-
'Only job I wanted', says new France coach Zidane
-
Mercedes CEO urges German 'productivity offensive' as China woes hit profit
-
Japan PM says injuries, buildings collapsed in major quake
-
Praise the Gods! Greek PM thanks Nolan for the 'The Odyssey' spotlight
-
Zinedine Zidane - The good, the bad and the ugly
-
Zidane's long road leads back to France helm
-
France turn to Zidane as coach in long-awaited homecoming
-
Firefighters on offensive in France, Spain as new heatwave arrives
-
Ukraine's Zelensky in US to secure fresh Trump support
-
Seoul, Tokyo lead fresh tech rout as most of Asia retreats
-
Netanyahu to meet Trump for first time since Iran war
-
US tariffs refund boosts Philips
-
BitMart تحت الضغط: لم يتم الإفراج عن 22,000 USDT و930,000 SNC بعد مرور 48 ساعة – هل تعاني BitMart من نقص في الأموال؟
-
Taiwan detains Nvidia worker in chip smuggling probe: source familiar with case
-
BitMart under pressure: 22,000 USDT and 930,000 SNC still not released after 48 hours – is BitMart running out of funds?
-
Why are tech stocks tanking?
-
BitMart 面臨壓力:22,000 USDT 和 930,000 SNC 在 48 小時後仍未解凍——難道 BitMart 資金不足?
-
BitMart под давлением: 22 000 USDT и 930 000 SNC не разблокированы по истечении 48 часов — у BitMart не хватает средств?
-
Myanmar approves death sentence for cyberscam offences
-
Made by AI? EU tells firms to stick a label on it from Sunday
-
Spurs' Maddison says De Zerbi is the right coach for his game
-
Open champion Fox welcomed home by thousands after 'whirlwind few days'
-
Fritz takes 250th hardcourt win in Washington, Draper pulls out
-
Seoul, Tokyo lead Asian plunge as tech stocks suffer fresh rout
-
'Appy marriages: AI helps hundreds of Japanese wed
-
More than skin deep: Dutch abuse victims erase forced tattoos
-
Netanyahu heads to US for first Trump meeting since Iran war
-
AI cameras spot suicide attempts in South Korea's capital
-
Documentary on Stan Lee's final years faced industry opposition, filmmaker says
-
Ukraine's Zelensky expected at White House to secure Trump's support
-
Proformex Debuts Willow, Closing the Information Gap in Life Insurance and Annuities
-
Advanced Bionics Announces FDA Approval of Expanded Cochlear Implant Inclusion Criteria for Patients with Single-Sided Deafness and Asymmetric Hearing Loss
-
Black Book: Healthcare Supply Chain IT Enters a 2027 Replacement Supercycle as 71% Plan Major Upgrades
-
XCF Global Highlights Revenue-Generating Production and Commercial Progress
-
Who Does the Best Facial Rejuvenation in Florida?
-
Pivotree to Release Second Quarter 2026 Financial Results
-
Eagle Plains and American Eagle Gold Corp Execute Option Agreement for the Hearne Hill South, Jinx and NAK NW Copper-Gold Projects, British Columbia
-
Banyan Gold Intersects High-Grade Mineralization at Newly Identified Roaring Fork Zone, Visible Gold at Seattle Creek Zone, Nitra Project, Yukon
-
Who Does the Best Botox in Kirkland and Bellevue, Washington?
-
Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc: Notice of Q2 2026 Results and Investor Presentation
-
Gaming Realms PLC Announces H1 2026 Pre-Close Trading Update
-
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC Announces Transaction in Own Shares - July 28
-
Fritz takes 250th hardcourt win in ATP Washington opener
-
West Indies lead Pakistan by 155 at close of third day
-
US singer D4vd to stand trial in killing of teenage girl
-
Ramsay-Peaty beaten again as Australia reign supreme in Commonwealth pool
-
Sudan RSF leader 'unleashes' fighters after army gains in Kordofan
-
IMF boss hails 'much sounder' Argentine economy under Milei
-
Ramsay-Peaty to learn lessons for LA after missing out on Commonwealth gold
-
HIV progress in 'real danger' as global funding plummets
US tariff dispute: No winner
The trade conflict between the US and China, which began in 2018, has had a lasting impact on the global economy. Under the leadership of President Donald Trump and President Xi Jinping, a bitter tariff dispute developed, characterised by reciprocal punitive tariffs and countermeasures. In April 2025, both countries agreed to a temporary reduction in tariffs: the US reduced its tariffs on Chinese goods from 145% to 30%, while China reduced tariffs on US products from 125% to 10%. This 90-day agreement is seen as a step towards de-escalation, but a final resolution of the conflict remains elusive.
Origin and development
It all began in March 2018, when the US imposed tariffs on Chinese imports worth 50 billion dollars in order to reduce the trade deficit and protect domestic industries. China responded promptly with its own tariffs on US goods, triggering a spiral of escalation. Over the years, tariffs were imposed on goods worth hundreds of billions of dollars, ranging from technology products to agricultural goods and consumer goods. This conflict quickly became a central element of the geopolitical rivalry between the two superpowers.
The Phase One Agreement
A milestone was the ‘Phase One’ agreement in January 2020. China committed to purchasing an additional $200 billion worth of US goods over two years, including agricultural products and industrial goods. Improvements in intellectual property protection and a waiver of forced technology transfers were also agreed. However, implementation lagged behind: China did not fully meet its purchase commitments, which kept tensions high and prompted the US to consider new measures.
Current situation
The April 2025 agreement marks another attempt to defuse the conflict. Nevertheless, the situation remains fragile. China has intensified its trade relations with countries in Southeast Asia in order to reduce its dependence on the US market. At the same time, the US is threatening new tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, which could reignite the dispute. These developments make it clear that the tariff dispute goes far beyond pure trade policy and is deeply embedded in strategic considerations.
Economic impact
The economic consequences are being felt by both sides. In the US, higher import prices have weighed on consumers, while companies are struggling with higher costs and disrupted supply chains. China has seen its economic growth slow, but has shown resilience thanks to diversified trading partnerships. The conflict has not only damaged bilateral relations, but also reshaped the global economy as both countries seek to minimise their mutual dependence.
Conclusion: A stalemate with no winners
The tariff dispute between Trump and Xi Jinping has not produced a clear winner. Although the US was able to force some concessions, China has strengthened its strategic position through diversification and technological independence. Both countries are paying a high economic price, and the latest tariff reduction is merely a temporary truce. The conflict remains an open chapter in the rivalry between the US and China, with neither side gaining the upper hand.
India defies U.S. tariffs
Argentina reshapes oil
Cuba: The Regime's last Card
Brazil's trade-war boom
Israel presses Tehran
Boomers: Selfish or Scapegoats?
Trump’s Crackdown: Lives/Risk
Euro Challenges Dollar's Reign
Zelensky's trap for Putin
Jewish Success: Myths & Facts
China vs. Putin and Kim?