-
New Zealand government in talks to save rugby's Moana Pasifika
-
China issues new rules to bust 'ghost' takeout deliveries
-
Kohli dubbed 'heartbeat' of IPL champions in coach Flower tribute
-
Australia economy minister says 'legitimate' fears driving rise of far-right
-
Australia scrum-half Gordon out of Tests after Achilles surgery
-
US, Iran exchange fire as negotiations stall
-
Sooryavanshi sweeps IPL awards -- but is too young to drive prize
-
In Finland, radioactive spent nuclear fuel soon to be buried underground
-
UN to meet on Lebanon after Israel takes Beaufort castle
-
Nvidia launches Windows laptop chip in consumer PC push
-
Popovic tells youthful Australia to be 'fearless' at World Cup
-
Asian equities ahead, oil rises as uncertainty surrounds US-Iran talks
-
Sabalenka, Osaka clash in blockbuster French Open tie
-
'AI simply can't replicate it': Japan embraces zine trend
-
In Colorado, Trump cuts to climate research take toll
-
Hollywood honors Marilyn Monroe, 100 years after her birth
-
Outgoing chair Powell delivers defense of Fed independence
-
Trump fan, leftist through to Colombia presidential runoff
-
GERSTEL Strengthens Global Scientific Engagement with Bioz to Unlock Publication-Driven Insights Across Its Product Portfolio
-
Nano One Announces Retirement of Founder and CEO Dan Blondal, President & Chief Strategy Officer Alex Holmes Appointed to CEO Role
-
Grande Portage Resources Advances Ongoing Project Studies and Fieldwork to Support New Amalga Gold Project Development
-
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC Announces Transaction in Own Shares - June 01
-
Brazil thrash Panama 6-2 in World Cup send-off
-
Senegal win can help fans 'trust' US World Cup bid, says Pochettino
-
Trump acolyte, leftist icon: Who will be Colombia's next leader?
-
De la Espriella, Cepeda through to Colombia presidential runoff
-
Brazilian teen Fonseca downs Ruud to reach French Open quarters
-
Cepeda, de la Espriella lead race for Colombia presidency
-
Tuisova hands Racing Top 14 play-off boost with win over Clermont
-
Pulisic finds form before World Cup as US beat Senegal 3-2
-
Australia include Italy youth international Volpato in World Cup squad
-
Mensik holds off Rublev to book maiden French Open last-eight spot
-
France's Boutier rallies to capture LPGA ShopRite title
-
Wanyonyi in shock defeat to Briton's Burgin in Rabat Diamond League
-
Undav eases Germany past Finland in World Cup tune-up
-
Nicaraguan Indigenous leader imprisoned under Ortega dies in detention
-
'Stuff you dream of': Kohli steers Bengaluru to second straight IPL crown
-
Vingegaard wins Giro d'Italia to complete Grand Tour set
-
Kohli steers Bengaluru to second straight IPL crown
-
Singer Dua Lipa marries actor Callum Turner: media
-
'Backrooms', based on YouTube horror series, breaks box office records
-
Swiatek exits French Open, Zverev eases into quarters
-
Paris Saint-Germain players celebrate amid riot recriminations
-
Konate leaves Liverpool on a free transfer
-
Colombia chooses president amid surge in guerrilla violence
-
Leverkusen striker Schick to lead Czech attack at World Cup
-
Italy bans Kanye West concert over security concerns
-
Kvaratskhelia named Champions League player of the season
-
Constitution River leads home O'Brien 1-2-3 in French Derby
-
Africa CDC says over 1,100 suspected Ebola cases in DR Congo and Uganda
US tariff dispute: No winner
The trade conflict between the US and China, which began in 2018, has had a lasting impact on the global economy. Under the leadership of President Donald Trump and President Xi Jinping, a bitter tariff dispute developed, characterised by reciprocal punitive tariffs and countermeasures. In April 2025, both countries agreed to a temporary reduction in tariffs: the US reduced its tariffs on Chinese goods from 145% to 30%, while China reduced tariffs on US products from 125% to 10%. This 90-day agreement is seen as a step towards de-escalation, but a final resolution of the conflict remains elusive.
Origin and development
It all began in March 2018, when the US imposed tariffs on Chinese imports worth 50 billion dollars in order to reduce the trade deficit and protect domestic industries. China responded promptly with its own tariffs on US goods, triggering a spiral of escalation. Over the years, tariffs were imposed on goods worth hundreds of billions of dollars, ranging from technology products to agricultural goods and consumer goods. This conflict quickly became a central element of the geopolitical rivalry between the two superpowers.
The Phase One Agreement
A milestone was the ‘Phase One’ agreement in January 2020. China committed to purchasing an additional $200 billion worth of US goods over two years, including agricultural products and industrial goods. Improvements in intellectual property protection and a waiver of forced technology transfers were also agreed. However, implementation lagged behind: China did not fully meet its purchase commitments, which kept tensions high and prompted the US to consider new measures.
Current situation
The April 2025 agreement marks another attempt to defuse the conflict. Nevertheless, the situation remains fragile. China has intensified its trade relations with countries in Southeast Asia in order to reduce its dependence on the US market. At the same time, the US is threatening new tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, which could reignite the dispute. These developments make it clear that the tariff dispute goes far beyond pure trade policy and is deeply embedded in strategic considerations.
Economic impact
The economic consequences are being felt by both sides. In the US, higher import prices have weighed on consumers, while companies are struggling with higher costs and disrupted supply chains. China has seen its economic growth slow, but has shown resilience thanks to diversified trading partnerships. The conflict has not only damaged bilateral relations, but also reshaped the global economy as both countries seek to minimise their mutual dependence.
Conclusion: A stalemate with no winners
The tariff dispute between Trump and Xi Jinping has not produced a clear winner. Although the US was able to force some concessions, China has strengthened its strategic position through diversification and technological independence. Both countries are paying a high economic price, and the latest tariff reduction is merely a temporary truce. The conflict remains an open chapter in the rivalry between the US and China, with neither side gaining the upper hand.
Fentanyl trade unravels
Russia’s dollar pivot
Israel riled by US-Iran pact
Red sea gambit with Eritrea
US China race hits 2027
Brussels misreads Magyar
Scandic Coin, (SNC) and Trust
Global finance in few hands
AI's 18-month Job disruption
Iran war fuels terror risks
Bitcoin slump stirs doubt