-
Why the far right is losing ground in Sweden
-
IOC visits Lyon amid leadership turmoil for 2030 Winter Olympics
-
Ex-Ireland fly-half O'Gara extends deal as La Rochelle coach
-
New York seizes 12 celeb deep-fake porn sites
-
Russian attacks on Ukraine railways escalating every week: rail CEO to AFP
-
Jesse Eisenberg channels emotional intensity into 'The Debut'
-
France, Iraq deepen energy, defence ties during Zaidi visit
-
Alarm over AI grows as divided US Congress struggles to act
-
Trump says Ukraine, Russia agree not to hit energy targets
-
PopDEX Surpasses $61M TVL and $2B Trading Volume in Closed Beta
-
Nigeria's Dangote refinery launches continent's biggest IPO
-
Oasis announce new 2027 world tour
-
Trump blasts 'sick conspiracy' against AI as warnings mount
-
Women athletes condemn 'sexualised' Sydney Sweeney commercial
-
For Laura Linney, role in Parkinson's-themed movie marked a turning point
-
UN calls for 'urgent action' to rein in AI in face of 'unprecedented risks'
-
Doctors face life sentence over Greek pop star's death
-
Russia intensifies attacks seeking to intimidate Ukraine, Europe
-
Trump moves to axe power plant climate rules
-
Richarlison not in Spurs League Cup squad: De Zerbi
-
Slow the AI race? Investors weigh the potential cost
-
French defence group Thales calls on governments to regulate AI
-
Philippine Muslim enclave votes for parliament after deadly shooting
-
Three talking points from the Spanish Grand Prix
-
Germany seeks guarantees from Italy's UniCredit over Commerzbank takeover
-
Saudi football body vows action against Jota chants, Ronaldo urges life ban
-
Liverpool will have to accept 'ups and downs', says Iraola
-
North Korea win 10-0 in Asian Games football mismatch
-
Inaugural Ultimate a hit with the athletes, says Coe
-
Nigerian oil refinery Dangote launches IPO
-
Oil gains on Mideast supply fears, AI warnings rattle tech firms
-
Houthis target Saudi base as Iran denies involvement in Yemen war
-
Mourinho praises 'incredible' Guler amid battle for minutes
-
Sweden faces political uncertainty after election thriller
-
Ozempic-maker Novo Nordisk slims down to 'Novo'
-
How a Chapman Student Revived the Forgotten History of San Francisco's Lavender Panthers
-
STARCARES-Renovated Court In Thailand Grows Into a Shared Space for School and Community
-
Philippine Muslim enclave heads to polls after deadly shooting
-
Oil prices extend gains on Mideast supply fears, tech leads losses
-
New coach won't use AI in bid to make South Korea fans happy
-
Beds too short in 'worst-ever' Asian Games rooms, say South Korea
-
J-VISIONS Vol. 4 Now Online: Read English Articles on Japanese Corporate IR
-
Synapse Analytics Secures US$13m Led by Partech to Drive AI-Powered Decisioning for Financial Institutions
-
In DR Congo streets, ex-hoods get tough on litter -- and locals
-
Bougainville leader says violence won't stop Panguna mine reopening
-
Noosha Aubel káže o odpovědnosti, rozbité silnice v Postupimi však odhalují slabiny jejího vedení
-
Noosha Aubel predikar ansvar – Potsdams usla vägar blottar brister i hennes ledarskap
-
Noosha Aubel poucza o odpowiedzialności, a fatalny stan dróg Poczdamu obnaża słabość jej rządów
-
Noosha Aubel sorumluluk dersi veriyor, Potsdam’ın bozuk yolları yönetim zaafını ele veriyor
-
नूशा आउबेल देती हैं जिम्मेदारी का पाठ, पॉट्सडैम की बदहाल सड़कें खोलती हैं नेतृत्व की पोल
US Supreme Court strikes down constitutional right to abortion
The US Supreme Court on Friday ended the right to abortion in a seismic ruling that shreds half a century of constitutional protections on one of the most divisive and bitterly fought issues in American political life.
The conservative-dominated court overturned the landmark 1973 "Roe v Wade" decision that enshrined a woman's right to an abortion, saying that individual states can now permit or restrict the procedure themselves.
"The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe and Casey are overruled; and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives," the court said.
In the majority opinion, Justice Samuel Alito said "abortion presents a profound moral issue on which Americans hold sharply conflicting views.
"The Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating or prohibiting abortion," he said.
Dissenting were the three liberals on the court.
The ruling will likely set into motion a cavalcade of new laws in roughly half of the 50 US states that will severely restrict or outright ban and criminalize abortions, forcing women to travel long distances to states that still permit the procedure.
The opinion shredded the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling by the nation's highest court that said women had the right to abortion based on the constitutional right to privacy over their own bodies.
Alito's opinion largely mirrors his draft opinion that was the subject of an extraordinary leak in early May, sparking demonstrations around the country and tightened security at the court in downtown Washington.
Barricades have been erected around the court to keep back the protesters gathered outside -- after an armed man was arrested on June 8 near the home of conservative justice Brett Kavanaugh.
The court's ruling goes against an international trend of easing abortion laws, including in such countries as Ireland, Argentina, Mexico and Colombia where the Catholic Church continues to wield considerable influence.
- Victory for religious right -
It represents a victory of 50 years of struggle against abortion by the religious right but the anti-abortion camp is expected to continue to push for an outright nationwide ban.
The ruling was made possible by the nomination of three conservative justices to the court by former Republican president Donald Trump -- Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett.
The case before the court was a Mississippi law that would restrict abortion to 15 weeks but during the hearing of the case in December several justices indicated they were prepared to go further.
According to the Guttmacher Institute, 13 states have adopted so-called "trigger laws" that will ban abortion following the move by the Supreme Court.
Ten others have pre-1973 laws that could go into force or legislation that would ban abortion after six weeks, before many women even know they are pregnant.
Women living in states with strict anti-abortion laws will either have to continue with their pregnancy, undergo a clandestine abortion or obtain abortion pills, or travel to another state where the procedure remains legal.
Several Democratic-ruled states, anticipating an influx, have taken steps to facilitate abortion and clinics have also shifted their resources.
Travel is expensive, however, and abortion rights groups say abortion restrictions will severely impact poor women, many of whom are Black or Hispanic.
S.F.Warren--AMWN