-
ICC hears charges against Ugandan warlord Kony
-
Most Asian markets rise on US rate hopes, Tokyo hits record
-
Nottingham Forest sack head coach Nuno after rift with owner
-
Thai top court to rule on ex-PM Thaksin's prison term
-
Major social media sites back online in Nepal after deadly protests
-
From rocky start to Oscar hopeful: Dwayne Johnson hits Toronto
-
Murdoch family settles dispute over media empire succession
-
Trump's alleged birthday note to Epstein released by House panel
-
Killing Hong Kong's Lai would strengthen democracy message, son says
-
D-Day approaches in Bolsonaro coup trial
-
Israel film at Toronto fest entrenches industry split over Gaza
-
Thai top court to rule on ex-PM Thaksin's prison stay
-
North Korea's Kim oversees ICBM engine test: state media
-
Nottingham Forest sack boss Nuno Espirito Santo
-
Trump admin launches immigration raids in Chicago
-
Murdoch family settles dispute on control of media assets
-
Norway PM's left bloc wins election, populists surge
-
Italy avoid disaster, Kosovo win in World Cup qualifying
-
Tonali saves Italy from World Cup disaster against Israel
-
Late Ben Romdhane goal seals Tunisia berth in 2026 World Cup
-
OpenAI backs AI-animated film for Cannes debut
-
Kane says England 'prepared' amid racism fears in Serbia clash
-
US Supreme Court allows roving LA immigration patrols
-
Pressure is a privilege for England boss Tuchel
-
Macron scrambles to find new French PM after Bayrou ousted
-
At least 19 killed in Nepal protest over social media ban, corruption
-
Ex-WhatsApp executive sues Meta over alleged security failures
-
From Dada to Surrealism : NY's Met bags major modern art injection
-
Trial opens for man accused of golf course plot to kill Trump
-
Prince Harry pays respects at grandmother's grave
-
Israeli PM tells Gaza City residents to 'leave now'
-
Argentine peso, stocks fall after ruling party's election setback
-
At least 17 killed in Nepal protest over social media ban, corruption
-
Man City and Premier League end dispute over sponsor rules
-
De Jong joins Barca sickbay after picking up knock on international duty
-
BRICS leaders denounce protectionism, tariff 'blackmail'
-
Argentina's Milei to join far-right rally in Madrid
-
Germany's VW, China's BYD face off at Munich auto show
-
Teen arrested after two Turkish police officers shot dead
-
Lawyers caught in Turkey's crackdown on opposition
-
Private hometown funeral for Italian fashion legend Armani
-
Nepal police open fire, killing 17 protesting social media ban
-
African Union chief calls for more 'climate justice' funds
-
UN nuclear watchdog says hopes for inspections deal with Iran soon
-
Trump hails cancelation of award ceremony for Tom Hanks
-
VW unveils affordable EVs to take on Chinese rivals
-
Excessive debt 'life-threatening' for France, PM tells parliament
-
Tri-series win confidence builder for Pakistan, says coach Hesson
-
Leverkusen name Hjulmand as Ten Hag replacement
-
Appeal trial of France's Le Pen to begin in January 2026: court
Boomers: Selfish or Scapegoats?
The debate over whether the Baby Boomer generation—those born between 1946 and 1964—deserves the label of "the most selfish generation in history" has intensified in recent years. Critics argue that Boomers have prioritised their own comfort and prosperity at the expense of future generations, while defenders point to their contributions to social progress and economic growth. This article explores both sides of the argument, drawing on economic, social, and cultural factors to assess the validity of the claim.
A Generation of Prosperity
The post-World War II era was a time of unprecedented economic growth, particularly in Western nations. Boomers grew up in a period of relative stability and prosperity, benefiting from expanding educational opportunities, affordable housing, and a booming job market. This generation was the first to enjoy the fruits of modern consumer culture, with access to new technologies, healthcare advancements, and a welfare state that provided a safety net. However, this prosperity has been criticised as a double-edged sword. While Boomers thrived, they are accused of failing to address long-term challenges such as climate change, economic inequality, and the sustainability of social security systems. The argument goes that their focus on short-term gains has left younger generations—particularly Millennials and Generation Z—facing a future of environmental degradation, housing crises, and precarious employment.
The Burden of Debt
