
-
Liverpool to kick off Premier League title defence against Bournemouth
-
Meta offered $100 mn bonuses to poach OpenAI employees: CEO Altman
-
Spain pushes back against mooted 5% NATO spending goal
-
UK inflation dips less than expected in May
-
Oil edges down, stocks mixed but Mideast war fears elevated
-
Energy transition: how coal mines could go solar
-
Australian mushroom murder suspect not on trial for lying: defence
-
New Zealand approves medicinal use of 'magic mushrooms'
-
Suspects in Bali murder all Australian, face death penalty: police
-
Taiwan's entrepreneurs in China feel heat from cross-Strait tensions
-
N. Korea to send army builders, deminers to Russia's Kursk
-
Sergio Ramos gives Inter a scare in Club World Cup stalemate
-
Kneecap rapper in court on terror charge over Hezbollah flag
-
Panthers rout Oilers to capture second NHL Stanley Cup in a row
-
Nearly two centuries on, quiet settles on Afghanistan's British Cemetery
-
Iran says hypersonic missiles fired at Israel as Trump demands 'unconditional surrender'
-
Oil stabilises after surge, stocks drop as Mideast crisis fuels jitters
-
Paul Marshall: Britain's anti-woke media baron
-
Inzaghi defends manner of exit from Inter to Saudi club
-
Made in Vietnam: Hanoi cracks down on fake goods as US tariffs loom
-
Longer exposure, more pollen: climate change worsens allergies
-
Sundowns edge Ulsan in front of empty stands at Club World Cup
-
China downplayed nuclear-capable missile test: classified NZ govt papers
-
Canada needs 'bold ambition' to poach top US researchers
-
US Fed set to hold rates steady as it guards against inflation
-
Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial offers fodder for influencers and YouTubers
-
New rules may not change dirty and deadly ship recycling business
-
US judge orders Trump admin to resume issuing passports for trans Americans
-
Bali flights cancelled after Indonesia volcano eruption
-
India, Canada return ambassadors as Carney, Modi look past spat
-
'What are these wars for?': Arab town in Israel shattered by Iran strike
-
Curfew lifted in LA as Trump battles for control of California troops
-
Chapo's ex-lawyer elected Mexican judge
-
Karbon-X Grows Global Reach with EU Allowances Trading Rollout
-
Guardiola says axed Grealish needs to get 'butterflies back in his stomach'
-
Mbappe a doubt for Real's Club World Cup opener
-
Argentine ex-president Kirchner begins six-year term under house arrest
-
G7 minus Trump rallies behind Ukraine as US blocks statement
-
River Plate ease past Urawa to start Club World Cup tilt
-
Levy wants Spurs to be Premier League winners
-
Monahan to step down as PGA Tour commissioner
-
EU chief says pressure off for lower Russia oil price cap
-
France to hold next G7 summit in Evian spa town
-
Alcaraz wins testing Queen's opener, Fritz, Shelton out
-
Argentine ex-president Kirchner to serve prison term at home
-
Iran confronts Trump with toughest choice yet
-
UK MPs vote to decriminalise abortion for women in all cases
-
R. Kelly lawyers allege he was target of 'overdose' plot by prison guards
-
Tom Cruise to receive honorary Oscar in career first
-
Brazil sells rights to oil blocks near Amazon river mouth

'Fake' Rubens masterpiece debate reignited by new book
Gaudy colours, messy brushwork, even a set of missing toes. The debate about the authenticity of a Rubens's masterpiece "Samson and Delilah" will be reignited next week with the release of a book alleging the painting hanging in London's National Gallery is really a copy.
The work by the 17th century Flemish master Peter Paul Rubens was purchased by the gallery in 1980 for £2.5 million ($3.1 million), then the second-highest price ever paid for a painting at auction.
Every year tens of thousands of visitors view the work, lauded by the world-famous gallery for the artist's use of "highly contrasting light and shade and deep rich colour work".
It's not a view shared, however, by Greek painter and art historian Euphrosyne Doxiadis whose book "NG6461: The Fake Rubens" comes out next week.
Although the National Gallery remains convinced of the painting's authenticity, Doxiadis is adamant that it cannot have been painted by Rubens.
"Rubens was meant to have painted a Samson and Delilah... (but) this painting in the National Gallery is certainly not it," she told AFP by telephone from Greece.
Based on the Old Testament story of the Israelite hero Samson, the painting depicts the moment an accomplice of his treacherous lover Delilah cuts off his hair, the source of his warrior power.
Rubens completed the canvas around 1609, but it mysteriously went missing for nearly three centuries before resurfacing in Paris in 1929.
After changing hands, it was eventually resold to the National Gallery
Doxiadis, 78, said she "instantly" spotted problems with the painting on seeing it four decades ago.
- 'Detective' hunt -
"In 1985, I was wandering around alone and I saw it and I thought it was just a bad copy that they'd borrowed," she said.
Doxiadis, who studied at London's Slade School of Fine Art, said the painting's "cartoon" colours were the biggest red flag.
"Above all it was the lack of colour harmony, it was just gaudy... (and) the drawing, the composition were totally out of sync," she said.
"Also I didn't notice at the time but the foot of Samson is out of the picture -- the toes are missing," she said, adding: "It's a joke!"
Her theory is consistent with previously expressed doubts.
Contemporaneous reproductions show three soldiers in the doorway rather than the five in the National Gallery work.
It was several years after she first laid eyes on "Samson and Delilah" that Doxiadis learned that far from being an acknowledged copy, the painting had been acquired by the London institution for a vast sum.
That discovery so shocked her that she launched a 40-year "detective" hunt.
"When I started this whole research I never thought I'd be lucky enough to find out who painted this copy but I did," she said.
Her findings point to the work of three separate hands at the San Fernando Fine Art Royal Academy in Madrid.
- 'Dictatorship of experts' -
"It had become one of the rules of the academy that the students would do copies from old masters. It began in the early 19th century and went on until around 1910," she said.
Doxiadis said it was not intended to be a fake but after it was sold in Paris in good faith, the new owner succeeded in having it "authenticated" by an expert, sealing its status as an original "masterpiece".
Publishers were reluctant to take Doxiadis's book on although the independent London-based Eris press, distributed by Columbia University Press, eventually came to her rescue.
"There's a dictatorship of experts ... Everyone was closing doors because they didn't want to get involved with something so controversial."
The publicly owned National Gallery has not reacted to the book although it told AFP in a statement the work had "long been accepted by leading Rubens scholars as a masterpiece by Peter Paul Rubens".
"A technical examination of the picture was presented in an article in the National Gallery's Technical Bulletin in 1983. The findings remain valid," it added.
Doxiadis said she remained motivated by a sense of outrage on behalf of the artist and concern that the price tag had been funded by taxpayers' money.
"NG6461: The Fake Rubens", whose title refers to the painting's inventory number, will be published on Wednesday.
T.Ward--AMWN