-
McIlroy got everything but the win out of Northern Ireland homecoming
-
Calm returns to south Syria after violence that killed over 1,100: monitor
-
Mexico's O'Ward wins Toronto Indy to gain in title chase
-
British Open win 'special feeling' for dominant Scheffler
-
Scheffler ticks off British Open in pursuit of perfection
-
Brilliant Scheffler cruises to fourth major title at British Open
-
French petition against return of bee-killing pesticide passes 1mn
-
'Superman' triumphs once again at N.American box office
-
A million people sign French petition against bringing back bee-killing pesticide
-
European powers plan fresh nuclear talks with Iran
-
Pope urges immediate end to 'barbarity' of Gaza war
-
Arrested Kenyan activist faces terror charges
-
Gaza civil defence says Israeli fire kills 73 aid seekers
-
Wellens wins stage as Pogacar maintains Tour de France stranglehold
-
Scheffler 'in a league of his own', says inspired DeChambeau
-
Injured Draper takes time out as he targets US Open
-
Clinical Bangladesh thump sloppy Pakistan in first T20I
-
England's Carter suffers racist abuse at Euro 2025
-
Wellens wins stage as Pogacar keeps Tour de France lead
-
Gaza civil defence says Israeli fire kills 67 aid seekers
-
Martin Solveig bids goodbye to DJing at retirement gig
-
France's Boisson wins maiden WTA title in Hamburg
-
England to host next three World Test Championship finals
-
Shigeru Ishiba, Japan's rapidly diminishing PM
-
Pakistani camel relearns to walk with prosthetic leg
-
Lesotho's jockeys saddle up for mountain horse racing
-
Texas flood missing toll revised sharply down to three
-
South Korea rain death toll hits 17, with 11 missing
-
Dominant Marquez cruises to Czech MotoGP win
-
Bublik wins first clay title in Gstaad
-
Western aid cuts cede ground to China in Southeast Asia: study
-
Fury targets third fight against undisputed heavyweight champion Usyk
-
Coach Erasmus calls time on mass Springbok experiments
-
Solberg secures first WRC win in Estonia
-
Calm returns to south Syria after violence that killed 1,000: monitor
-
Election drubbing projected for Japan PM
-
Hong Kong hit by strong winds, heavy rain as Typhoon Wipha skirts past
-
Shi beats Lanier to win Japan Open badminton title
-
Manila crowd cheers Pacquiao comeback, draw and all
-
South Korea rain death toll rises to 14: government
-
Pacquiao held to draw by Barrios in world title return
-
Tearful relatives await news from Vietnam wreck rescue
-
Anxious relatives await news from Vietnam wreck rescue
-
Syrian govt says fighting in Sweida halted after tribal forces pull out
-
Schmidt says Wallabies must hit the ground running in Melbourne
-
Rodriguez stops Cafu in super flyweight unification fight
-
Hong Kong axes flights, classes as Typhoon Wipha approaches
-
Fundora batters Tszyu to retain WBC superwelter crown
-
Hanoi scooter riders baulk at petrol-powered bikes ban
-
'Tiger like' Scheffler set to spoil McIlroy dream in British Open finale
Boomers: Selfish or Scapegoats?
The debate over whether the Baby Boomer generation—those born between 1946 and 1964—deserves the label of "the most selfish generation in history" has intensified in recent years. Critics argue that Boomers have prioritised their own comfort and prosperity at the expense of future generations, while defenders point to their contributions to social progress and economic growth. This article explores both sides of the argument, drawing on economic, social, and cultural factors to assess the validity of the claim.
A Generation of Prosperity
The post-World War II era was a time of unprecedented economic growth, particularly in Western nations. Boomers grew up in a period of relative stability and prosperity, benefiting from expanding educational opportunities, affordable housing, and a booming job market. This generation was the first to enjoy the fruits of modern consumer culture, with access to new technologies, healthcare advancements, and a welfare state that provided a safety net. However, this prosperity has been criticised as a double-edged sword. While Boomers thrived, they are accused of failing to address long-term challenges such as climate change, economic inequality, and the sustainability of social security systems. The argument goes that their focus on short-term gains has left younger generations—particularly Millennials and Generation Z—facing a future of environmental degradation, housing crises, and precarious employment.
The Burden of Debt
