-
Late Guirassy winner for Dortmund trims Bayern's lead atop Bundesliga
-
'Free the mountains!": protest in Milan over Winter Olympics
-
Gyokeres double helps Arsenal stretch Premier League lead
-
Six Nations misery for Townsend as Italy beat sorry Scotland
-
Spain, Portugal face fresh storms, torrential rain
-
Opinions of Zuckerberg hang over social media addiction trial jury selection
-
Over 2,200 IS detainees transferred to Iraq from Syria: Iraqi official
-
Norway's Ruud tops Olympic men's freeski slopestyle qualifying
-
Czech qualifier Bejlek claims first title in Abu Dhabi
-
French duo reach Shanghai, completing year-and-a-half walk
-
Australian snowboarder James eyes elusive Olympic gold
-
Sequins and snow: Eva Adamczykova makes Olympic return
-
Vonn set for Olympic medal bid after successful downhill training
-
Shepherd takes hat-trick as West Indies beat Scotland in T20 World Cup
-
Sausages will sell after thrill-seeker Von Allmen wins Olympic downhill
-
Swiss racer Von Allmen wins first gold of Winter Olympics
-
'Wake up': Mum sparks comeback after scare for freeski star Gu
-
Von Allmen wins men's Olympic downhill gold, first of Games
-
First medals up for grabs at Winter Olympics
-
Afghanistan captain Khan harbours dream of playing in Kabul
-
Lindsey Vonn completes second Winter Olympics downhill training run
-
Freeski star Gu survives major scare in Olympic slopestyle
-
Iran FM looks to more nuclear talks, but warns US
-
Hetmyer's six-hitting steers West Indies to 182-5 against Scotland
-
After boos for Vance, IOC says it hopes for 'fair play'
-
Thousands gather as Pakistan buries victims of mosque suicide attack
-
Lindsey Vonn completes second downhill training session
-
US pressing Ukraine and Russia to end war by June, Zelensky says
-
Faheem blitz sees Pakistan avoid Netherlands shock at T20 World Cup
-
Takaichi talks tough on immigration on eve of vote
-
England's Salt passed fit for T20 World Cup opener
-
Spain, Portugal brace for fresh storm after flood deaths
-
Pakistan bowl out Netherlands for 147 in T20 World Cup opener
-
Pushed to margins, women vanish from Bangladesh's political arena
-
Crypto firm accidentally sends $40 bn in bitcoin to users
-
Pistons end Knicks' NBA winning streak, Celtics edge Heat
-
Funerals for victims of suicide blast at Islamabad mosque that killed at least 31
-
A tale of two villages: Cambodians lament Thailand's border gains
-
Police identify suspect in disappearance of Australian boy
-
Cuba adopts urgent measures to address energy crisis: minister
-
Not-so-American football: the Super Bowl's overseas stars
-
Trump says US talks with Iran 'very good,' more negotiations expected
-
Trump administration re-approves twice-banned pesticide
-
Hisatsune leads Matsuyama at Phoenix Open as Scheffler makes cut
-
Beyond the QBs: 5 Super Bowl players to watch
-
Grass v artificial turf: Super Bowl players speak out
-
Police warn Sydney protesters ahead of Israeli president's visit
-
Simi Khanna Launches Simi Beauty SK: A Natural Skincare Line Blending Luxury, Wellness, and Purpose
-
Best Gold IRA Companies February 2026 Announced (Top Gold-backed IRA Companies Revealed)
-
Bolivia wants closer US ties, without alienating China: minister
US Supreme Court upholds ban on gender-affirming care for minors
The US Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld a state law banning gender-affirming medical treatments for transgender minors -– an issue at the heart of the American culture wars.
The court voted 6-3 to uphold a Tennessee law barring hormone therapy, puberty blockers and gender transition surgery for those under the age of 18.
The six conservative justices on the top court rejected a challenge to the law while the three liberals dissented.
Two dozen Republican-led states have enacted laws restricting medical care for transgender youth, and the case will have repercussions for the prohibitions across the country.
"This case carries with it the weight of fierce scientific and policy debates about the safety, efficacy, and propriety of medical treatments in an evolving field," wrote Chief Justice John Roberts, author of the majority opinion.
"The Court's role is not 'to judge the wisdom, fairness, or logic' (of the law) but only to ensure that the law does not violate equal protection guarantees," Roberts said.
"It does not. Questions regarding the law's policy are thus appropriately left to the people, their elected representatives, and the democratic process."
The Supreme Court heard the case in December and the Justice Department of then-president Joe Biden joined opponents of the law, arguing that it violated the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause since it denies transgender minors access to medical treatments permitted to others.
Republican President Donald Trump has since taken office and he signed an executive order in January restricting gender transition procedures for people under the age of 19.
While there is no US-wide law against gender-affirming medical treatments for transgender youth, the Trump order ended any federal backing for such procedures.
Reacting to the ruling, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) said it "sets a dangerous precedent for legislative interference in the practice of medicine."
"Gender-affirming care is medically necessary for treating gender dysphoria and is backed by decades of peer-reviewed research, clinical experience, and scientific consensus," the AAP said.
"Denying patients access to this care not only undermines their health and safety, it robs them of basic human dignity."
- 'Must end' -
The Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative legal group, welcomed the ruling as a "huge win for children" and a "step toward ending dangerous experiments on kids."
During oral arguments in December, Tennessee Solicitor General Matthew Rice told the court the law was designed to "protect minors from risky, unproven medical interventions" with "often irreversible and life-altering consequences."
Chase Strangio, an American Civil Liberties Union attorney representing three transgender adolescents, their parents, and a Memphis-based doctor, countered that the law has "taken away the only treatment that relieved years of suffering."
"What they've done is impose a blunderbuss ban, overriding the very careful judgment of parents who love and care for their children and the doctors who have recommended the treatment," said Strangio, the first openly transgender lawyer to argue before the court.
Trump, in his inauguration speech, said his government would henceforth only recognize two genders -- male and female -- and he issued his executive order a week later restricting gender transition procedures for minors.
"Across the country today, medical professionals are maiming and sterilizing a growing number of impressionable children," the executive order said. "This dangerous trend will be a stain on our Nation's history, and it must end."
Trump's order said it would now be US policy that it would "not fund, sponsor, promote, assist, or support the so-called 'transition' of a child from one sex to another."
The order bars funding for gender transition under the Medicaid health insurance program for poor families, the Medicare scheme used by retirees, and Defense Department health insurance that covers some two million children.
According to a study by UCLA's Williams Institute, an estimated 1.6 million people aged 13 and older in the United States identify as transgender.
M.Fischer--AMWN