council delays vote on authorizing force to protect Hormuz
-
Braving high fuel costs, Filipinos flock to crucifixion spectacle
-
Cuba pardons 2,010 prisoners amid US pressure
-
Yamashita in three-way tie for lead at LPGA Aramco Championship
-
Burkina junta chief says country must 'forget' democracy
-
Waste water to clean energy: Japanese engineers harness the power of osmosis
-
Mangione federal trial over CEO murder delayed to January
-
Airbus bets on copter capability for tomorrow's war drones
-
'Metals of the future': copper and silver flow beneath Poland's surface
-
'Something borrowed': Dutch bride opts for recycled wedding
-
Geisha spectacle in Japan's Kyoto celebrates arrival of spring
-
Israeli director Nadav Lapid wants new satire to 'shake souls'
-
UN Security Council to vote on authorizing force to protect Hormuz
-
Man City host Liverpool, Arsenal chase treble in FA Cup quarter-finals
-
Russian court convicts German carnival float artist: reports
-
In ritual dear to Francis, Pope Leo washes feet of 12 priests in Rome
-
With mighty thrust, Artemis astronauts blast towards Moon
-
Colombia's Rodriguez hospitalized with 'severe dehydration'
-
Trump gloats on possible war crimes in Iran, but punishment distant
-
Woods told cops he spoke with 'the President' before arrest: bodycam footage
-
Cunningham to miss another week for NBA Pistons
-
Lyon beat Wolfsburg to reach Women's Champions League semis
-
Oil surges, stocks mixed as Trump dashes hopes of quick end of war
-
Mickelson withdraws from Masters over family matter
-
Blues rugby player retires after terminal cancer diagnosis
-
Trump ballroom approved by panel, remains stalled by judge
-
Resilient Pegula reaches WTA Charleston quarters with tiebreak win
-
Pakistan hikes petrol, diesel prices due to Middle East war
-
Trump orders new pharma tariff, reshapes metal duties
-
Music and barbecues in Tehran despite Trump threats
-
Bielle-Biarrey voted best player of Six Nations for second time
-
Veteran QB Cousins to join Raiders: reports
-
El Ghazi records final legal victory over Israel-Hamas posts
-
Barca crush Real Madrid to reach women's Champions League semis
-
UK police set up national hub to cut illegal knife sales
-
French mayor denounces 'increasingly racist society'
-
Head, Abhishek help Hyderabad thump Kolkata in IPL
-
Trump sacks Bondi, appoints ex-personal attorney to head justice dept
-
PSG return to domestic action with focus on Liverpool
-
Cubans demand end of US embargo in bike protest
-
Body camera video released from Woods arrest
US Supreme Court to weigh Trump bid to end birthright citizenship
The US Supreme Court agreed on Friday to review President Donald Trump's bid to end birthright citizenship.
The conservative-dominated court did not set a date for oral arguments in the blockbuster case but it is likely to be early next year with a ruling in June.
Several lower courts have blocked as unconstitutional Trump's attempt to put restrictions on the law that states that anyone born on US soil is automatically an American citizen.
Trump signed an executive order on his first day in office in January decreeing that children born to parents in the United States illegally or on temporary visas would not automatically become US citizens.
Lower courts have ruled the order to be a violation of the 14th Amendment, which states: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."
Trump's executive order was premised on the idea that anyone in the United States illegally, or on a visa, was not "subject to the jurisdiction" of the country, and therefore excluded from this category.
The Supreme Court rejected such a narrow definition in a landmark 1898 case.
The Trump administration has also argued that the 14th Amendment, passed in the wake of the Civil War, addresses the rights of former slaves and not the children of undocumented migrants or temporary US visitors.
Trump's executive order had been due to come into effect on February 19, but it was halted after judges ruled against the administration in multiple lawsuits.
District Judge John Coughenour, who heard the case in Washington state, described the president's executive order as "blatantly unconstitutional."
"I've been on the bench for over four decades, I can't remember another case where the question presented is as clear as this one is," said Coughenour, who was appointed by a Republican president, Ronald Reagan.
Conservatives hold a 6-3 majority on the Supreme Court and three of the justices were appointed by Trump.
J.Williams--AMWN