-
Belgium boosted by Balogun furore: Tielemans
-
'Disappointed' Pochettino says Balogun row no excuse for US World Cup exit
-
Samsung expects 1,800% operating profit leap on AI boom
-
Seoul dives on mixed day in Asia as Samsung fails to ease tech woes
-
Belgium thrash USA to end World Cup dream and set up Spain showdown
-
Belgium dump US out of World Cup after Balogun row
-
France's Le Pen faces pivotal ruling in race for president
-
How US is using cash and threats to dump migrants in Africa
-
NATO allies seek to win over Trump after Iran ire
-
Democrat in key US Senate race denies sex assault claim
-
US leads international concern after China test-fires missile into Pacific
-
Samsung expects 1,800% leap in quarterly operating profit on AI boom
-
Close to tears and on his own as Ronaldo's World Cup dream ends
-
Russian strikes kill at least 26 in Kyiv region on eve of NATO summit
-
Argentina's gruelling World Cup schedule a concern for Scaloni
-
Ronaldo 'won't make rash decisions' following last World Cup game
-
Race to recover bodies ahead of Venezuela quake cleanup
-
Paraguay govt slams lawmaker for racially abusing France's Mbappe
-
Egypt coach Hassan says Palestinian suffering 'a shame on the world'
-
US embraces Balogun World Cup reprieve as world seethes
-
NBA Kings waive six-time All-Star forward DeRozan
-
Spain win it late to give Ronaldo bitter end to World Cup career
-
Greaves and Hope centuries usher West Indies towards safety
-
Spain edge Portugal to end Ronaldo World Cup dream, US eye quarters
-
'I celebrated in bed' -- Norway's Solbakken stays grounded after beating Brazil
-
Spain win it late to bid farewell to Ronaldo at World Cup
-
Canada chooses Germany's TKMS to build new fleet of submarines
-
Trump's fireworks made Washington world's most polluted city
-
Mbappe condemns racist abuse by Paraguayan senator after World Cup clash
-
Stock markets meander as US tech stocks climb
-
FIFA chief forced to defend Balogun World Cup reprieve
-
Britain's Fery stuns Dimitrov, Paolini into Wimbledon quarters
-
Antetokounmpo says goodbye to Milwaukee in video
-
Russian strikes kill 24 in Kyiv region on eve of NATO summit
-
Fairytale Fery sinks Dimitrov to make Grand Slam history at Wimbledon
-
Trump touts latest White House renovation: a new helipad
-
Canadian Artemis II crew member to retire from space agency
-
Fritz powers past Bublik, into Wimbledon last eight again
-
Prince Harry arrives in UK amid security spat
-
Ovechkin won't say next NHL season will be his last
-
'Agony' in Cuba amid third nationwide blackout in six months
-
Djokovic, Sinner aim to book Wimbledon blockbuster
-
For Trump's World Cup, 'America First' collides with world's game
-
Record fireworks display choked Washington in toxic smoke
-
England's World Cup campaign takes flight with Mexico win
-
Macron in Syria on first post-Assad visit by West European head of state
-
Tour de France stage record still 'far away' for Pogacar
-
US streamers launch new legal fight against French content rules
-
Infantino told Trump FIFA disciplinary body is 'independent'
-
EU tells France to amend social media ban law
US Supreme Court to hear bid to block climate change suits
The US Supreme Court agreed on Monday to hear a case brought by oil and gas companies seeking to block climate change lawsuits.
Dozens of lawsuits have been filed across the United States seeking to hold fossil fuel producers liable for damages caused by climate change.
Exxon Mobil and Suncor Energy (USA) are appealing a Colorado Supreme Court ruling that a climate change lawsuit filed by the city and county of Boulder, Colorado, should be allowed to proceed in state court.
The energy giants argue that such claims should be heard in federal -- not state -- court and that federal environmental laws should apply.
"Boulder, Colorado, cannot make energy policy for the entire country," they said in their petition asking the Supreme Court for review.
"State law cannot impose the costs of global climate change on a subset of the world's energy producers chosen by a single municipality."
Exxon Mobil and Suncor said energy companies are being sued for "billions of dollars in damages for injuries allegedly caused by the contribution of greenhouse-gas emissions to global climate change."
"But as the Court has recognized for over a century," they said, "the structure of our constitutional system does not permit a State to provide relief under state law for injuries allegedly caused by pollution emanating from outside the State."
The Justice Department under President Donald Trump, reversing the stance of the Biden administration, asked the conservative majority Supreme Court to weigh in through a friend-of-the-court brief in the Colorado case.
Reacting to the decision to hear the case, Alyssa Johl, vice president at the Center for Climate Integrity, urged the Supreme Court to uphold the Colorado Supreme Court ruling.
"No part of the Constitution, or any state or federal law, gives corporations the right to lie to the public about the dangers associated with their products simply because those products are fossil fuels," Johl said in a statement.
"The Court should uphold what the Colorado Supreme Court and others have made clear: communities like Boulder have the right to seek accountability in their state courts when corporations have knowingly caused local harms."
Many of the lawsuits filed against oil and gas giants by state and local authorities are modeled on successful legal actions taken against the tobacco industry in the 1990s.
None have yet gone to trial.
The Supreme Court is expected to hear arguments in the case in the fall term, which begins in October.
F.Schneider--AMWN