-
Trapped, starving and afraid in besieged Sudan city
-
Showdown looms as EU-Mercosur deal nears finish line
-
Messi mania peaks in India's pollution-hit capital
-
Wales captains Morgan and Lake sign for Gloucester
-
Serbian minister indicted over Kushner-linked hotel plan
-
Eurovision 2026 will feature 35 countries: organisers
-
Cambodia says Thailand bombs province home to Angkor temples
-
US-Ukrainian talks resume in Berlin with territorial stakes unresolved
-
Small firms join charge to boost Europe's weapon supplies
-
Driver behind Liverpool football parade 'horror' warned of long jail term
-
German shipyard, rescued by the state, gets mega deal
-
Flash flood kills dozens in Morocco town
-
'We are angry': Louvre Museum closed as workers strike
-
Australia to toughen gun laws as it mourns deadly Bondi attack
-
Stocks diverge ahead of central bank calls, US data
-
Wales captain Morgan to join Gloucester
-
UK pop star Cliff Richard reveals prostate cancer treatment
-
Mariah Carey to headline Winter Olympics opening ceremony
-
Indonesia to revoke 22 forestry permits after deadly floods
-
Louvre Museum closed as workers strike
-
Spain fines Airbnb 64 mn euros for posting banned properties
-
Japan's only two pandas to be sent back to China
-
Zelensky, US envoys to push on with Ukraine talks in Berlin
-
Australia to toughen gun laws after deadly Bondi shootings
-
Lyon poised to bounce back after surprise Brisbane omission
-
Australia defends record on antisemitism after Bondi Beach attack
-
US police probe deaths of director Rob Reiner, wife as 'apparent homicide'
-
'Terrified' Sydney man misidentified as Bondi shooter
-
Cambodia says Thai air strikes hit home province of heritage temples
-
EU-Mercosur trade deal faces bumpy ride to finish line
-
Inside the mind of Tolkien illustrator John Howe
-
Mbeumo faces double Cameroon challenge at AFCON
-
Tongue replaces Atkinson in only England change for third Ashes Test
-
England's Brook vows to rein it in after 'shocking' Ashes shots
-
Bondi Beach gunmen had possible Islamic State links, says ABC
-
Lakers fend off Suns fightback, Hawks edge Sixers
-
Louvre trade unions to launch rolling strike
-
Far-right Kast wins Chile election landslide
-
Asian markets drop with Wall St as tech fears revive
-
North Korean leader's sister sports Chinese foldable phone
-
Iran's women bikers take the road despite legal, social obstacles
-
Civilians venture home after militia seizes DR Congo town
-
Countdown to disclosure: Epstein deadline tests US transparency
-
Desperate England looking for Ashes miracle in Adelaide
-
Far-right Kast wins Chile election in landslide
-
What we know about Australia's Bondi Beach attack
-
Witnesses tell of courage, panic in wake of Bondi Beach shootings
-
Chiefs out of playoffs after decade as Mahomes hurts knee
-
Chilean hard right victory stirs memories of dictatorship
-
Volunteers patrol Thai villages as artillery rains at Cambodia border
Boomers: Selfish or Scapegoats?
The debate over whether the Baby Boomer generation—those born between 1946 and 1964—deserves the label of "the most selfish generation in history" has intensified in recent years. Critics argue that Boomers have prioritised their own comfort and prosperity at the expense of future generations, while defenders point to their contributions to social progress and economic growth. This article explores both sides of the argument, drawing on economic, social, and cultural factors to assess the validity of the claim.
A Generation of Prosperity
The post-World War II era was a time of unprecedented economic growth, particularly in Western nations. Boomers grew up in a period of relative stability and prosperity, benefiting from expanding educational opportunities, affordable housing, and a booming job market. This generation was the first to enjoy the fruits of modern consumer culture, with access to new technologies, healthcare advancements, and a welfare state that provided a safety net. However, this prosperity has been criticised as a double-edged sword. While Boomers thrived, they are accused of failing to address long-term challenges such as climate change, economic inequality, and the sustainability of social security systems. The argument goes that their focus on short-term gains has left younger generations—particularly Millennials and Generation Z—facing a future of environmental degradation, housing crises, and precarious employment.
The Burden of Debt
One of the most frequently cited examples of Boomer selfishness is their approach to public debt. Over the past few decades, national debts have soared in many countries, driven by policies that prioritised tax cuts, increased spending on entitlements, and economic stimulus measures. Critics argue that Boomers, who have held political and economic power during this period, have been complicit in passing on this financial burden to future generations. The rising cost of healthcare, pensions, and social security, combined with stagnating wages for younger workers, has fuelled resentment. In some nations, national debt has increased dramatically since the turn of the century, a period during which Boomers dominated leadership positions. This fiscal irresponsibility, some argue, reflects a generational disregard for the future.
The Housing Divide
Housing is another area where Boomers are accused of hoarding wealth. In many developed countries, property prices have skyrocketed, making homeownership increasingly unattainable for younger generations. Boomers, who bought homes when prices were relatively low, have seen their property values soar, creating a wealth gap that is difficult for Millennials and Gen Z to bridge. Over the past few decades, average house prices have risen significantly while wages have remained largely stagnant. This has led to accusations that Boomers have pulled up the ladder behind them, benefiting from policies that favoured property ownership while younger generations are left renting or struggling to save for deposits.
A Legacy of Progress
However, it would be unfair to paint the entire generation with the same brush. Boomers have also been responsible for significant social progress. The civil rights movements of the 1960s and 1970s, which fought for racial equality, gender rights, and LGBTQ+ inclusion, were largely driven by Boomer activists. Their contributions to technology, healthcare, and education have also been transformative. The digital revolution, which laid the foundation for the modern internet and communication technologies, was spearheaded by Boomer innovators. Moreover, many Boomers have engaged in philanthropy and community service, challenging the notion that they are universally selfish.
Generational Perceptions
Another important factor to consider is the role of generational differences in shaping perceptions of selfishness. Younger generations, facing economic uncertainty and environmental crises, may view Boomers' actions through a lens of frustration. However, it is worth noting that every generation has faced criticism from its successors. The Silent Generation, who preceded the Boomers, were often derided for their conformity and conservatism, while Millennials have been labelled as entitled and overly reliant on technology. This cyclical nature of generational criticism suggests that the "selfish" label may be more a reflection of changing societal values than an objective truth.
Structural Influences
Furthermore, the accusation of selfishness overlooks the structural factors that have shaped Boomer behaviour. The economic policies of the late 20th century, particularly the rise of neoliberalism, encouraged individualism and short-term thinking. Boomers, like all generations, were influenced by the prevailing ideologies of their time. The shift towards deregulation, privatisation, and globalisation was not solely a Boomer creation but a broader political and economic trend. To single out Boomers as uniquely selfish ignores the complex interplay of historical forces that have shaped modern society.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while there is evidence to suggest that the Boomer generation has benefited disproportionately from economic and social conditions, labelling them as "the most selfish generation in history" is an oversimplification. Their contributions to social progress and innovation cannot be ignored, nor can the structural factors that have influenced their behaviour. The intergenerational debate is likely to continue, but it is essential to approach it with nuance, recognising that each generation operates within the constraints and opportunities of its time.
Trap laid, Ukraine walked in
BRICS-Dollar challenge
Saudi shift shakes Israel
Al-Qaida’s growing ambitions
Argentina's radical Shift
Hidden Cartel crisis in USA
New York’s lost Luster
Europe’s power shock
Australian economy Crisis
Israel’s Haredi Challenge
Miracle in Germany: VW soars