-
Juve notch second straight win, Fiorentina's centenary party falls flat
-
US deports right-wing provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos
-
Rybakina eases injury fears ahead of US Open
-
Niger junta says it is back in control after soldiers' mutiny
-
Djokovic kicks off latest Grand Slam quest under US Open lights
-
Erasmus calls Rennie barbs over Springbok scrumming 'nonsense'
-
'Sorry' De Zerbi won't panic after Spurs shambles
-
Lawrence's fifty leaves Pakistan facing record chase to level England series
-
UN, Nepal warn of climate threat after deadly floods
-
Netanyahu condemns settler attack in flashpoint West Bank village
-
USTA boss says structure of new player council not yet set
-
Munoz saves Iraola in Liverpool draw, big-spending Spurs lose again
-
Tiny Elversberg stun Leverkusen on Bundesliga debut, Dortmund beat Hamburg
-
Newcastle condemn dismal Spurs to second successive defeat
-
James Cleverly leaves shadow cabinet to seek London mayoralty
-
Police appeal for footage after life-threatening Stratford assault
-
Baladi Map app turns Lebanon’s local problems into a public record
-
Family searches for Boston engineer missing after Nepal-Tibet floods
-
Thirty-seven Mumbai pilgrims return after Nepal flood disruption
-
Dolly Parton’s Imagination Library leaves global children’s reading legacy
-
Ankle ligament tear ends Neeraj Chopra’s 2026 season
-
BMC rejects negligence claims in three Rajawadi Hospital maternity cases
-
Chinchpoklicha Chintamani begins 2026 arrival procession in Parel
-
Chembur man held over alleged poisoning of woman’s soft drink
-
Cyberabad civic body demolishes 19 unauthorised structures
-
Andhra Pradesh Speaker seeks stronger sports quota and school facilities
-
About 50 Karnataka travellers return from Nepal as 24 remain missing
-
Kolkata police register new FIR against Mamata Banerjee over rally timing
-
French campaign sharpens as far right accuses left over civil disobedience calls
-
India and China have not named two new border meeting sites
-
Court orders JIPMER assessment of Durai Dayanidhi before money-laundering trial
-
Tamil Nadu and NUS agree to expand postgraduate and research links
-
Chennai councillors unite across parties to demand ward development funds
-
Tamil Nadu goalball team’s national silver highlights need for wider support
-
Tambaram civic groups seek action on eight long-pending issues
-
Rural Tamil Nadu students present 64 technology projects at IIT-M research park
-
Three Texas Tech softball players hurt in jet ski collision
-
Matt Leinart assesses Arch Manning and the leading names in college football
-
Felony assaults on older New Yorkers rise sharply, police data show
-
Los Angeles triplets weigh 19.3 pounds in unusually heavy birth
-
New finds strengthen case for Bethsaida at Sea of Galilee site
-
Editorial questions Letitia James’ record as New York attorney general
-
Five college football games that could shape the 2026 season
-
In London, son's agonising wait for news of parents missing in Nepal-Tibet floods
-
Norway's King Haakon VIII pays tribute to late father in first speech
-
Ivory Coast captain Kessie snubs Juventus to rejoin Atalanta
-
South Africa survive onslaught to beat New Zealand and level series
-
Strasbourg fight back to beat Lens in Ligue 1
-
BJP Rejects Caste Allegation Over Haldwani Venue Ritual
-
Maharashtra Accepts Tribal Students’ Demands After 17-Day Protest
Why go back to the Moon?
On September 12, 1962, then US president John F Kennedy informed the public of his plan to put a man on the Moon by the end of the decade.
It was the height of the Cold War and America needed a big victory to demonstrate its space superiority after the Soviet Union had launched the first satellite and put the first man in orbit.
"We choose to go to the Moon," Kennedy told 40,000 people at Rice University, "because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win."
Sixty years on, the United States is about to launch the first mission of its return program to the Moon, Artemis. But why repeat what has already been done?
Criticism has risen in recent years, for example from Apollo 11 astronaut Michael Collins, and the Mars Society founder Robert Zubrin, who have long advocated for America to go directly to Mars.
But NASA argues re-conquering the Moon is a must before a trip to the Red Planet. Here's why.
- Long space missions -
NASA wants to develop a sustainable human presence on the Moon, with missions lasting several weeks –- compared to just a few days for Apollo.
The goal: to better understand how to prepare for a multi-year round trip to Mars.
In deep space, radiation is much more intense and poses a real threat to health.
Low Earth Orbit, where the International Space Station (ISS) operates, is partly shielded from radiation by the Earth's magnetic field, which isn't the case on the Moon.
From the first Artemis mission, many experiments are planned to study the impact of this radiation on living organisms, and to assess the effectiveness of an anti-radiation vest.
What's more, while the ISS can often be resupplied, trips to the Moon -- a thousand times further -- are much more complex.
To avoid having to take everything with them, and to save costs, NASA wants to learn how to use the resources present on the surface.
In particular, water in the form of ice, which has been confirmed to exist on the lunar south pole, could be transformed into rocket fuel by cracking it into its separate hydrogen and oxygen atoms.
- Testing new gear -
NASA also wants to pilot on the Moon the technologies that will continue to evolve on Mars. First, new spacesuits for spacewalks.
Their design was entrusted to the company Axiom Space for the first mission which will land on the Moon, in 2025 at the earliest.
Other needs: vehicles -- both pressurized and unpressurized -- so that the astronauts can move around, as well as habitats.
Finally, for sustainable access to an energy source, NASA is working on the development of portable nuclear fission systems.
Solving any problems that arise will be much easier on the Moon, only a few days away, than on Mars, which can only be reached in at least several months.
- Establishing a waypoint -
A major pillar of the Artemis program is the construction of a space station in orbit around the Moon, called Gateway, which will serve as a relay before the trip to Mars.
All the necessary equipment can be sent there in "multiple launches," before finally being joined by the crew to set off on the long voyage, Sean Fuller, responsible for the Gateway program, told AFP.
"Kind of like you're stopping at your gas station to make sure you get all the stuff, and then you're off on your way."
- Maintaining leadership over China -
Apart from Mars, another reason put forward by the Americans for settling on the Moon is to do so before the Chinese, who plan to send taikonauts by the year 2030.
China is the United States' main competition today as the once proud Russian space program has withered.
"We don't want China suddenly getting there and saying, "This is our exclusive territory,'" NASA boss Bill Nelson said in a recent interview.
- For the sake of science -
While the Apollo missions brought back to Earth nearly 400 kilograms of lunar rock, new samples will make it possible to further deepen our knowledge of this celestial object and its formation.
"The samples that we collected during the Apollo missions changed the way we view our solar system," astronaut Jessica Meir told AFP. "I think we can expect that from the Artemis program as well."
She expects further scientific and technological breakthroughs too, just like during the Apollo era.
L.Miller--AMWN