-
Possible contenders in UK Labour Party leadership race
-
Germany's Merz says wouldn't advise young people to move to US
-
Israel strikes Lebanon as talks in US enter second day
-
Kyiv in mourning after 24 killed as Ukraine, Russia swap POWs
-
Beckham becomes first British billionaire sportsman
-
Aussie star, Danish clubbing ode through to Eurovision final
-
German Oscar winner Huller feels war guilt 'every day'
-
Thai lawmakers vote to revive clean air bill
-
Bayern warn that Canada's Davies struggling to be fit for World Cup
-
Long-serving Coleman to end Everton career at end of season
-
Energy-hungry German industries in decline since Ukraine war: data
-
Gordon may have made last Newcastle appearance: Howe
-
Denmark's Queen Margrethe has angioplasty in hospital: palace
-
Civilians caught in war of drones in eastern DR Congo
-
French city reels from teen killing in drug-linked shooting
-
NZ passenger from hantavirus cruise quarantines in Taiwan
-
Sci-fi or battlefield reality? Ukraine's bet on drone swarms
-
Russia, Ukraine swap 205 prisoners of war each
-
Southeast Asia's largest dinosaur identified in Thailand
-
Rapprochement, debates, dissidents: US presidential visits to China
-
Indian magnate Adani agrees multi-million-dollar penalty in US court case
-
Drones to fight school shooters? One US company says yes
-
Mines 'draining Turkey's water sources', environmentalists warn
-
Zimbabwe tobacco hits new highs under smallholder contracts
-
War imperils rare vultures' yearly odyssey to the Balkans
-
Russian border city shrugs off Baltic fears of attack
-
Bitter church row divides Armenia ahead of elections
-
India hikes fuel prices as Middle East war strains supplies
-
Injured Mitoma fails to make Japan's World Cup squad
-
Malaysia PM says not opposed to fugitive financier's bid for pardon
-
Passenger from hantavirus cruise quarantines on remote Pitcairn Island
-
Duplantis kicks off Diamond League season in China
-
Arsenal scent Premier League glory
-
Russia pummels Kyiv, killing at least 24 and denting peace hopes
-
Rare South-North Korea football match sells out in 12 hours
-
Six hantavirus cruise passengers land in Australia
-
Markets wait on Trump-Xi summit, Seoul hits record
-
Solomon Islands elects opposition leader Matthew Wale as PM
-
Football: 2026 World Cup stadium guide
-
Hearts must run Celtic gauntlet to claim historic Scottish title
-
All at stake for Bundesliga relegation battlers on final day
-
Trump traded hundreds of millions in US securities in 2026
-
Can World Cup fuel North America's soccer boom?
-
Bulgaria's pro-Russians seek place after Radev win
-
Canada's Cohere embraces 'low drama' amid AI giant tumult
-
Sci-fi or battlefield reality? Ukraine's bet on swarm drones
-
India seeks trade, energy stability on UAE-Europe tour
-
Five things to look out for in La Liga this weekend
-
Man City battle 'fatigue' ahead of FA Cup final clash with troubled Chelsea
-
Egypt farmers hit by Iran war price surge
Climate impacts set to cut 2050 global GPD by nearly a fifth
Climate change caused by CO2 emissions already in the atmosphere will shrink global GDP in 2050 by about $38 trillion, or almost a fifth, no matter how aggressively humanity cuts carbon pollution, researchers said Wednesday.
But slashing greenhouse gas emissions as quickly as possible remains crucial to avoid even more devastating economic impacts after mid-century, they reported in the journal Nature.
Economic fallout from climate change, the study shows, could increase tens of trillions of dollars per year by 2100 if the planet were to warm significantly beyond two degrees Celsius above mid-19th century levels.
Earth's average surface temperature has already climbed 1.2C above that benchmark, enough to amplify heatwaves, droughts, flooding and tropical storms made more destructive by rising seas.
Annual investment needed to cap global warming below 2C -- the cornerstone goal of the 2015 Paris Agreement -- is a small fraction of the damages that would be avoided, the researchers found.
Staying under the 2C threshold "could limit average regional income loss to 20 percent compared to 60 percent" in a high-emissions scenario, lead author Max Kotz, an expert in complexity science at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), told AFP.
Economists disagree on how much should be spent to avoid climate damages. Some call for massive investment now, while others argue it would be more cost-effective to wait until societies are richer and technology more advanced.
- Poor countries hit hardest -
The new research sidesteps this debate, but its eye-watering estimate of economic impacts helps make the case for ambitious near-term action, the authors and other experts said.
"Our calculations are super relevant" to such cost-benefit analyses, said co-author Leonie Wenz, also a researcher at PIK.
They could also inform government strategies for adapting to climate impacts, risk assessments for business, and UN-led negotiations over compensation for developing nations that have barely contributed to global warming, she told AFP.
Mostly tropical nations -- many with economies already shrinking due to climate damages -- will be hit hardest, the study found.
"Countries least responsible for climate change are predicted to suffer income loss that is 60 percent greater than the higher-income countries and 40 percent greater than higher-emission countries," said senior PIK scientist Anders Levermann.
"They are also the ones with the least resources to adapt to its impacts."
Rich countries will not be spared either: Germany and the United States are forecast to see income shrivel by 11 percent by 2050, and France by 13 percent.
Projections are based on four decades of economic and climate data from 1,600 regions rather than country-level statistics, making it possible to include damages earlier studies ignored, such as extreme rainfall.
- A likely underestimate -
The researchers also looked at temperature fluctuations within each year rather than just averages, as well as the economic impact of extreme weather events beyond the year in which they occurred.
"By accounting for these additional climate variables, the damages are about 50 percent larger than if we were to only include changes in annual average temperatures," the basis of most prior estimates, said Wenz.
Wenz and her colleagues found that unavoidable damage would slash the global economy's GPD by 17 percent in 2050, compared to a scenario with no additional climate impacts after 2020.
Even so, the new calculations may be conservative.
"They are likely to be an underestimate of the costs of climate change impacts," Bob Ward, policy director of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment in London, commented to AFP ahead of the study's publication.
Damages linked to sea-level rise, stronger tropical cyclones, the destabilisation of ice sheets and the decline of major tropical forests are all excluded, he noted.
Climate economist Gernot Wagner, a professor at Columbia Business School in New York who was also not involved in the study, said the conclusion that "trillions in damages are all locked in doesn't mean that cutting carbon pollution doesn't pay."
In fact, he said, it shows that "the costs of acting are a fraction of the costs of unmitigated climate change".
Global GDP in 2022 was just over $100 trillion, according to the World Bank. The study projects that -- absent climate impacts after 2020 -- it would be double that in 2050.
Ch.Havering--AMWN