-
US accuses S. Africa of harassing US officials working with Afrikaners
-
ECB holds rates as Lagarde stresses heightened uncertainty
-
Trump Media announces merger with fusion power company
-
Stocks rise as US inflation cools, tech stocks bounce
-
Zelensky presses EU to tap Russian assets at crunch summit
-
Pope replaces New York's Cardinal Dolan with pro-migrant bishop
-
Odermatt takes foggy downhill for 50th World Cup win
-
France exonerates women convicted over abortions before legalisation
-
UK teachers to tackle misogyny in classroom
-
Historic Afghan cinema torn down for a mall
-
US consumer inflation cools unexpectedly in November
-
Danish 'ghetto' residents upbeat after EU court ruling
-
ECB holds rates but debate swirls over future
-
Pope replaces New York's Cardinal Timothy Dolan with little-known bishop
-
Bank of England cuts interest rate after UK inflation slides
-
Have Iran's authorities given up on the mandatory hijab?
-
Spain to buy 100 military helicopters from Airbus
-
US strike on alleged drug boat in Pacific kills four
-
Thailand strikes building in Cambodia's border casino hub
-
Protests in Bangladesh as India cites security concerns
-
European stocks rise before central bank decisions on rates
-
Tractors clog Brussels in anger at EU-Mercosur trade deal
-
Not enough evidence against Swedish PM murder suspect: prosecutor
-
Nepal's ousted PM Oli re-elected as party leader
-
British energy giant BP extends shakeup with new CEO pick
-
Pulitzer-winning combat reporter Peter Arnett dies at 91
-
EU kicks off crunch summit on Russian asset plan for Ukraine
-
Lyon humbled to surpass childhood hero McGrath's wicket tally
-
Sri Lanka plans $1.6 bn in cyclone recovery spending in 2026
-
England vow to keep 'fighting and scrapping' as Ashes slip away
-
'Never enough': Conway leans on McKenzie wisdom in epic 300 stand
-
Most Asian markets track Wall St lower as AI fears mount
-
Cambodia says Thailand bombs casino hub on border
-
Thai queen wins SEA Games gold in sailing
-
England Ashes dreams on life-support as Australia rip through batting
-
Masterful Conway, Latham in 323 opening stand as West Indies wilt
-
Danish 'ghetto' tenants hope for EU discrimination win
-
Cricket Australia boss slams technology as Snicko confusion continues
-
Conway and Latham's 323-run opening stand batters hapless West Indies
-
Alleged Bondi shooters holed up in hotel for most of Philippines visit
-
Japan govt sued over 'unconstitutional' climate inaction
-
US approves $11 billion in arms sales to Taiwan: Taipei
-
England battle to save Ashes as Australia rip through top-order
-
Guarded and formal: Pope Leo XIV sets different tone
-
What to know about the EU-Mercosur deal
-
Trump vows economic boom, blames Biden in address to nation
-
Conway 120 as New Zealand in command at 216-0 against West Indies
-
Taiwan eyes fresh diplomatic ties with Honduras
-
ECB set to hold rates but debate swirls over future
-
Asian markets track Wall St lower as AI fears mount
Boomers: Selfish or Scapegoats?
The debate over whether the Baby Boomer generation—those born between 1946 and 1964—deserves the label of "the most selfish generation in history" has intensified in recent years. Critics argue that Boomers have prioritised their own comfort and prosperity at the expense of future generations, while defenders point to their contributions to social progress and economic growth. This article explores both sides of the argument, drawing on economic, social, and cultural factors to assess the validity of the claim.