One of the most frequently cited examples of Boomer selfishness is their approach to public debt. Over the past few decades, national debts have soared in many countries, driven by policies that prioritised tax cuts, increased spending on entitlements, and economic stimulus measures. Critics argue that Boomers, who have held political and economic power during this period, have been complicit in passing on this financial burden to future generations. The rising cost of healthcare, pensions, and social security, combined with stagnating wages for younger workers, has fuelled resentment. In some nations, national debt has increased dramatically since the turn of the century, a period during which Boomers dominated leadership positions. This fiscal irresponsibility, some argue, reflects a generational disregard for the future.
The Housing Divide
Housing is another area where Boomers are accused of hoarding wealth. In many developed countries, property prices have skyrocketed, making homeownership increasingly unattainable for younger generations. Boomers, who bought homes when prices were relatively low, have seen their property values soar, creating a wealth gap that is difficult for Millennials and Gen Z to bridge. Over the past few decades, average house prices have risen significantly while wages have remained largely stagnant. This has led to accusations that Boomers have pulled up the ladder behind them, benefiting from policies that favoured property ownership while younger generations are left renting or struggling to save for deposits.
A Legacy of Progress
However, it would be unfair to paint the entire generation with the same brush. Boomers have also been responsible for significant social progress. The civil rights movements of the 1960s and 1970s, which fought for racial equality, gender rights, and LGBTQ+ inclusion, were largely driven by Boomer activists. Their contributions to technology, healthcare, and education have also been transformative. The digital revolution, which laid the foundation for the modern internet and communication technologies, was spearheaded by Boomer innovators. Moreover, many Boomers have engaged in philanthropy and community service, challenging the notion that they are universally selfish.
Generational Perceptions
Another important factor to consider is the role of generational differences in shaping perceptions of selfishness. Younger generations, facing economic uncertainty and environmental crises, may view Boomers' actions through a lens of frustration. However, it is worth noting that every generation has faced criticism from its successors. The Silent Generation, who preceded the Boomers, were often derided for their conformity and conservatism, while Millennials have been labelled as entitled and overly reliant on technology. This cyclical nature of generational criticism suggests that the "selfish" label may be more a reflection of changing societal values than an objective truth.
Structural Influences
Furthermore, the accusation of selfishness overlooks the structural factors that have shaped Boomer behaviour. The economic policies of the late 20th century, particularly the rise of neoliberalism, encouraged individualism and short-term thinking. Boomers, like all generations, were influenced by the prevailing ideologies of their time. The shift towards deregulation, privatisation, and globalisation was not solely a Boomer creation but a broader political and economic trend. To single out Boomers as uniquely selfish ignores the complex interplay of historical forces that have shaped modern society.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while there is evidence to suggest that the Boomer generation has benefited disproportionately from economic and social conditions, labelling them as "the most selfish generation in history" is an oversimplification. Their contributions to social progress and innovation cannot be ignored, nor can the structural factors that have influenced their behaviour. The intergenerational debate is likely to continue, but it is essential to approach it with nuance, recognising that each generation operates within the constraints and opportunities of its time.

Live coverage of HM Queen Elizabeth II's state funeral

LIVE: Farewell to Queen Elizabeth II.

King Charles III promises 'lifelong service' to the Nation

The Queen: From Churchill to Yeltsin and Tito to Trudeau

Queen Elizabeth II dies aged 96

Ukraine: Kherson, nuclear inspectors and Russian army

Why Lithuania didn't join the tributes to Gorbachev

Germany: River Rhine water levels could fall to critical low
