
-
US announces Syria-Israel truce as new clashes rock Druze heartland
-
Spain's Bonmati feeling '100 percent' after reaching Euros semis
-
US environment agency axes nearly a quarter of workforce
-
Pacquiao, Barrios make weights for Vegas showdown
-
Spain see off spirited Swiss to reach Euro 2025 semi-finals
-
Lowry accepted 2-shot British Open penalty over fear of 'cheat' backlash
-
Moldova ex-minister charged in Interpol corruption case
-
Canada wildfires burn area the size of Croatia
-
Dubois says victory over Usyk would put him among boxing greats
-
Fitzpatrick happy for 'Tiger-like' Scheffler to assume British Open pressure
-
Venezuela receives 7 kids left behind in US after parents deported
-
Argentines commemorate Jewish center bombing, demand justice
-
Frank aims to take Tottenham to 'new heights'
-
'Mass grave': Medics appeal for aid at last working hospital in Syria's Sweida
-
Over 11 mn refugees risk losing aid because of funding cuts: UN
-
Hojgaard twins hoping for British Open showdown
-
Usyk at career heaviest for title fight with Dubois
-
Charging Scheffler closes on British Open lead
-
Brazil police raid home of Bolsonaro, accused of plotting coup
-
France museum-goer eats million-dollar banana taped to wall
-
Pogacar extends Tour de France lead with dominant time-trial win
-
Tomorrowland music festival opens with new stage after blaze
-
Arsenal seal divisive move for Chelsea winger Madueke
-
G20 nations agree central bank independence 'crucial'
-
Pogacar extends Tour de France lead with uphill time-trial win
-
'Witnesses to despair': Marseille sees poverty fuel cocaine problem
-
Stocks consolidate after bumper week buoyed by resilient US economy
-
MacIntyre 'will not back off' in bid for first major title
-
What's in the EU's two-trillion-euro budget bazooka?
-
EU, UK target Russian oil in tough new Ukraine war sanctions
-
Barca's planned Camp Nou return in August scrapped
-
McIlroy 'excited' for shot at homecoming British Open glory
-
Hunter Harman stalking second British Open crown
-
Marquez tops Czech MotoGP practice as Martin returns
-
Disinformation catalyses anti-migrant unrest in Spain
-
Ex-Brazil president Bolsonaro must wear monitoring device: Supreme Court
-
Resilient US economy spurs on stock markets
-
Trump administration seeks to release some of Epstein probe material
-
Man Utd agree deal to sign Brentford winger Mbeumo: reports
-
New clashes rock Syria's Druze heartland as tribal fighters reinforce Bedouin
-
Germany presses ahead with deportations to Afghanistan
-
Crews rescue 18 miners trapped in Colombia
-
McIlroy five back as Harman leads British Open
-
Lyles the showman ready to deliver 100m entertainment
-
EU targets Russian oil in tough new Ukraine war sanctions
-
Liverpool line up swoop for Frankfurt striker Ekitike: reports
-
Stocks up, dollar down tracking Trump moves and earnings
-
Three Sri Lankan elephants killed in blow to conservation efforts
-
Indie game studios battle for piece of Switch 2 success
-
Former Liverpool and Man Utd star Ince banned for drink-driving

US court limits officials' contacts with social media firms
A US federal court on Tuesday restricted some top officials and agencies of President Joe Biden's administration from meeting and communicating with social media companies to moderate their content, a ruling that could curtail government efforts to fight online falsehoods.
The injunction was in response to a lawsuit brought by the Republican attorneys general of Louisiana and Missouri, who alleged that government officials went too far in their efforts to get platforms to combat vaccine and election misinformation.
The ruling by a federal court in Louisiana marks a win for conservative advocates in the United States who allege that the government has pressured or colluded with social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter to censor right-leaning content under the guise of fighting misinformation.
The order applies to a slew of top law enforcement agencies such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the State Department, Justice Department as well as health agencies including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
It also applies to several prominent officials such as White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre and Alejandro Mayorkas, secretary of the Department of Homeland Security.
The decision restricts agencies and officials from meeting with social media companies or flagging posts for "the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech" under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry hailed the "historic injunction" that he said will prevent the Biden administration from "censoring the core political speech of ordinary Americans" on social media.
In a statement, he accused senior federal officials of seeking to "dictate what Americans can and cannot say on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and other platforms about COVID-19, elections, criticism of the government, and more."
- 'Suppressing speech' -
The order could seriously limit top government agencies from notifying the platforms about false or hateful content that can lead to harmful consequences.
But the ruling said that the government could still inform them about posts involving criminal activity, national security threats and foreign attempts to influence elections.
A White House official said the Justice Department was reviewing the court's injunction and will evaluate its options.
"This administration has promoted responsible actions to protect public health, safety, and security when confronted by challenges like a deadly pandemic and foreign attacks on our elections," the official said.
"Our consistent view remains that social media platforms have a critical responsibility to take account of the effects their platforms are having on the American people, but make independent choices about the information they present."
In addition to communications with social media companies, the ruling also restricted the agencies and officials from "collaborating, coordinating, partnering" with key academic groups including the Election Integrity Partnership, a coalition of research institutions that tackle election-related falsehoods.
Some experts in misinformation and First Amendment law criticized the ruling, saying authorities needed to strike a balance between calling out falsehoods and veering towards censorship or curbing free speech.
"This case raises the difficult but also vitally important question of when the First Amendment restricts the government from trying to persuade, encourage, or 'jawbone' private actors into suppressing speech," said Jameel Jaffer, director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University.
"This said, the court's order in this case is certainly too broad. It would insulate the platforms not just from coercion but from criticism as well."
There was no immediate response from the platforms including the Meta-owned Facebook, Twitter and Google.
O.Norris--AMWN