
-
Liverpool crave easy win in Merseyside derby as Arsenal seek Man City hat-trick
-
Australia skipper Cummins says 'hopeful' he'll take part in Ashes
-
China warns Papua New Guinea over Australian defence deal
-
Australian state bans testing of illicit drugs
-
Philippines 'ghost' flood projects leave residents stranded
-
Asian markets fluctuate as focus turns to Trump-Xi, BoJ
-
North Korea's Kim oversees drone test, orders AI development
-
Kenya eye double gold on penultimate day of world championships
-
Canada, Mexico leaders agree to seek 'fairer' trade deal with US
-
How did an Indian zoo get the world's most endangered great ape?
-
Amid emotional retirement reveal, Kershaw focused on beating Giants
-
Dodgers pitching icon Kershaw to retire after 18th MLB season
-
Netflix seeks 'Money Heist' successor in Spanish hub
-
Taiwan running out of time for satellite communications, space chief tells AFP
-
Gaza, Palestinian future to dominate UN gathering
-
Young plaintiffs stand tall after taking on Trump climate agenda in court
-
Kirk killing sparks fierce US free speech debate
-
Eying bottom line, US media giants bow to Trump
-
Indie studio bets on new game after buying freedom from Sega
-
Marseille hoping to catch PSG at the right time in Ligue 1
-
Japan inflation slows in August, rice price surges ease
-
Court seizes assets of Maradona's lawyer, sisters in fraud case
-
RFK Jr panelists make initial changes to childhood vaccine schedule
-
RFK Jr panelists make first changes to childhood vaccine advice
-
Progress stalled on Canada's pollution reduction goal
-
UN Security Council votes on reimposing Iran nuclear sanctions
-
Depleted France eager to 'throw sand in England's machine' in World Cup semi-final
-
Barcelona beat Newcastle, Man City see off Napoli in Champions League
-
Texans' Ward won't face domestic violence charges
-
Alcaraz headlines Team Europe in Laver Cup title defense
-
Rashford bags first Barca goals to seal win at Newcastle
-
Haaland hits 50 Champions League goals in Man City cruise over 10-man Napoli
-
Dodgers pitching icon Kershaw to retire - club
-
Eagles seek answers against Rams in battle of NFL unbeatens
-
Afghanistan crash out of Asia Cup after six-wicket loss to Sri Lanka
-
EU states agree broad UN emissions target avoiding 'embarrassment'
-
US regulator sues Ticketmaster over 'illegal' ticket schemes
-
US small businesses slam Trump tariffs as legal fight proceeds
-
All smiles as Melania and Kate meet kids in first public event
-
EU states agree 'face-saving' broad UN emissions-cutting target
-
Madonna to release new album next year
-
Colombian court issues first sentences for ex-soldiers over civilian killings
-
Chip-maker Nvidia takes stake in rival Intel
-
Putin has let me down, says Trump at end of UK state visit
-
Melania's hat, Epstein's ghost: takeaways from Trump's UK visit
-
UN Security Council to vote on Iran nuclear sanctions Friday
-
AI-backed robot painting aims to boost artist income
-
Israel bombards Gaza City, army says four soldiers killed
-
Former Barca presidents deny corruption at ref scandal court appearance
-
Canada, Mexico leaders meet amid US tariff war

Climate impacts set to cut 2050 global GPD by nearly a fifth
Climate change caused by CO2 emissions already in the atmosphere will shrink global GDP in 2050 by about $38 trillion, or almost a fifth, no matter how aggressively humanity cuts carbon pollution, researchers said Wednesday.
But slashing greenhouse gas emissions as quickly as possible remains crucial to avoid even more devastating economic impacts after mid-century, they reported in the journal Nature.
Economic fallout from climate change, the study shows, could increase tens of trillions of dollars per year by 2100 if the planet were to warm significantly beyond two degrees Celsius above mid-19th century levels.
Earth's average surface temperature has already climbed 1.2C above that benchmark, enough to amplify heatwaves, droughts, flooding and tropical storms made more destructive by rising seas.
Annual investment needed to cap global warming below 2C -- the cornerstone goal of the 2015 Paris Agreement -- is a small fraction of the damages that would be avoided, the researchers found.
Staying under the 2C threshold "could limit average regional income loss to 20 percent compared to 60 percent" in a high-emissions scenario, lead author Max Kotz, an expert in complexity science at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), told AFP.
Economists disagree on how much should be spent to avoid climate damages. Some call for massive investment now, while others argue it would be more cost-effective to wait until societies are richer and technology more advanced.
- Poor countries hit hardest -
The new research sidesteps this debate, but its eye-watering estimate of economic impacts helps make the case for ambitious near-term action, the authors and other experts said.
"Our calculations are super relevant" to such cost-benefit analyses, said co-author Leonie Wenz, also a researcher at PIK.
They could also inform government strategies for adapting to climate impacts, risk assessments for business, and UN-led negotiations over compensation for developing nations that have barely contributed to global warming, she told AFP.
Mostly tropical nations -- many with economies already shrinking due to climate damages -- will be hit hardest, the study found.
"Countries least responsible for climate change are predicted to suffer income loss that is 60 percent greater than the higher-income countries and 40 percent greater than higher-emission countries," said senior PIK scientist Anders Levermann.
"They are also the ones with the least resources to adapt to its impacts."
Rich countries will not be spared either: Germany and the United States are forecast to see income shrivel by 11 percent by 2050, and France by 13 percent.
Projections are based on four decades of economic and climate data from 1,600 regions rather than country-level statistics, making it possible to include damages earlier studies ignored, such as extreme rainfall.
- A likely underestimate -
The researchers also looked at temperature fluctuations within each year rather than just averages, as well as the economic impact of extreme weather events beyond the year in which they occurred.
"By accounting for these additional climate variables, the damages are about 50 percent larger than if we were to only include changes in annual average temperatures," the basis of most prior estimates, said Wenz.
Wenz and her colleagues found that unavoidable damage would slash the global economy's GPD by 17 percent in 2050, compared to a scenario with no additional climate impacts after 2020.
Even so, the new calculations may be conservative.
"They are likely to be an underestimate of the costs of climate change impacts," Bob Ward, policy director of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment in London, commented to AFP ahead of the study's publication.
Damages linked to sea-level rise, stronger tropical cyclones, the destabilisation of ice sheets and the decline of major tropical forests are all excluded, he noted.
Climate economist Gernot Wagner, a professor at Columbia Business School in New York who was also not involved in the study, said the conclusion that "trillions in damages are all locked in doesn't mean that cutting carbon pollution doesn't pay."
In fact, he said, it shows that "the costs of acting are a fraction of the costs of unmitigated climate change".
Global GDP in 2022 was just over $100 trillion, according to the World Bank. The study projects that -- absent climate impacts after 2020 -- it would be double that in 2050.
Ch.Havering--AMWN