A Generation of Prosperity
The post-World War II era was a time of unprecedented economic growth, particularly in Western nations. Boomers grew up in a period of relative stability and prosperity, benefiting from expanding educational opportunities, affordable housing, and a booming job market. This generation was the first to enjoy the fruits of modern consumer culture, with access to new technologies, healthcare advancements, and a welfare state that provided a safety net. However, this prosperity has been criticised as a double-edged sword. While Boomers thrived, they are accused of failing to address long-term challenges such as climate change, economic inequality, and the sustainability of social security systems. The argument goes that their focus on short-term gains has left younger generations—particularly Millennials and Generation Z—facing a future of environmental degradation, housing crises, and precarious employment.
The Burden of Debt
One of the most frequently cited examples of Boomer selfishness is their approach to public debt. Over the past few decades, national debts have soared in many countries, driven by policies that prioritised tax cuts, increased spending on entitlements, and economic stimulus measures. Critics argue that Boomers, who have held political and economic power during this period, have been complicit in passing on this financial burden to future generations. The rising cost of healthcare, pensions, and social security, combined with stagnating wages for younger workers, has fuelled resentment. In some nations, national debt has increased dramatically since the turn of the century, a period during which Boomers dominated leadership positions. This fiscal irresponsibility, some argue, reflects a generational disregard for the future.
The Housing Divide
Housing is another area where Boomers are accused of hoarding wealth. In many developed countries, property prices have skyrocketed, making homeownership increasingly unattainable for younger generations. Boomers, who bought homes when prices were relatively low, have seen their property values soar, creating a wealth gap that is difficult for Millennials and Gen Z to bridge. Over the past few decades, average house prices have risen significantly while wages have remained largely stagnant. This has led to accusations that Boomers have pulled up the ladder behind them, benefiting from policies that favoured property ownership while younger generations are left renting or struggling to save for deposits.
A Legacy of Progress
However, it would be unfair to paint the entire generation with the same brush. Boomers have also been responsible for significant social progress. The civil rights movements of the 1960s and 1970s, which fought for racial equality, gender rights, and LGBTQ+ inclusion, were largely driven by Boomer activists. Their contributions to technology, healthcare, and education have also been transformative. The digital revolution, which laid the foundation for the modern internet and communication technologies, was spearheaded by Boomer innovators. Moreover, many Boomers have engaged in philanthropy and community service, challenging the notion that they are universally selfish.
Generational Perceptions
Another important factor to consider is the role of generational differences in shaping perceptions of selfishness. Younger generations, facing economic uncertainty and environmental crises, may view Boomers' actions through a lens of frustration. However, it is worth noting that every generation has faced criticism from its successors. The Silent Generation, who preceded the Boomers, were often derided for their conformity and conservatism, while Millennials have been labelled as entitled and overly reliant on technology. This cyclical nature of generational criticism suggests that the "selfish" label may be more a reflection of changing societal values than an objective truth.
Structural Influences
Furthermore, the accusation of selfishness overlooks the structural factors that have shaped Boomer behaviour. The economic policies of the late 20th century, particularly the rise of neoliberalism, encouraged individualism and short-term thinking. Boomers, like all generations, were influenced by the prevailing ideologies of their time. The shift towards deregulation, privatisation, and globalisation was not solely a Boomer creation but a broader political and economic trend. To single out Boomers as uniquely selfish ignores the complex interplay of historical forces that have shaped modern society.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while there is evidence to suggest that the Boomer generation has benefited disproportionately from economic and social conditions, labelling them as "the most selfish generation in history" is an oversimplification. Their contributions to social progress and innovation cannot be ignored, nor can the structural factors that have influenced their behaviour. The intergenerational debate is likely to continue, but it is essential to approach it with nuance, recognising that each generation operates within the constraints and opportunities of its time.
Europe and its "big" goals for clean hydrogen
Putin and the murder of Alexei Navalny (47†)
Measles: UK authorities call for vaccinate children
EU: Von der Leyen withdraws controversial pesticide law
EU: Prison for "paedophilia manuals" and child abuse forgeries
EU: 90% cut of all greenhouse gas emissions by 2040?
How is climate change spreading disease?
Business: Is it important to speak multiple languages?