-
Democrats, Trump hold final rallies before midterm elections
-
African players in Europe: Defender Hakimi's historic hat-trick
-
Japan urges US to enforce discipline after second Marine arrest
-
Struggling Slavia face Arsenal as grim record looms
-
'Remarkable' rookie Lendeborg scores 37 as Warriors beat Clippers
-
Vikings suffer first loss while Broncos edge Chiefs in NFL
-
ExxonMobil urged to re-think Papua New Guinea gas project
-
South Korea to double spending on AI and chips in 2027
-
Asian stocks mixed as tech sector struggles to rebound from selloff
-
On All Saints' Day, Philippine mountain town honours dead with fire
-
India's royals find new power in their past
-
Years on from fall of IS, French jihadists face justice in Iraq
-
Irish bookshops help meet UK demand for Sally Rooney novels
-
Point of Law favourite at Australia's 'race that stops a nation'
-
NFL Vikings suffer first loss while Broncos edge Chiefs
-
'Kid' Antonelli gets affectionate tributes from all quarters
-
Host of fresh faces in Australia white-ball squads to face England
EU Parliament backs green label for gas, nuclear
The European Parliament approved on Wednesday a contentious EU proposal giving a sustainable finance label to investments in gas and nuclear power, sparking claims of "greenwashing" by environmental lobbyists.
MEPs in the eastern French city of Strasbourg declined to reject the measure, which was backed by France and Germany.
There were 278 votes to stop it while 328 voted for a green light. There were 33 abstentions.
Czech Prime Minister Petr Fiala, whose country has just taken over the rotating EU presidency from France, tweeted that the result was "excellent news" for Europe.
"It paves the way towards energy self-sufficiency which is absolutely crucial for our future," he said.
The green label, known in EU parlance as the "taxonomy", for gas and nuclear is the only way that certain EU countries will "be able to meet their climate targets," he had warned before the vote.
A small but influential group of member states and activists had lobbied hard for MEPs to reject the label, in a coalition of opponents to nuclear and gas energy.
Critics of gas point to the war in Ukraine as the most urgent reason to reject the green label, saying that encouraging investment would only increase dependence on Russian supply.
“It’s dirty politics and it’s an outrageous outcome to label gas and nuclear as green and keep more money flowing to Putin’s war chest," Greenpeace EU sustainable finance campaigner Ariadna Rodrigo said.
"We will fight this in the courts," she added.
Eco-campaigner Greta Thunberg tweeted that "the hypocrisy is striking" and argued that the parliament's adoption "will delay a desperately needed real sustainable transition and deepen our dependency on Russian fuels".
Critics of nuclear energy, meanwhile, point to the threat posed by accidents and nuclear waste and believe solar and wind energy is the best way forward.
But the EU executive, under pressure from nuclear-powered France and gas-reliant Germany, argues that both have a role to play as cleaner power sources during the transition to a net-zero carbon future.
The EU hopes that its label will steer huge sums of private capital into activities that support climate goals.
Backers of the taxonomy insist that investment in gas and nuclear is a necessary step on "the route to sustainable energy sources," said German MEP Christian Ehler.
For this reason, the vote is a "wise decision" that will lead to more renewables down the road, he added.
J.Oliveira--AMWN