-
Apple expects $900 mn tariff hit as shifts US iPhone supply to India
-
US to end shipping loophole for Chinese goods Friday
-
Forest's Champions League dreams hit by Brentford defeat
-
Norris and Piastri taking championship battle in their stride
-
Chelsea close in on UEFA Conference League final with win at Djurgarden
-
Spurs take control in Europa semi against Bodo/Glimt
-
Man Utd seize control of Europa League semi against 10-man Bilbao
-
With minerals deal, Ukraine finds way to secure Trump support
-
Amazon revenue climbs 9%, but outlook sends shares lower
-
Trump axes NSA Waltz after chat group scandal
-
Forest Champions League dreams hit after Brentford defeat
-
'Resilient' Warriors aim to close out Rockets in bruising NBA playoff series
-
US expects Iran talks but Trump presses sanctions
-
Baffert returns to Kentucky Derby, Journalism clear favorite
-
Top Trump security official replaced after chat group scandal
-
Masked protesters attack Socialists at France May Day rally
-
Mumbai eliminate Rajasthan from IPL playoff race with bruising win
-
McDonald's profits hit by weakness in US market
-
Rio goes Gaga for US singer ahead of free concert
-
New research reveals where N. American bird populations are crashing
-
Verstappen late to Miami GP as awaits birth of child
-
Zelensky says minerals deal with US 'truly equal'
-
Weinstein lawyer says accuser sought payday from complaint
-
Police arrest more than 400 in Istanbul May Day showdown
-
Herbert named head coach of Canada men's basketball team
-
'Boss Baby' Suryavanshi falls to second-ball duck in IPL
-
Shibutani siblings return to ice dance after seven years
-
300,000 rally across France for May 1, union says
-
US-Ukraine minerals deal: what we know
-
Top Trump official ousted after chat group scandal: reports
-
Schueller hat-trick sends Bayern women to first double
-
Baudin in yellow on Tour de Romandie as Fortunato takes 2nd stage
-
UK records hottest ever May Day
-
GM cuts 2025 outlook, projects up to $5 bn hit from tariffs
-
Thousands of UK children write to WWII veterans ahead of VE Day
-
Top Trump official exiting after chat group scandal: reports
-
Madrid Open holder Swiatek thrashed by Gauff in semis
-
Sheinbaum says agreed with Trump to 'improve' US-Mexico trade balance
-
US veteran convicted of quadruple murder to be executed in Florida
-
UK counter terrorism police probe Irish rappers Kneecap
-
S. Korea crisis deepens with election frontrunner retrial, resignations
-
Trump administration releases report critical of youth gender care
-
IKEA opens new London city centre store
-
Police deploy in force for May Day in Istanbul, arrest hundreds
-
Syria Druze leader condemns 'genocidal campaign' against community
-
Prince Harry to hear outcome of UK security appeal on Friday
-
Microsoft raises Xbox prices globally, following Sony
-
US stocks rise on Meta, Microsoft ahead of key labor data
-
Toulouse injuries mount as Ramos doubtful for Champions Cup semi
-
Guardiola glad of Rodri return but uncertain if he'll play in FA Cup final
Nuclear weapons for Poland against Russia?
As Donald Trump’s second term as U.S. President intensifies global tensions, a volatile mix of international defiance and regional military posturing is emerging, with Poland at the centre of a brewing storm. Amidst protests against Trump’s policies, speculation about nuclear escalation and Poland’s strategic moves against Russia have raised alarms, encapsulated in the provocative phrase circulating among activists and commentators: "We are ready for war." Yet, the reality behind these developments remains grounded in diplomatic friction and military preparedness rather than imminent conflict.
Trump’s inauguration on 20 January 2025 marked a return to his "America First" stance, including a pledge to reassess U.S. commitments to NATO, announced in a speech in Texas on 25 January. This has sparked outrage across Europe, with protests erupting in cities like Paris and Berlin. On 28 January, French activist Élise Moreau told a crowd of 12,000 outside the U.S. Embassy in Paris—according to police estimates—that "we are ready for war" against Trump’s "disruptive unilateralism." Similar sentiments have echoed in Warsaw, where Polish citizens and officials fear that a weakened NATO could embolden Russia’s ambitions in Eastern Europe.
Poland’s response has been swift and assertive. On 5 March, the Polish Ministry of Defence confirmed the deployment of an additional 10,000 troops to its eastern border with Belarus and Ukraine, citing "heightened Russian military activity" in the region. This followed reports from the Ukrainian General Staff on 2 March that Russia had amassed 50,000 troops near its western frontier, though Moscow denied any aggressive intent. Poland’s Foreign Minister, Anna Kowalska, stated on 7 March that "Warsaw will not wait for threats to materialise," framing the troop surge as a defensive "gambit" to deter Russian advances.
The spectre of nuclear weapons has further inflamed rhetoric. On 10 March, a senior Polish MP from the ruling Law and Justice Party, Janusz Kowalski, suggested in a televised debate that Poland might seek NATO nuclear sharing agreements "if the U.S. wavers." This echoed Trump’s own comments on 8 March in Florida, where he hinted at reconsidering America’s nuclear umbrella over Europe, stating, "Allies need to pay their share, or they’re on their own." No evidence suggests nuclear weapons are currently "on the way" to Poland, but the remarks have fuelled speculation and alarm, amplified by posts on X claiming "nukes" are imminent.
Across the Atlantic, Trump has dismissed the backlash. At a rally in Michigan on 15 March, attended by an estimated 18,000 supporters according to local authorities, he called European critics "freeloaders" and reiterated his intent to renegotiate defence pacts. The White House followed this with a statement on 16 March, asserting that "no changes to NATO’s nuclear posture are under consideration," attempting to quell fears of escalation.
In Europe, reactions vary. Germany’s Foreign Ministry expressed "deep concern" on 12 March about Poland’s troop movements, urging restraint to avoid provoking Moscow. Meanwhile, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte announced on 17 March that the alliance would hold emergency talks in Brussels next week to address "cohesion and deterrence" amid Trump’s pressures. Analysts note that Poland’s actions align with its long-standing policy of bolstering its military—its defence budget reached 4% of GDP in 2024, per World Bank data—reflecting fears rooted in Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
The "ready for war" rhetoric, while widespread, remains symbolic. Dr. Katarzyna Zielinska, a security expert at Jagiellonian University in Krakow, told this publication, "Poland’s gambit is about deterrence, not aggression. Talk of war—or nukes—is an expression of anxiety, not a plan." Still, the situation is precarious. The International Institute for Strategic Studies reported on 14 March that Russian air patrols near Polish airspace increased by 20% in February 2025 compared to the previous year, heightening regional tensions.
For now, the international rebellion against Trump and Poland’s military stance are distinct but intertwined threads in a broader tapestry of uncertainty. Protests continue—organisers in London are planning a rally for 25 March—while Poland’s border fortifications proceed. Whether these developments signal a genuine slide towards conflict or a recalibration of global alliances remains unclear. What is certain is that Trump’s shadow, and Russia’s looming presence, have set the stage for a critical test of resolve in the months ahead.

NASA and Lockheed partner present X-59 Quesst

China: Gigantic LED in a shopping centre

Did you know everything about panda bears?

Ukraine has a future as a glorious heroic state!

To learn: Chinese school bought an Airbus A320

Countries across Europe are tightening security measures

Five elections in 2024 that will shape Europe!

Norway: Russians sceptical about Russia's terror against Ukraine

Nepal: Crowd demands reinstatement of the monarchy

Europe: Is Bulgaria "hostage" to a Schengen debate?

EU: Netherlands causes headaches in Brussels
