-
'Two bad options': Rights groups decry IMF austerity demand
-
North Korea says tested AI-assisted torpedo system
-
Guardians-Rays MLB playoff game postponed until Saturday
-
Did Chinese cars squeal on Norway's military?
-
'We've never had this': Bear sightings spook Russia
-
Guardians-Rays MLB playoff game start delayed by rain
-
Injured Jordie Barrett out of second Bledisloe Cup Test
-
Suspected gunman in Oregon school shooting was 'withdrawn,' neighbors say
-
All contenders for UN chief receive veto: diplomat
-
As Champions Cup opens on mournful note, holders Bordeaux-Begles draw
-
UN climate panel fails to agree date for global warming update: envoy
-
Figueroa loses title at weigh-in but Kameda can win it
-
Stocks struggle to bounce back from AI angst-fueled rout
-
Deforestation in Brazil Amazon hits nearly four-decade low
-
Clashes grip Tirana as Albanian PM blames 'foreign hands'
-
US budget deficit grows to nearly $2 trillion, highest since 2021
-
End of a dynasty? Dodgers digest playoff drubbing
-
Bend grieves after mass shooting: 'Who would do this to little kids?'
-
Troyes sack sporting director Blanchard amid sexism claims
-
'Great hero' praised for saving lives in Oregon school shooting
-
Trump's new press secretary out after less than week
-
Trump's new press secretary looks close to exit after just one week
-
EU backs Ukraine on Starlink, but can't fill gap
-
Trump says armed bystander who killed US school shooter a 'great hero'
-
Itauma coming to terms with Hrgovic heavyweight loss
-
Real Madrid say Tebas must resign over Goebbels comparison
-
NBA tells sportsbooks to ban certain bets and parlays: report
-
Djokovic gets Basel wild card as ATP Finals race heats up
-
US influence, AI and mistrust cloud Alberta independence vote
-
Swiss solar-powered plane altitude record confirmed
-
Pant, Bumrah named in India Test squad for New Zealand tour
-
Turkey's Salt Lake, life in the shadow of drought
-
Coen brothers say they plan to make film together again
-
Noosha Aubel: nieudolne zarządzanie zamiast nowego początku — czy nadburmistrzyni Poczdamu potrafi sprostać wymaganiom swojego urzędu?
-
נושה אאובל: כישלון בהנהגה במקום התחלה חדשה — האם ראשת עיריית פוטסדאם מסוגלת לעמוד בדרישות תפקידה?
-
Mexican killers of Australian, US surfers await sentencing
-
From hospital, pope pushes Putin for ceasefire in contested Ukraine city
-
Trump's new press secretary faces intensified scrutiny over claims to be a lawyer
-
King of the Mountains Carapaz joins NSN Cycling team
-
Brazil's left rallies as Lula closes gap before runoff
-
S.African rugby player Hyron Andrews dies in France ahead of Champions Cup game
-
Sean 'Diddy' Combs transfered to smaller US prison
-
Maresca says Man City 'more together' after financial charges
-
Νούσα Άουμπελ: Αποτυχία στην ηγεσία αντί για μια νέα αρχή — ανταποκρίνεται η δήμαρχος του Πότσδαμ στις απαιτήσεις του αξιώματός της;
-
Zelensky drums up European backing as Trump ties slump
-
Arteta praises 'incredible will' of struggling Gyokeres
-
Food crisis 'looming' after global energy shock, UN agriculture fund says
-
S.African rugby player dies in France ahead of Champions Cup game
-
'Sportswashing' or investment? Rwanda F1 stirs debate and doubts
-
Chelsea captain James faces lay-off after knee surgery
US Supreme Court says asylum seekers can be turned away before border
The US Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that migrants seeking to present an asylum claim can be turned away before they reach the US-Mexico border.
The policy, known as "metering," has not been in place since 2021, but President Donald Trump sought a ruling validating it as legal should it be reinstated.
The policy allowed US federal immigration agents on the Mexican side of the US-Mexico border to turn away potential asylum seekers before they reached US soil.
The Immigration and Nationality Act allows an "alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States" to apply for asylum.
A divided appeals court ruled in 2024 that this applies to potential asylum seekers at ports of entry "whichever side of the border they are standing on."
The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to reject this interpretation and the conservative-dominated court did so in a 6-3 ruling.
The question before the Supreme Court was "whether an alien who is stopped on the Mexican side of the US-Mexico border 'arrives in the United States.'"
Justice Samuel Alito, in a majority opinion joined by the five other conservatives, said "an alien standing in Mexico does not 'arrive in the United States' by attempting, and failing, to set foot in this country.
"An alien 'arrives in the United States' only when he crosses the border," Alito said. "A person arrives in a destination when he enters within its area -- not before -- and that conclusion does not change because someone or something blocks entry."
Justice Sonia Sotomayor penned a dissent joined by the other two liberal justices.
"The Court's illogical interpretation is driven almost entirely by a fixation on a single word: 'in,'" Sotomayor wrote, and "blesses the Executive Branch's decision to slam the door shut on all who are fleeing persecution.
"The consequences of today's decision are predictable," she said. "More people will die. More people will attempt to cross the border illegally, and some will make it while others will not."
Trump campaigned for the White House on a promise to expel millions of undocumented migrants and has taken a number of actions since returning to the White House aimed at speeding up deportations and reducing border crossings.
The asylum case is one of a number of immigration-related cases the Supreme Court heard this term.
On Thursday, the top court backed a Trump administration move to strip deportation protections from some 350,000 Haitians and 6,000 Syrians living in the United States.
The Supreme Court is expected to rule next week on President Donald Trump's bid to end birthright citizenship, which makes anyone born on US soil automatically a citizen.
A.Mahlangu--AMWN