-
'No' camp seen winning Iceland's EU referendum
-
Vietnamese coffee farmers ride China's durian wave
-
Nepal flood survivors return to ruins to salvage memories
-
Venezuela says retains 'sovereignty' in US oil deal
-
Killing of Palestinian children and teens by Israel surges in West Bank
-
NASA's Roman telescope set to launch on cosmic mapping mission
-
Educators keep 9/11 memory alive for next generation, 25 years on
-
Data center backlash scrambles US midterm politics
-
Venezuelans view US oil deal with doubt, hope
-
Emotional Federer inducted into tennis Hall of Fame
-
Gobena and Jepchirchir power to Sydney Marathon victories
-
Hovland takes solo lead as McIlroy surges at Tour Championship
-
Iceland in suspense after close EU vote
-
Djokovic 'prepared' for US Open bid for history
-
Wallabies hold on for victory in Argentina
-
Atletico down Sevilla to go top of La Liga
-
Juve notch second straight win, Fiorentina's centenary party falls flat
-
US deports right-wing provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos
-
Rybakina eases injury fears ahead of US Open
-
Niger junta says it is back in control after soldiers' mutiny
-
Djokovic kicks off latest Grand Slam quest under US Open lights
-
Erasmus calls Rennie barbs over Springbok scrumming 'nonsense'
-
'Sorry' De Zerbi won't panic after Spurs shambles
-
Lawrence's fifty leaves Pakistan facing record chase to level England series
-
UN, Nepal warn of climate threat after deadly floods
-
Netanyahu condemns settler attack in flashpoint West Bank village
-
USTA boss says structure of new player council not yet set
-
Munoz saves Iraola in Liverpool draw, big-spending Spurs lose again
-
Tiny Elversberg stun Leverkusen on Bundesliga debut, Dortmund beat Hamburg
-
Newcastle condemn dismal Spurs to second successive defeat
-
James Cleverly leaves shadow cabinet to seek London mayoralty
-
Police appeal for footage after life-threatening Stratford assault
-
Baladi Map app turns Lebanon’s local problems into a public record
-
Family searches for Boston engineer missing after Nepal-Tibet floods
-
Thirty-seven Mumbai pilgrims return after Nepal flood disruption
-
Dolly Parton’s Imagination Library leaves global children’s reading legacy
-
Ankle ligament tear ends Neeraj Chopra’s 2026 season
-
BMC rejects negligence claims in three Rajawadi Hospital maternity cases
-
Chinchpoklicha Chintamani begins 2026 arrival procession in Parel
-
Chembur man held over alleged poisoning of woman’s soft drink
-
Cyberabad civic body demolishes 19 unauthorised structures
-
Andhra Pradesh Speaker seeks stronger sports quota and school facilities
-
About 50 Karnataka travellers return from Nepal as 24 remain missing
-
Kolkata police register new FIR against Mamata Banerjee over rally timing
-
French campaign sharpens as far right accuses left over civil disobedience calls
-
India and China have not named two new border meeting sites
-
Court orders JIPMER assessment of Durai Dayanidhi before money-laundering trial
-
Tamil Nadu and NUS agree to expand postgraduate and research links
-
Chennai councillors unite across parties to demand ward development funds
-
Tamil Nadu goalball team’s national silver highlights need for wider support
Australia falls short in Great Barrier Reef efforts: experts
Despite warnings, Australia's efforts to save the Great Barrier Reef still fall short of protecting the world's largest coral reef system from pollution and climate change, experts said Monday.
Australia had taken unprecedented steps towards the protection of the Great Barrier Reef, which the United Nations has designated a world heritage site, but more was needed to avoid the site being declared "in danger" by UNESCO, the UN agency which compiles and manages a list of heritage sites.
Such a designation puts a government on notice that a site could be removed from the World Heritage list altogether, a very rare event.
"Despite the unparalleled science and management efforts" made by Australia over recent years, the Great Barrier Reef is "significantly impacted by climate change factors", Eleanor Carter at the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and UNESCO representative Hans Thulstrup said in a report based on a mission to the Reef.
"The resilience of the property to recover from climate change impacts is substantially compromised," they said.
Carter and Thulstrup recommended that the reef should be added to the "World Heritage in Danger" list.
The Australian government in January announced a billion-dollar package to protect the reef, seven years after its "Reef 2050" plan, already a response to a UN downgrade threat.
The Climate Council pressure group said this latest package of funding was like putting "a Band-Aid on a broken leg".
Monday's report echoed that assessment, saying the reef's ability to recover from climate change impacts was "substantially compromised".
In particular, Australian strategies were "lacking clear climate change targets", while some measures were not fully implemented, especially concerning "water quality and fisheries activities", it said.
Australia reported in May that 91 percent of the reef's coral had been damaged by bleaching after a prolonged summer heatwave, a process that increases the mortality rates of the affected corals.
After intense lobbying, Australia narrowly avoided the Reef being placed on UNESCO's "in danger" list in the summer of 2021.
The then-government of conservative prime minister Scott Morrison was voted out this year in favour of a centre-left government under Anthony Albanese who has promised greener policies.
A UNESCO spokesperson told AFP that "a constructive dialogue is ongoing with the current government".
A source close to the matter called Monday's report "a roadmap submitted to the Australian government which should say what it intends to do with it and produce results".
The source added: "The path to saving the Great Barrier Reef is narrow, but it exists. Strong and rapid action can produce results.".
To be included on UNESCO's world heritage list, a site must have "outstanding universal value".
An spot on the list usually means boosted tourism, and improved access to funds and to scientific expertise.
Those benefits are threatened when a site is declared "in danger" -- which is currently the case of about 50 sites worldwide.
Only three sites have ever been dropped from the heritage list completely.
X.Karnes--AMWN