One of the most frequently cited examples of Boomer selfishness is their approach to public debt. Over the past few decades, national debts have soared in many countries, driven by policies that prioritised tax cuts, increased spending on entitlements, and economic stimulus measures. Critics argue that Boomers, who have held political and economic power during this period, have been complicit in passing on this financial burden to future generations. The rising cost of healthcare, pensions, and social security, combined with stagnating wages for younger workers, has fuelled resentment. In some nations, national debt has increased dramatically since the turn of the century, a period during which Boomers dominated leadership positions. This fiscal irresponsibility, some argue, reflects a generational disregard for the future.
The Housing Divide
Housing is another area where Boomers are accused of hoarding wealth. In many developed countries, property prices have skyrocketed, making homeownership increasingly unattainable for younger generations. Boomers, who bought homes when prices were relatively low, have seen their property values soar, creating a wealth gap that is difficult for Millennials and Gen Z to bridge. Over the past few decades, average house prices have risen significantly while wages have remained largely stagnant. This has led to accusations that Boomers have pulled up the ladder behind them, benefiting from policies that favoured property ownership while younger generations are left renting or struggling to save for deposits.
A Legacy of Progress
However, it would be unfair to paint the entire generation with the same brush. Boomers have also been responsible for significant social progress. The civil rights movements of the 1960s and 1970s, which fought for racial equality, gender rights, and LGBTQ+ inclusion, were largely driven by Boomer activists. Their contributions to technology, healthcare, and education have also been transformative. The digital revolution, which laid the foundation for the modern internet and communication technologies, was spearheaded by Boomer innovators. Moreover, many Boomers have engaged in philanthropy and community service, challenging the notion that they are universally selfish.
Generational Perceptions
Another important factor to consider is the role of generational differences in shaping perceptions of selfishness. Younger generations, facing economic uncertainty and environmental crises, may view Boomers' actions through a lens of frustration. However, it is worth noting that every generation has faced criticism from its successors. The Silent Generation, who preceded the Boomers, were often derided for their conformity and conservatism, while Millennials have been labelled as entitled and overly reliant on technology. This cyclical nature of generational criticism suggests that the "selfish" label may be more a reflection of changing societal values than an objective truth.
Structural Influences
Furthermore, the accusation of selfishness overlooks the structural factors that have shaped Boomer behaviour. The economic policies of the late 20th century, particularly the rise of neoliberalism, encouraged individualism and short-term thinking. Boomers, like all generations, were influenced by the prevailing ideologies of their time. The shift towards deregulation, privatisation, and globalisation was not solely a Boomer creation but a broader political and economic trend. To single out Boomers as uniquely selfish ignores the complex interplay of historical forces that have shaped modern society.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while there is evidence to suggest that the Boomer generation has benefited disproportionately from economic and social conditions, labelling them as "the most selfish generation in history" is an oversimplification. Their contributions to social progress and innovation cannot be ignored, nor can the structural factors that have influenced their behaviour. The intergenerational debate is likely to continue, but it is essential to approach it with nuance, recognising that each generation operates within the constraints and opportunities of its time.

Russia: Is Putin's time nearly up?

China, Trump, and the power of war?

Iran's Ayatollahs the next to Fall?

Who wins and who loses in Syria?

South Korea: Yoon Suk Yeol shocks Nation

Dictator Putin threatens to destroy Kiev

Will Trump's deportations be profitable?

Ishiba's Plan to Change Power in Asia

EU: Online platforms to pay tax?

EU: Energy independence achieved!

EU: Record number of births!
